Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim test

Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim Test

This is a discussion on Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim Test within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Handgun: Taurus PT92, 5" barrel Ammunition: Remington UMC 9mm standard pressure, 115gr, packaged in a 100 round "value pack" L9MM1B I was asking around the ...

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim test

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array Joshua M. Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wabash IN
    Posts
    676

    Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim test

    Handgun: Taurus PT92, 5" barrel
    Ammunition: Remington UMC 9mm standard pressure, 115gr, packaged in a 100 round "value pack" L9MM1B

    I was asking around the various gun boards about this stuff a while back. I received mixed opinions as to how it would perform, so I went ahead and bought it with the intention of testing it. If the tests came out in its favor I would relegate it to second string carry ammuntion and woods ammunition. Here is the test using four layers of denim and water jugs.


    Most important to any handgun/ammuniton combination is the the ability of the ammunition to function reliably in the firearm. Though I've done some gunsmithing to my Taurus to make it ultra-reliable, bullet shape never hurts either. As you can see, this Remington hollowpoint has almost a hardball profile.

    Being old tech, this round is representative of older style hollowpoints designed to be used in pistols originally engineered to feed ball reliably. It works.


    My standard water test setup...


    And from the front...

    That four layers of denim is thicker than it may look on camera. Take the leg of your blue jeans and fold it in half - imagine a hollowpoint bullet performing properly after being plugged with that much material.

    Usually I insert a movie of the shot here, but I was shooting alone today.


    After the shot I discovered two things: First, the bullet didn't seem affected in its performance by the denim as the front jug exploded and landed on the ground, seperated from the denim which had been taped on well. The second thing I noticed was that, after shredding the second jug as well as the first, the bullet veered off and disappeared. (I set the jug back up for photographic purposes.)

    Though I could postulate what happened from the reaction of the milk jugs, I didn't have a bullet and therefore nothing was "solid." I set up two more jugs which were meant to be used to test my carry round, the Bonded Golden Saber. That'll have to wait a week or so now.


    As you can see, the second setup is the same as the first.


    Here is the front jug and denim exactly how they landed after my second shot. The jug seemed to have been launched into the air and was totally shredded, looking as if someone had put a mouse inside and thrown it to the coyotes! This is performance typical to hollowpoints the generation previous to our current "best" crop.

    The previous generation of hollowpoints, while they typically expanded well, usually did so in the first few inches. This was true of the Silvertip, and in my experience, true also of the Federal C9BP "Classic" hollowpoint. I used this last to dispatch a sick rabbit once at 15 yards or so, and it took that rabbit apart, looking as if it had expanded almost fully before exiting the broadside shot.


    These are jug numbers, from right to left, 2, 3, and 4. Notice how jug #2 is blown out, and jug #3 is losing water.


    I found the spent bullet between jugs #3 and #4.


    The bullet exhibited textbook expansion after passing through four layers of denim. Again, fold the leg of your blue jeans and imagine the bullet performing well after passing through that barrier. As well, I didn't measure correctly. These jugs are 6" thick instead of the 4" I am used to. Penetration was closer to 18" in water, or about 9" in ballistic gelatin.

    Sorry about that, folks. The milk people need to tell me when they're going to change form factor! Oops! Seriously, I should have measured before jumping to conclusions. I will do so from now on.


    A closer shot of the expanded bullet. As I said, textbook performance...


    Curiously, the jacket and core did not try to seperate. Though I'm not too concerned about it, I may email Remington to see if they've begun bonding everything...


    From the front, you can see how the jacket peeled back. Though not designed like the Black Talon, Ranger or SXT, this jacket is fairly sharp and protrudes enough that I'd guess it would see some "action" if used for serious purposes.

    Honestly, this stuff surprised me. Though I carried the +P version of this ammuntion while waiting for some premium stuff to arrive, I didn't truly feel comfortable with it and used it for range fodder as soon as the premium ammunition arrived.

    Not the best these days by any stretch of the imagination, this Remington ammunition, now (perhaps sadly) relegated to discount store bulk ammunition sales, still has plenty of punch to do most jobs which need doing. While not top-of-the-line any longer for barrier penetration, having been designed to the older penetration specification of 10" - 12" instead of the 12" - 14" we usually accept as the golden standard today, this old style ammo should still do the job in most defensive situations encountered by law enforcement and legally armed private citizens.

    I'm favorably impressed.

    Josh <><


  2. #2
    Senior Moderator
    Array pgrass101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    13,627
    Thanks Josh

    You are giving some great reports
    A real man loves his wife, and places his family as the most important thing in life. Nothing has brought me more peace and content in life than simply being a good husband and father.

  3. #3
    Member Array kracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    ga.
    Posts
    104
    Thanks for the info. I'm carrying the same ammo in my Taurus 92 Compact for the reliability factor.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array sui-juris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    521
    Great write up and fun to read.

  5. #5
    VIP Member
    Array simon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    3,017
    Thanks Josh,I have a bunch of that ammo I bought on a clearence sale....good post and Information!!

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. *test* Fiocchi .45acp 230gr Standard Pressure
    By Joshua M. Smith in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 9th, 2008, 05:12 AM
  2. test By Request: BH 124gr+P GDHP Water/Denim
    By Joshua M. Smith in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: August 18th, 2007, 08:28 PM
  3. S&W 38 Spl Water + Denim test
    By Joshua M. Smith in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 10th, 2007, 04:54 PM
  4. Good Price? Rem 115gr HP Standard Pressure
    By Joshua M. Smith in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 4th, 2007, 07:53 PM
  5. Water Denim test CCI .22 LR 5 Inch Barrel
    By Joshua M. Smith in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: August 3rd, 2007, 08:17 PM

Search tags for this page

best standard pressure 9mm
,
best standard pressure 9mm ammo
,

l9mm1b

,
rem l9mm1b
,
remington 9mm 115 gr jhp reviews
,

remington l9mm1b

,

remington l9mm1b ballistics

,
remington l9mm1b penetration
,
remington l9mm1b test
,
remington umc 115gr hp ballistics
,
remington umc 9mm 115 gr jhp ballistics
,
remington umc 9mm test
Click on a term to search for related topics.