230 vs 185 - Page 2

230 vs 185

This is a discussion on 230 vs 185 within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I've carried both. 230 or 185gr. I like Remington Golden Saber actually. I like the notion of the faster mover if it came down to ...

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: 230 vs 185

  1. #16
    Ex Member Array Ram Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    13,687
    I've carried both. 230 or 185gr. I like Remington Golden Saber actually. I like the notion of the faster mover if it came down to a one or the other choice though. That would obviously be the lighter 185gr.


  2. #17
    VIP Member
    Array falcon1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    6,484
    Quote Originally Posted by HotGuns View Post
    I reckon either one would end it.
    Quote Originally Posted by obxned View Post
    One of the best things about 45ACP is that it will do the job with nearly any ammo you feed it. If all I had to shoot was a light weight JHP, or a 230g FMJ, I still have confidence in the gun.

    Given my choice, I load +P 230g JHPs.
    Pick the one which shoots best for you. I think you'll get good results with almost any modern .45 Auto load. Good luck with whatever you choose, and stay safe!
    If the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.--Samuel Adams as Candidus, Boston Gazette 20 Jan. 1772

    Veteran--USA FA
    NRA Benefactor Life
    Tennessee Firearms Association Life

  3. #18
    VIP Member
    Array nn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    7,123
    Quote Originally Posted by coffeecup View Post
    My choice for carry is the 185gr DPX standard velocity loading from Tarus.---good stuff.
    I like those also.

  4. #19
    Member Array gotammo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    443
    411 ft# of energy for the 185's and 391 Ft# of energy for the 230 by the math your better off with the 185's

  5. #20
    Member Array Marvin Knox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    seattle, washington
    Posts
    250
    Danger Mouse:

    Any decently constructed (state of the art) .45 projectile will have no trouble giving adequate penetration. Heck, a "good" .38 will go into the core of any assailant if shot correctly. Assuming again a good modern bullet - the expansion will be as desired IF the projectile itself is chosen according to the velocity expected from the powder charge/barrel length.

    Check out the data yourself:

    Muzzle Energy Computer

    Anyone can figure the data for their own particular weapon and compare it to other weapons or to velocity/projectile changes with their own particular weapon.

    Note particularly the "efficacy" stats at the bottom of the chart. Just shooting a .45 vs. a smaller bullet kicks that particular stat up a whole bunch.

    Obviously, you'll see that the 185 grain wins both energy and efficacy hands down compared to the 230 grain (assuming your speeds are correct) - shoots flatter too (not that that's much of a factor at most self defense ranges). Just pick ammo with modern bonded core construction with a cavity that opens well at the speed expected and you'll be about as equipped as a man with a pistol can be whichever grain choice you choose.



    MARV

  6. #21
    Member Array 1911packer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    420
    As I understand it, a lighter projectile will decelerate faster than a heaver one when passing through an obstacle. It is also more prone to deflection. As an example, think of a car vs. a truck passing through a deep puddle of water.

  7. #22
    VIP Member Array SatCong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,030
    Quote Originally Posted by 1911packer View Post
    As I understand it, a lighter projectile will decelerate faster than a heaver one when passing through an obstacle. It is also more prone to deflection. As an example, think of a car vs. a truck passing through a deep puddle of water.
    You are right and speed well decelerate faster at longer ranges.
    NRA PATRON LIFE
    BROWN WATER NAVY

  8. #23
    Member Array Marvin Knox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    seattle, washington
    Posts
    250
    Right!

    Which is part of the reason that the 185 gr. is less likely to pass on through the assailant vs. the 230 gr. Both .45's (with good bullets) will be able to penetrate to the vitals of most any assailant. What you don't want is for the bullet to "over" penetrate.

    It is this combination of more impact energy and the most likelihood of dumping 100% of that energy into the core of an assailant that makes the 185 gr. the better choice of the two (IMO).

