Wound Ballistics Myths

Wound Ballistics Myths

This is a discussion on Wound Ballistics Myths within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Here's an interesting excerpt from the IWBA , International Wound Ballistics Assoc. THE IWBA, Where the Wound Ballistics Facts Are by Gus Cotey, Jr. Firearms ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Wound Ballistics Myths

  1. #1
    Member Array Kentucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    118

    Wound Ballistics Myths

    Here's an interesting excerpt from the IWBA , International Wound Ballistics Assoc.
    THE IWBA, Where the Wound Ballistics Facts Are
    by
    Gus Cotey, Jr.


    Firearms users today have more access to technical data than ever before. Sophisticated trajectory and down range velocity tables, ballistic software, bullet velocity measuring chronographs, highly detailed ammunition hand loading data, and even millisecond accurate fast-draw timers are within the realm of acquisition by shooters of average means. The study of firearms has truly entered the information age. Unfortunately, not all of the information available about the effects of firearms is valid.

    Wound ballistics, the scientific study of the behavior of projectiles in the living tissues of animals and humans, has been plagued by more than its share of misinformation during the last several decades. Wound ballistics misinformation has had numerous deleterious effects upon society including oppressive and counterproductive firearms legislation, decreased law enforcement effectiveness, and even the improper treatment of gunshot injuries.

    Sources of erroneous wound ballistics information are wide and varied, and unfortunately, often prestigious. Much misinformation has been promulgated by government testing facilities, notables in the medical field, police administrators, politicians, ammunition manufacturers, and various gunwriters. What is needed to clear the air and, ultimately, the literature of wound ballistics misinformation is a non-partisan organization solely devoted to the critical, scientific study of all aspects wound ballistics. Such an organization has arrived. It's called the International Wound Ballistics Association (IWBA).

    The IWBA's journal, Wound Ballistics Review, is a splendid publication that boasts no peers in providing readers with the finest and most accurate wound ballistics information available. The focus of the articles contained therein is varied and includes such topics as defensive handgun ammunition selection, bullet testing protocols, the dynamics of projectile/tissue interaction, forensic investigation, analysis of historical events (e.g.,the JFK assassination), and wound ballistics literature reviews.

    Before further discussing the IWBA, let's look at some common wound ballistics myths that have become reinforced by repeated citation in books, movies, newscasts, and even by members of the shooting community (including somegun writers).


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MYTH #1: Human assailants and large animals are knocked down by the force of bullet impact when certain calibers featuring heavy, large diameter bullets are employed.

    FACT #1: This is the classical and most enduring ballistic myth. Observers often mistake a started reaction or a sudden involuntary spasm for a target animal being pushed back. However, a firearm's projectile cannot give its target a greater push than the shooter receives from the weapon's recoil (assuming that the gun has no propellant gas redirecting, recoil reducing features as in the case of recoilless rifles, etc.). Assuming that a bullet does not exit the target and that the target is stationary and suspended from a long cord, the speed a bullet imparts upon the target can be calculated by the formula: mv = (m + M)V, where: m = bullet mass, M = target mass, v = bullet impact velocity, V = the velocity of the target with bullet embedded in it. For practical purposes, we can use the weights of the bullet and target in place of mass, so long as both are expressed in the same units, in this case pounds. To convert a weight in grains to pounds, divide by 7000.

    A 1-ounce (437.5 grain or .0625 pound) 12 gauge shotgun slug at 1500 feet per second (f/s) could only make a 180-pound target move at .52 f/s. Considering that an average man walks at about 6 f/s, one can see that where small arms employed against humans and large animals are concerned, "knockdown" is a non-existent event. Plugging in the bullet weight and velocity figures of typical service pistol loads into the equation makes this whole"knock down" business seem even more absurd.

    MYTH #2: Bullets from modern assault rifles and their semiautomatic civilian look-alikes are vastly faster and more powerful than bullets from other small arms, and capable of heretofore unheard of horrendously extensive wounding effects.

    FACT #2: This modern-day urban myth is patently false. Assault rifle ammunition by definition has a power level that is in between that of pistol ammunitionand full power battle rifle ammunition (e.g., .30/06, 7.62x51 NATO). Furthermore, military issue ammunition for these guns is of full metal jacket configuration. Such bullets are generally less disruptive than expanding sporting bullets.

    Russian and Chinese 7.62x39 Ball ammunition for the AK-47 features full jacketed steel-cored, pointed boat-tail bullets that generally exhibit no deformation and minimal yaw for about 10 inches of soft tissue penetration, after which significant yaw generally commences. These bullets frequently are able to penetrate the torso with no more tissue disruption than low speed non-deforming .30 to .32 caliber pistol bullets. When loaded with expanding hunting bullets, the 7.62x39 round is considered only marginally adequate for deer at short to medium ranges, and is somewhat less powerful than the popular .30-30 Winchester which was developed in the 1890's.

