Well there you go. I hereby introduce Euclidean's Law.
Euclidean's Law: Anything speculated by the poster Euclidean will eventually be proven total crap in reality at some point in time.
But seriously, I'm honestly shocked that there's an anatomical weakness in those big animals that allows for penetration of such a small round, that and I feel it's an unfair comparison. Self defense is not a sporting game where we get to carefully set up and choose our shots.
What's funny is I've had this same debate before in real life, and the people always telling me that I might as well use a .22 as anything else all tend to carry .45 ACP chambered firearms. So it's okay for them to use a real service caliber with adequate power, but me, I should just stick to pea shooters...
The more I learn about the dynamics of these situations from what others tell me, I come to three conclusions:
1. If you can't connect, you're sunk. A miss with a .45 ACP is just as ineffective as a miss with a .38 Special.
A badly placed shot might as well be considered a miss. ExSoldier762:
Here I disagree. A badly placed 45 is still going to induce greater shock than a badly placed ANYTHING smaller.
2. If you can connect and you don't take the opportunity to do as much damage as you can with what you have to work with, you may very well be ******* your own life away.
3. Tack driving accuracy is not the goal of the combat shooter. The goal is to be consistently able to hit meaningful targets under a variety of conditions. A good combat shooter is someone who can put it in the COM regardless of whether or not the target is moving, regardless of whether or not the shooter is moving, regardless of lighting conditions, etc.
The trouble is this is all so much easier said than done... you can work your whole life on it and never get it right.