230 vs 185
This is a discussion on 230 vs 185 within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; was talked into getting some Gold Sabers for my .45 ACP. Picked up a box and did not realize they were 185 grain. I looked ...
June 30th, 2008 09:29 PM
230 vs 185
was talked into getting some Gold Sabers for my .45 ACP. Picked up a box and did not realize they were 185 grain. I looked it up and they do travel 1150 FPS as oposed to the 230 grain at 950 FPS. I am assuming the 185 wont have as much impact at the target. Any thoughts?
June 30th, 2008 09:54 PM
Actually I'm surprised at your numbers. I've not seen a 230 grain that could get more than 860 FPS even out of a slightly longer barrel. unless it was a handload carefully charged a bit higher.
Originally Posted by Danger Mouse
I am a propenent of the slightly lighter loads for those that are carrying sub-compact type .45 ACP's. In fact the industry it's self realized the need to jump up the velocity of the .45 ACP cartridge since more and CCW holders where opting for more small .45 platforms such as a 3.5" barrel 1911.
The logic being that the 230 grain was originaly designed to be thrown out of a 5" barrel not a 4" or certainly not a 3.5" barrel. Thus the lighter +P and 165 grain loads are showing up more and more. The tests seemed to indicate an expansion reliability issue with the 230 grain when thrown from a short barrel, the loss of velocity and some failure with the weapons themselves.
Just my .02 with some input from those in the know.
U.S. Army retired
June 30th, 2008 09:55 PM
The 185+p GS clocks 1141fps out of my 5"1911 and 1100fps out of Commander. The 230 GS runs 825fps to 862fps( two different ammo lots?) from 5". +p little hot for my taste. I shoot the 230 better. It shoots to POA w/fixed sights better in mine. Skygod has point about short barrels. Don't have 45 shorter than 4 1/4" but would look at lighter weight if I did.
June 30th, 2008 09:57 PM
Interesting. I am going to soak that in and check on it. I used the HK USP .45 full size with those 230 grain rounds. Now I have 3 Glock 30's and they do have shorter barrels than the HK.
June 30th, 2008 10:00 PM
I reckon either one would end it.
hecks...the next step towards registration and confiscation.
AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...http://bobbailey1959.wordpress.com/
June 30th, 2008 10:00 PM
I'm shooting 230 +P HST out of my 3.5" RIA the recoil is very manageable and run flawlessly
"Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country,"
--Mayor Marion Barry, Washington , DC .
June 30th, 2008 11:27 PM
Either one is gonna' leave a mark!
I use 230gr in my Kimbers and Glocks!
Stay armed...stay safe!
Last edited by RETSUPT99; July 1st, 2008 at 01:17 AM.
Proverbs 27:12 says: “The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and suffer for it.”
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
June 30th, 2008 11:37 PM
I also use 230 gr.
NRA PATRON LIFE
BROWN WATER NAVY
July 1st, 2008 03:21 AM
I use 230 rain in every thing from FMJ to HP... I tried the 165gr "lower recoil" HS loads and their recoil actually left the same to me, you might as well use a heavier round IMHO.
Sig P220R/Sig P239 (9mm)/ S&W 640/ Ruger Single Six Hunter (.22LR/Mag)/ CZ 452 Varmint .22LR/ Lee Enfield No4 MK2 sporterized dated 1959/ Mosin Nagant M90-30 dated 1942/
July 1st, 2008 08:33 AM
My choice for carry is the 185gr DPX standard velocity loading from Tarus.---good stuff.
July 1st, 2008 09:38 AM
230 gr Gold Dots here, I have a partial box of the Golden Sabers in 185Gr +P, Did some wet pack testing on both of them out of the same G21, 4.5" barrel.
The Gold Dots penetrated slightly further, and the GS were not the bonded ones, the jackets came off of all of them. I stuck with the God Dots. with no big difference in the cavity left by the bullets, and the Gold Dots were far more uniformed in expansion, I'll go with less recoil standard pressure any time.
230gr Gold Dots for me.
Your results may vary.
Oops, The wet pack testing was done with 200gr Gold Dots +P, not the 230Gr standard Pressure. I then changed back to the 230 gr for the recoil reason's. I'll try to do some testing of all three, and post back. May be a while though.
"fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen." [Warren v. District of Columbia,(D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981)]
If I have to explain it, you wouldn't understand
July 1st, 2008 11:17 AM
To clarify your numbers a bit. From Remington's web site, the listed velocities are:
GS 185 grain standard -- 1015These were all from a 5" barrel. They show no +P load for the 230 grain GS and I don't believe they make one for that round. I may be wrong but I can find no reference to one.
GS 185 grain +P -- 1140
GS 230 grain standard -- 875
To your actual question. Using numbers from Remington's chart, the 185s would hit harder than the 230.
185 grain standard -- 423 ft. lbs.Energy is energy and in anyone's book, 423 (or 534) is greater than 391 and assuming that none of the bullets over penetrate and pass through the target, the lighter bullet will hit harder as it has more energy to transfer to the target. The difference will come in the amount of penetration as the heavier bullet will hold onto it's energy longer which should translate to deeper penetration and a larger wound channel. Talking only about the GS rounds as that is what your question was about, if I were using standard pressure rounds, I would opt for the 230 grain as the 32 ft. lbs. of energy difference is not that great but if you throw the +P round into the question, I would opt for the 185 grain load. 143 ft. lbs. difference would be too much for me to discount. JMHO.
185 grain +P -- 534 ft. lbs.
230 grain standard -- 391 ft. lbs.
Sig 239 SAS 40 S&W / Sig 239 9mm / Kahr PM-9 / Walther PPS .40 / Sig P-245 / Ruger LCP
Beretta Tomcat / Walther PPK / BDA 380 / Taurus 85 / Kel-Tec PF-9 / Am. Derringer 357 NRA Life MemberMy Web Site
July 1st, 2008 11:52 AM
230gr. HST + P feed perfectly through the XD45 Service. A little more recoil.
July 1st, 2008 02:30 PM
One of the best things about 45ACP is that it will do the job with nearly any ammo you feed it. If all I had to shoot was a light weight JHP, or a 230g FMJ, I still have confidence in the gun.
Given my choice, I load +P 230g JHPs.
"If we loose Freedom here, there's no place to escape to. This is the Last Place on Earth!" Ronald Reagan
July 1st, 2008 09:50 PM
With the exception of my 1911, I tend to prefer 200+P--either Gold Dots or TAP (G30 & G36).
They get good velocity out of shorter barrels, yet still have good weight for penetration.
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men.--RAH
...man fights with his mind; the weapons are incidental.--Jeff Cooper
There is a reason they try and make small bullets act like big bullets--Glockmann10mm
Search tags for this page
185 gr vs 230 gr
185 grain vs 230 grain
185 grain vs 230 grain 45
185 grain vs 230 grain ammo
185 vs 230
185 vs 230 grain
230 gr vs 185 gr
230 grain vs 185 grain
230 vs 185
230 vs 185 45 ammo short barrel
45 185 vs 230
glock 30 230 grain velocities
Click on a term to search for related topics.