Wierd ammo test on 2 .40 cal. cartridges

Wierd ammo test on 2 .40 cal. cartridges

This is a discussion on Wierd ammo test on 2 .40 cal. cartridges within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Ran a small test on 2 diff. .40 cal. S&W cartridges this eve and got some (I thought) wierd results. I set up an old ...

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Wierd ammo test on 2 .40 cal. cartridges

  1. #1
    Member Array Kentucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    118

    Wierd ammo test on 2 .40 cal. cartridges

    Ran a small test on 2 diff. .40 cal. S&W cartridges this eve and got some (I thought) wierd results. I set up an old computer manual ie 'The Macintosh Bible" , a 2-1/2" thick large paper back and fired my two 40 S&W's from my Bersa Firestorm into it from 20ft away. The 2 cartridges were a Federal Hydra Shok JHP 135 gr. and Winchester white box FMJ 165 gr. Much to my surprise, the Fed. Hydra Shok went completely through the book and buried somewhere into the ground while the Win. full metal jacket only penetrated 1-3/4" and even more surprising, it even 'mushroomed' approx. 10-20%similar to a hollow pt. !!!!! These 2 bullets seemed to act exactly opposite of what you would think to be !?!!
    Can't figure out why except that the Fed. might be a much 'hotter' load than the Win. and also it , being a lighter grain bullet, had much more velocity and therefore penetration ?? Any comments??
    Thanks
    diplomacy ... the art of saying "nice doggie"..while looking for a big rock !!


  2. #2
    Ex Member Array HollowpointHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    303
    That does seem strange. When reading about guns being tested, I see that sometimes the heavier loads that you would think would travel faster, actually go slower. I can't make sense of some of these things!

  3. #3
    Member Array uudl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    98
    Allthough I have never chronographed the Federal load I would expect the Federal Hydra Shock to be quite a bit hotter. I have Chrongraphed the WWB 165 gr FMJ load at 1022 FPS out of a 4" barrel which is about the mildest factory load for this weight of bullet I have Chronographed. The only way I could explain the slight mushrooming of the FMJ is that it must have a very thin jacket. I have chronographed other brands of 135 gr ammo and the velocity is usually up about 1300 FPS or more.

  4. #4
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    Assuming the book was dry then - a JHP would not achieve any expansion for hydraulic reasons and - it is obviously hot enough to just penetrate. Even maybe the ''cookie-cutter'' aspect could have helped it drill thru.

    The FMJ certainly as uudl said - could have a pretty thin jacket and once it impacted, upset could have been rapid and so once lead core exposed at all - it mushroomed - purely for reasons of distortion.

    A seemingly odd result but on reflection maybe not too surprising.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  5. #5
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    16,149
    I would guess the Hydra shock would be loaded "hotter" , and with a lighter bullet would have a higher velocity.

  6. #6
    Member Array Kentucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    118
    [QUOTE=P95Carry]Assuming the book was dry then - a JHP would not achieve any expansion for hydraulic reasons

    The book was dry but i would'a thought that the Fed. would have filled with enough paper to expand it but like the bullet is called.." Hydra Shok", it probably like you said needed a "Hydraulic " aspect to perform. One other thing, The boxes of WWB .40 S&W's I have bought for the past year or so (Walmart) , were FMJ's that look as if they are BRASS jacketed or at least plated ? rather than copper and the box I just bought yesterday, for the first time, were definitely copper jacketed. The jacket was fairly thick as where it split soom after mushrooming, it was thick enough where I couldn't 'peel' it any with my thumb nail !
    Thanks for the inputs guys !!!!!
    diplomacy ... the art of saying "nice doggie"..while looking for a big rock !!

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. My 38 Special Ammo test
    By Powhs in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: January 5th, 2011, 10:03 PM
  2. A little 380 ACP ammo test for ya (results pictures)
    By claybreaker0 in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: October 19th, 2010, 03:06 PM
  3. How much SD ammo to test for reliability?
    By Wasabi in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: February 5th, 2009, 05:07 PM
  4. Glock 26 ammo test
    By sdelam in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: July 28th, 2007, 11:26 PM
  5. Double Tap Ammo test
    By ELCruisr in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: April 23rd, 2007, 03:10 PM

Search tags for this page

.40 ammo test
,
.40 ammunition testing
,

40 cal ammo federal ballistics

,

40 cal ammo test

,

40 cal ballistics test

,
40 cal cartridges
,
40 s&w fmj ballistics test
,
ballistic test with hydroshock .40 video
,
federal .40 cal 165gr hydra shok
,

newest 40 cal. ammo tests

,
test results on 40 cal ammo
,
wallmart 40 cal ammo
Click on a term to search for related topics.