Difference in Wolf ammo?
This is a discussion on Difference in Wolf ammo? within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; is there a real difference in wolf ammo when it comes to
124grain FMJ 7.62x39mm Military Classic
WOLF Performance Ammunition - WOLF Military Classic
and
...
-
October 21st, 2008 12:20 AM
#1
Member
Array
Difference in Wolf ammo?
is there a real difference in wolf ammo when it comes to
124grain FMJ 7.62x39mm Military Classic
WOLF Performance Ammunition - WOLF Military Classic
and
122grain FMJ 7.62x39mm Polyformance
WOLF Performance Ammunition - WOLF Polyformance
and dont say the difference is 2 grains 
they are priced the same
GUN CONTROL IS USING BOTH HANDS
I believe its a shoulder thing that goes up - Carolyn McCarthy (D)
The muzzle end of a .45 pretty much says go away in every language.
-Clint Smith
-
October 21st, 2008 12:20 AM
Remove Ads
-
October 21st, 2008 03:49 AM
#2
VIP Member
Array
The military classic comes in a tactical camouflage box
"Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country,"
--Mayor Marion Barry, Washington , DC .
-
October 21st, 2008 08:13 AM
#3
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
dukalmighty
The military classic comes in a tactical camouflage box
Yep, thats the only difference I can see too, other than 2 grains 
_
"Government is not the solution to our problem; government IS the problem". - Ronald Reagan 1981
-
October 21st, 2008 08:24 AM
#4
Senior Moderator
Array

Originally Posted by
dukalmighty
The military classic comes in a tactical camouflage box
...and its 66 FPS faster giving it that military tactical edge.
"Just blame Sixto"
2*
M&P Doc- Just ask.
-
October 21st, 2008 12:52 PM
#5
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
SIXTO
...and its 66 FPS faster giving it that military tactical edge.
Err, the polyformance is rated @ 2396fps, the military at 2330.. Just saying.
In the end the poly gives ~60 ft/lbs more muzzle energy. For the same price, it's your call, it's a 4% increase. I prefer heavier, slower rounds, but thats OMO
The muzzle end of a .45 pretty much says, "Go Away" in every language.
Fast is fine, accuracy is final. Learn to be slow in a hurry.
"I never met a man that had been in a gunfight and wished that he had a smaller gun. Ever."
-
October 21st, 2008 02:15 PM
#6
Senior Member
Array
You all probably know this stuff, but I'd rather start from the beginning so I don't forget a step --
Wolf started as a green lacquer coated round, then they got complaints about sticking in AR chambers so they went to the gray poly coating.
Then, they couldn't get enough production for demand, but they could still get the "old" green ammo. To differentiate, they called it Military Classic. And it cost less than the black box Wolf.
Then, the plant making the green ammo started shifting to gray..... the last time we opened black box and camo box ammo, they looked identical (that was maybe a week back, most recent shipment from Wolf). Cost went right up to the black box.
I am sure I've left some out because it's been a while since I heard all of the Wolf story, but the end result will probably be that everything will have the gray coating. No idea on the boxes though.
Hope this helps. They both seem to shoot the same to me.
-
October 21st, 2008 05:44 PM
#7
VIP Member
Array
I find that when I shoot Wolf thru Glock 26 it smokes to much.
-
October 21st, 2008 09:24 PM
#8
Ex Member
Array