    Sure - if the assailant was wearing several layers of denim under a motorcycle jacket and or you had a quartering shot through the scapula from the rear -the choice of the 230 gr. could be justified.

    Every choice is a compromise of sorts considering the likely eventuality, I suppose.

  9. #24
    VIP Member Array SatCong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Marvin Knox View Post
    Right!

    Which is part of the reason that the 185 gr. is less likely to pass on through the assailant vs. the 230 gr. Both .45's (with good bullets) will be able to penetrate to the vitals of most any assailant. What you don't want is for the bullet to "over" penetrate.

    It is this combination of more impact energy and the most likelihood of dumping 100% of that energy into the core of an assailant that makes the 185 gr. the better choice of the two (IMO).

    Sure - if the assailant was wearing several layers of denim under a motorcycle jacket and or you had a quartering shot through the scapula from the rear -the choice of the 230 gr. could be justified.

    Every choice is a compromise of sorts considering the likely eventuality, I suppose.
    Yes,IF, I know what 230's & 200's grains do in the 45 acp. 1st 230 then 200 grain.
    NRA PATRON LIFE
    BROWN WATER NAVY

  10. #25
    Member Array Tros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    489
    The more I learn about ballistics, the more I realize just as long as you have a quality bullet (Which isn't hard to find), shot placement is going to be the deciding factor in an unfortunate skirmish.

    Do yourself a favor and find ammo that works well, and keep practicing with it; muscle memory will be increased, and so will your shot placement.

    With all of that said, I am a sucker for 230 grain ammo in the 45; no real reason other than I like it. Simply put, if it's coming out of a short barrel, I'll try to find the faster round; if it's got a longer barrel you can bet I'll wedge the heaviest bullet I can possibly put in there.
    Beretta 92FS

  11. #26
    Ex Member Array echobaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Southeast
    Posts
    261
    Momentum=Weight(grains)divided by 7000 x Velocity(fps)

  12. #27
    Senior Member Array Juggernaut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    569
    Golden Saber's been my carry choice since day one. I use the 185 gr. +P in my PX4 .45, 185 gr. +P in the M&P45, and the 230 gr. standard pressure in 1911. All three shoot POA=POI.
    I had some different lots of GS in 9 mm, .40 (bonded and unbonded), and .45 and see Remington changed the designs of their HP cavity every so often. The newer rounds have a deep, cone-shaped cavity while the older ones had sort of a "hollowed out" shaped cavity.
    Vis consili expers mole ruit sua.
    -Horace

  13. #28
    Distinguished Member Array 4my sons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Out side of Richmond, VA
    Posts
    1,637
    I agree with others, after shot placement, all other is pretty much personal preference.

    My personal belief is to use the biggest heaviest bullets I can control. .45 in 230gr standard pressure. Gold Dot's to be specific. Just my .02 worth.
    "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen." [Warren v. District of Columbia,(D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981)]
    If I have to explain it, you wouldn't understand

  14. #29
    VIP Member Array maclean3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    3,085
    Quote Originally Posted by HotGuns View Post
    I reckon either one would end it.
    That pretty much says it all, right there.

    Personally, I prefer the .230gr. std. pressure loads - but I'm old school. Use what you're comfortable with and your gun feeds reliably.
    Jack

  15. #30
    Member Array Rusty Bouquett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lake Wobegon
    Posts
    415
    With the .45 ACP you'll have at least 7 rounds to test on your attacker. What the heck, test'm all!! When you get done he'll not know if they were 185's, 200's, or 230's!! (Actually, you just keep shooting until the threat is neutralized}

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

185 gr vs 230 gr

,

185 grain vs 230 grain

,

185 grain vs 230 grain ammo

,

185 vs 230

,
185 vs 230 grain
,
230 gr vs 185 gr
,

230 grain vs 185 grain

,
230 vs 185
,
230 vs 185 45 ammo short barrel
,
45 185 vs 230
,
glock 30 230 grain velocities
,
glock 30 ammo 230 vs 185
Click on a term to search for related topics.