RBCD Ammo controversy - Page 3

RBCD Ammo controversy

This is a discussion on RBCD Ammo controversy within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by AutoFan There is no controversy. It is marketing hype and junk science. Really light bullets with a very low sectional density traveling ...

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 116
Like Tree15Likes

Thread: RBCD Ammo controversy

  1. #31
    VIP Member Array Majorlk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Naugatuck, CT
    Posts
    2,406
    Quote Originally Posted by AutoFan View Post
    There is no controversy. It is marketing hype and junk science. Really light bullets with a very low sectional density traveling really fast will slow down really fast, especially after expanding. It will not penetrate deep enough to do any real damage. And the explanation about the bullets sensing the temperature or makeup of the target is BS. How does it sense these things? How does the bullet change its behavior as a result? And how does it do this in the milliseconds between firing and impact? The answers are it can't.
    I have a hard time believing any police department would swallow this nonsense.
    An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. - Robert A. Heinlein


  2. #32
    VIP Member
    Array TX-JB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    5,739
    Quote Originally Posted by Majorlk View Post
    I have a hard time believing any police department would swallow this nonsense.
    Maybe not believe it but could still adopt it, especially if they were given a large amount of this ammo, or made a "sweetheart deal" on it. