The New Green Bullet
This is a discussion on The New Green Bullet within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; This M-16 Round's Environmentally "Friendly," But Still Deadly!
Coming soon to an M-16 near you -- The bullet on the left is a lead-free “green” ...
-
July 23rd, 2005 09:18 AM
#1
Administrator
Array
The New Green Bullet
This M-16 Round's Environmentally "Friendly," But Still Deadly!
Coming soon to an M-16 near you -- The bullet on the left is a lead-free “green” 5.56mm M-16 bullet. The one on the right is a standard lead bullet. The Army has replaced the lead with an evironmentally friendly tungsten- tin mixture.

By Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON
Some range NCOs talk about "slinging lead
down range." In the future they'll have to talk about
"slinging tungsten and tin."
That's because the Army is producing environmentally
friendly ammunition. The first million rounds will be
produced at Lake City (Mo.) Army Ammunition Plant, and
officials expect troops from all services to be using the
new "green" rounds soon after.
Researchers at the Army's Armament Research, Development
and Engineering Center at Picatinny Arsenal, N.J.,
developed the 5.56 mm bullets, which have a tungsten-tin
core sheathed in copper. Current rounds use lead cores.
Don't let "environmentally friendly" fool you: The new
rounds proved slightly more accurate than the lead versions
during testing, officials said. The new rounds are
ballistically and visibly identical to the old and require
no special handling.
Alaskan National Guardsmen recently finished qualifying
using the new rounds. "There was no difference in the
performance of the rounds concerning shot groups or
functioning of the weapon," said Army Maj. Gary Curtiss,
operations officer with the 1st Battalion (Scouts), 297th
Infantry.
"We've been working on this for about two years," said Jim
Arnold, chief of the pollution prevention and environmental
technology division at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md. "The
concept is part of an Army initiative called Range 21. It
is about the Army being good stewards of training and
testing lands."
The idea is to reduce lead in the environment. The heavy
metal and its chemical compounds are poisonous. Even small
doses can cause irreversible brain damage if ingested or
breathed.
Contrary to news reports, lead contamination is not
currently a problem at military outdoor ranges, although it
could conceivably leach into surface water on some of the
more heavily used ranges, he said.
"There's no problem now, but there could be," Arnold said.
"Why not look ahead, anticipate problems and solve them
before they start?"
Arnold said the concern is indoor ranges, such as those
used regularly by the reserve components. He said many
indoor ranges have been closed. While lead contamination is
part of the total picture, general health concerns about
the vapors, residues and other pollutants created by firing
rounds plays a larger role in closing the indoor ranges.
Still lead is toxic and “if we can get rid of even the
small chance of breathing lead, we should,” Arnold said.
The tungsten-tin solution is not expensive. Arnold said the
costs of new and old rounds are comparable. Once in mass
production, tungsten-tin bullets may be cheaper than lead
ones, he predicted. The Army buys all the small arms
ammunition for the military -- 200 million 5.56mm lead-
copper rounds in fiscal 1998.
If the green 5.56mm round proves successful in actual field
use, researchers will move to 7.62 mm, 9 mm and .50-caliber
rounds. "The next is the '50-cal,'" Arnold said. "There's a
small amount of lead in the round we think we can get rid
of through improving the industrial process in making it.
"The 9 mm is the tough nut to crack, because the bullet is
fairly large," Arnold continued. "There has to be some cost
reduction on tungsten-tin before this will work."
"Green" bullets solve only the problem of reducing lead in
the environment. Scientists also are working to make bullet
propellants and primers "greener."
"All my young engineers have been excited about working on
this project," Arnold said. "There isn't really a down side
to it."
-
July 23rd, 2005 09:18 AM
Remove Ads
-
July 23rd, 2005 09:43 AM
#2
Lead Moderator
Array
Enviro friendly? Or better performance against harder targets?
-
July 23rd, 2005 09:50 AM
#3
Lead Moderator
Array
That makes as much sense to me as carefully disinfecting the injection site for a leathal injection!! I doubt if the person being put to death is going to worry about a dirty needle!!
Rick
EOD - Initial success or total failure

-
July 23rd, 2005 10:01 AM
#4
Administrator
Array
I Wonder ???????????
I wonder if groups like The Sierra Club & Green Peace are going to start liking guns more now that bullets will be environmentally friendly?
-
July 23rd, 2005 01:41 PM
#5
DC Founder
Array
I hope it catches on for one reason. Opposition to shooting ranges is often based on lead contamination of the property. That allows them to get the EPA involved to "order a cleanup" or threaten them with fines if they continue operation. This would remove that arguement and ranges would have one less complaint to deal with.
Bumper
Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde; Beware the anger of a patient man.
-
July 23rd, 2005 03:26 PM
#6
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Bumper
I hope it catches on for one reason. Opposition to shooting ranges is often based on lead contamination of the property. That allows them to get the EPA involved to "order a cleanup" or threaten them with fines if they continue operation. This would remove that arguement and ranges would have one less complaint to deal with.
Exactly.
-
July 23rd, 2005 04:30 PM
#7
Distinguished Member
Array
TUNGSTEN ?? Will they still be (+/-) 55grs. ??
-
July 23rd, 2005 05:31 PM
#8
Administrator
Array
Lead
Whatever eliminates vaporized lead I'm all for.
I've had enough exposure to breathable lead.
-
July 23rd, 2005 07:38 PM
#9
Assistant Administrator
Array
Sounds good up to a point but - I wonder what EPA will eventually make of the tungsten/tin mix - I seem to remember Tungsten, unless highly refined, contains a small amount of Cobalt - which is not too friendly at all. I'm sure the anti's will something to b**ch about.
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.
"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."
http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By zero in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
Replies: 5
Last Post: February 13th, 2011, 11:03 AM
-
By CT-Mike in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Replies: 18
Last Post: November 12th, 2010, 11:52 AM
-
By SaddleSC in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Replies: 35
Last Post: April 27th, 2009, 08:59 PM
-
By primer in forum New Members Introduce Yourself
Replies: 31
Last Post: September 4th, 2006, 11:09 PM
-
By mike benedict in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Replies: 6
Last Post: January 8th, 2005, 02:05 AM
Search tags for this page
green bullet
, green bullet 556
, m 16 bullet
, m 16 bullets
, m 16 round
, new army bullet 556
, new green 5.56
, new green bullet
, new green lead free 556 ammunition
, new military 556 bullet
, tin bullets
, tin-core bullet 5.56
, tungsten 50 cal bullet
, tungsten 556 bullet
, tungsten bullets