    The 55 grain full jacketed, lead alloy cored M193 bullet loaded in the 5.56x45 (.223 Remington) Ball cartridges used in the M-16 in Vietnam is generally more disruptive at close range than the Russian AK-47 bullet because it yaws after an average of only 4 inches and fragments. However, this bullet may penetrate over 7.5 inches before any significant yaw and fragmentation takes place. When traveling through soft tissue point forward, the full jacketed M-16 bullet exhibits about the same tissue disruption as a low velocity, non-deforming .22 rimfire bullet. With expanding sporting bullets, the .223 is not considered an adequate general purpose deer cartridge and most game departments forbid its use on deer on the grounds that it is not disruptive enough for consistent results. For sporting use when loaded with expanding bullets, the .223 is viewed primarily as a good "varmint"round for pest animals up to the size of coyotes. However, there are several other common non-military .22 caliber centerfire pest cartridges such as the .22-250 and .220 Swift whose performances greatly exceed that of the .223.

    MYTH #3: Bullet wounds are so excruciatingly painful that most assailants are put out of action by this sensation alone.

    FACT #3: Most people who have survived being shot report little if any pain upon receiving their wounds. In fact many gunshot victims don't even realize they've been wounded until they actually see their injuries.

    MYTH #4: Human assailants are inherently more fragile and require less damage to become incapacitated than game animals of similar size.

    FACT #4: Some human gunshot victims are easily put out of commission by minor wounds due to their being timid or having preconceived notions of how to behave when shot. However, a determined human adversary is inherently no easier to incapacitate by gunfire than a jaguar, wild boar, cougar, black bear, or other game animal in the same weight class.

    The various tissues of humans and the analogous tissues of other similar sized mammals are virtually identical with respect penetrating projectile interaction. For example, a bullet that will penetrate 12 inches of hog muscle would penetrate a virtually identical amount of human muscle.

    For both game animals and humans, the only proven physiological mechanisms for incapacitation from gunshot wounds are: (A) blood loss from the bullet hole(s) depriving the brain of oxygen, and (B) disruption of brain or upper spinal cord. Incapacitation from central nervous system disruption tends to be nearly instantaneous, while incapacitation resulting solely from blood loss tends to be more or less gradual. A man shot in the heart may engage in voluntary activity for over 10 seconds. This really should not be surprising in view of the fact that deer, bear, and other large game frequently run more than 50 yards after their hearts have been disrupted by gunfire.

    MYTH #5: It should only take 1 or 2 shots in a vital area with any seriously powerful firearm loaded with modern ammunition to suddenly incapacitate an armed adversary. Any more shots fired is evidence of excessive use of force.

    FACT #5: To anyone who understands FACTS #1, #3, and #4 it should be obvious that no firearm can be always counted upon to stop a determined human adversary with only 1 or 2 shots, however well placed. There are documented cases on record of people who withstood several 12 Gauge 00 Buckshot loads and other cases where people withstood more than 25 pistol shots before collapsing. There are even cases where people failed to immediately fall after receiving penetrating brain injuries from bullets and other missiles.

    Those searching for a succinct and practical justification for personal defense firearms with rapid fire capabilities and high magazine capacities, or for the use of handgun ammunition featuring state of the art expanding bullets have one with FACT #5 (with FACTS #1, #3, and #4 adding further clarification).



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The wound ballistics myths just discussed represent the tip of the iceberg insofar as the misinformation associated with this deadly serious topic is concerned. Typical gun periodicals often contain informative articles intermingled with technically inaccurate ones. Also, many gun writers are merely sales reps for bullet/ammunition makers and their seemingly objective articles are nothing more than advertisements masked as technical evaluations. Misinformation is unfortunately also quite common in the medical literature, as the virus of political correctness erodes the integrity of once scientifically sound professional journals. Needless to say, the general news media are, to put it too kindly, less than reliable when it come to discussing theeffects of firearms.

    As stated before, The IWBA's journal, Wound Ballistics Review is the premier periodical on its namesake topic. Articles submitted to Wound Ballistics Review undergo strict peer review prior to publication to insure that what is contained therein is valid and in accordance to physical laws. For performing this peer review, IWBA has at its disposal surgeons, forensic pathologists, criminalists, weapons consultants, and even an honest-to-goodness rocket scientist. This peer review process is what the editorial staffs of all technical publications of consequence should do, but often neglect to do, with manuscripts submitted to them.

    Who can benefit from reading Wound Ballistics Review? Well, for starters how about: defensively armed citizens, police officers, police administrators, historians, lawmakers, defense attorneys, prosecuting attorneys, judges, gun buffs, surgeons, forensic pathologists, weapons designers, news reporters, editors, ammunition manufacturers, military personnel, and defense analysts. Of course, firearms rights activists, who must constantly swim upstream against a tidal wave of ballistics ignorance, will find Wound Ballistics Review a most valuable resource.
    diplomacy ... the art of saying "nice doggie"..while looking for a big rock !!


  2. #2
    VIP Member Array Bud White's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Away - Health Problems
    Posts
    17,352
    Good info there .. i always liek the it will knock you back arugments that spring up from the wanna be's

  3. #3
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    Hollywood must take the blame fair and square for almost all the supposed myths!!