Originally Posted by
David III
You all probably know this stuff, but I'd rather start from the beginning so I don't forget a step --
Wolf started as a green lacquer coated round, then they got complaints about sticking in AR chambers so they went to the gray poly coating.
Then, they couldn't get enough production for demand, but they could still get the "old" green ammo. To differentiate, they called it Military Classic. And it cost less than the black box Wolf.
Then, the plant making the green ammo started shifting to gray..... the last time we opened black box and camo box ammo, they looked identical (that was maybe a week back, most recent shipment from Wolf). Cost went right up to the black box.
I am sure I've left some out because it's been a while since I heard all of the Wolf story, but the end result will probably be that everything will have the gray coating. No idea on the boxes though.
Hope this helps. They both seem to shoot the same to me.
Sounds like the best info to me! I don't see much difference actually. Only Wolf ammo I shoot is the match 22lr's. I have more than enough Norinco to last quite a while. I do have some green steel case of Russian decent that is not legible for a brand name or manufacturer. Most of which has a steel core. That would be these in the blister paks.
-
October 22nd, 2008 10:38 PM
#9
Distinguished Member
Array
I have had bad experience with Wolf ammo in general and would not recommend it. The biggest thing is that the cheap Wolf .223 is too lightly loaded to ever cycle my 16" AR. With the longer barrel ARs it cycles but jams plenty.
I don't have an AK so I can't know for sure about 7.62x39, but I still wouldn't trust it.
"Trust in God with hand on sword" -Inscription on my family's coat of arms from medieval England
---Carry options: G26/MTAC, PF9/MiniTuck, PPK/Pocket, USP40/OWB---
---NOTE: I am not an expert. If I ever start acting like a know-it-all, please call me on it immediately.

---
-
October 22nd, 2008 10:44 PM
#10
Ex Member
Array

Originally Posted by
GWRedDragon
I have had bad experience with Wolf ammo in general and would not recommend it. The biggest thing is that the cheap Wolf .223 is too lightly loaded to ever cycle my 16" AR. With the longer barrel ARs it cycles but jams plenty.
I don't have an AK so I can't know for sure about 7.62x39, but I still wouldn't trust it.
I will say this. I pick up more seemingly unfired Wolf ammo in .223 when I visit my local range than anything else. Seriously.
-
October 22nd, 2008 11:00 PM
#11
Distinguished Member
Array

Originally Posted by
HITCH KING
I find that when I shoot Wolf thru Glock 26 it smokes to much.
I think it's designed for good cheap plinking ammo.
-
October 22nd, 2008 11:10 PM
#12
Distinguished Member
Array
I've fired over 3,000 rounds through my guns (2000 through two .45's and the other 1000 through the SKS). I've had zero FTF, FTE, etc. It is accurate (for it's purpose) in my guns. I don't think it smokes any more than other commercial cartridges. I've hear it's dirty. DUH! What round doesn't leave a residue in your barrel? I clean my firearms after each range session so the primer and related residue isn't an issue. I cannot attest to any other calibers, but I've shot both the black box and the camo box in each weapon without issue. It's good to plink with and I've got a bunch of it if SHTF. It goes bang every time and it WILL punch through clothing and skin if needed.
Tim
BE PREPARED - Noah didn't build the Ark when it was raining!
Si vis pacem, para bellum
________
NRA Life Member
-
October 23rd, 2008 03:17 PM
#13
Member
Array
The web links also say "Mil-Spec sealant around case mouth" for the Military Classic, if that's any big deal.
I just started shooting 7.62 recently, so no extensive experience, but it works fine in the Saiga. I've been told by folks on other forums to stay away from it in handgun calibers since 1) it's filthy, and 2) the steel casing can contribute to feeding and/or extracting issues.
Best used in the commie guns it was designed for, I guess.
Freedom ... must be fought for, protected, and handed on ... or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free. -- Ronald Reagan, 1967
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By fernset in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 34
Last Post: March 4th, 2010, 11:53 PM
-
By cmb in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 34
Last Post: October 4th, 2009, 11:06 PM
-
By del slo team in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 14
Last Post: March 30th, 2008, 09:50 PM
-
By sdr7871 in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 35
Last Post: September 3rd, 2007, 01:04 AM
-
By crankshop1000 in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 11
Last Post: July 6th, 2007, 09:13 PM
Search tags for this page
polyformance vs military classic
, wolf polyformance
, wolf polyformance 7.62x39
, wolf polyformance review
, wolf polyformance vs military classic
, wolf wpa polyformance
, wpa military classic 7.62x39 review
, wpa military classic vs performance
, wpa polyformance
, wpa polyformance .223
, wpa polyformance 223
, wpa polyformance 223 review
, wpa polyformance 7.62x39
, wpa polyformance 7.62x39 review
, wpa polyformance vs military classic