    Thx KY - interesting read.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Array gregarat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    862
    I argue myth #1 with my partner who is a retired Detective, all of the time.
    No matter what evidence I show him, he truly believes a .45acp will actually knock someone down. Because "he has seen it happen".
    Now I have a math formula to boggle his mind with. Bwahahaha!!!

  5. #5
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    16,223
    What? Ya mena Dirty Harry can't really blow people off their feet!??! I am truely shocked!!

  6. #6
    Ex Member Array HollowpointHank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    303
    Okay that was extremely interesting and makes me want to read this journal. Where can I subscribe? Can I subscribe?

  7. #7
    Member Array Kentucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    118
    I found the subscription info for the IWBA as follows:

    Wound Ballistics Review is available to both IWBA members and non-member subscribers. It is published semiannually and the subscription price entitles one to 4 issues. Those wishing to be subscribers only should send a letter so stating. Included therein should be their name, address, city, state, zip, country, telephone number, and check. Subscription dues are $40 for USA addresses, $48 for Canadian/Mexican addresses, and $58 for other foreign addresses.

    Mail To:

    IWBA
    PO Box 701
    El Segundo, CA 90245-0701

    Those wishing to become IWBA Members (along with their subscription) and meeting membership qualification criteria should write to the above address stating that they wish to become members, and include the same information and check amounts previously stated. Also included should be documentation attesting that the individual is one of the following:

    1) a) A prior IWBA member b) A full-time law enforcement officer c) A member in good standing of any of the following organizations:
    Association of Firearms and Toolmarks Examiners
    American Academy of Forensic Sciences
    American College of Emergency Physicians
    American College of Surgeons
    Soci‚t‚ Fran‡aise Ballistique L‚sionelle

    2) A person who has contributed to the body of wound ballistics knowledge (either by adding scholarship or disseminating valid information) and submits evidence in support thereof, in addition to dues and other required information.

    3) A person interested in learning wound ballistics who does not meet the above criteria may apply for membership by submitting a letter of application stating his/her reasons for wishing to join and include two letters from IWBA members or persons qualified to be such under Section 1 above. Acceptance by the IWBA Membership Committee and payment of the dues will confer membership.

    The IWBA is a unique organization characterized by impeccable integrity and a devotion to intellectual excellence. There is only one possible drawback to prolonged exposure to IWBA literature; a slight queasiness when reading about bullet performance from the usual sources.
    diplomacy ... the art of saying "nice doggie"..while looking for a big rock !!

  8. #8
    Senior Member Array older gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    725
    Thanks Kentucky. That's a very informative read. Makes James Bond look kinda silly doesn't it.

  9. #9
    FLM
    FLM is offline
    Member Array FLM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    91
    The IWBA has been defunct for several years now, unfortunately. You can order back issues. http://www.firearmstactical.com/wbr.htm

    You'll note that this site is four years old so it would be a good idea to verify that back issues are still available before sending money.
    Last edited by FLM; November 11th, 2005 at 09:24 AM.

  10. #10
    Member Array soflasmg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    216
    Yeah, but .40 S&W still makes the bad guy vanish in a cloud of pink mist right?

  11. #11
    Lead Moderator
    Array rstickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    22,172
    Good article, and helps to put away the movie myth. As to the "pink mist", the only "small arm" that might come close is the 50 Cal. (Now someone will bring up the 40mm HE. )
    Rick

    EOD - Initial success or total failure

  12. #12
    Member Array DirksterG30's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by soflasmg
    Yeah, but .40 S&W still makes the bad guy vanish in a cloud of pink mist right?
    I thought that was .45ACP

  13. #13
    Member Array Kentucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    118
    Another very interesting article of various bullet ballistics, etc is at the following URL:

    http://www-medlib.med.utah.edu/WebPa...S/GUNBLST.html
    diplomacy ... the art of saying "nice doggie"..while looking for a big rock !!

  14. #14
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    More useful stuff KY thx - all makes good reference material to archive.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  15. #15
    VIP Member Array CLASS3NH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Bob from Southern New Hampshire
    Posts
    4,898
    Quote Originally Posted by rstickle
    Good article, and helps to put away the movie myth. As to the "pink mist", the only "small arm" that might come close is the 50 Cal. (Now someone will bring up the 40mm HE. )
    Did somebody mention a 40MM HE??

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Crazy Carry Myths
    By buckeye .45 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: April 30th, 2008, 11:13 PM
  2. Gun Control Myths Busted
    By LongRider in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: October 8th, 2007, 12:09 AM
  3. The Seven Myths of Gun Control
    By TonyW in forum Defensive Books, Video & References
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 14th, 2007, 11:08 AM
  4. Gun Myths
    By Bumper in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: December 18th, 2005, 07:21 PM
  5. Myths About Gun Control
    By Captain Crunch in forum The Second Amendment & Gun Legislation Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: November 13th, 2005, 01:54 PM

Search tags for this page

.22 terminal ballistics

,

.22 wound

,

.22 wound ballistics

,
.22 wounds
,

7.62x39 wound ballistics

,

fun facts about ballistics

,
gus cotey
,

interesting facts about ballistics

,

international wound ballistics association

,

international wound ballistics association iwba

,
iwba ballistics
,
wound ballistics
Click on a term to search for related topics.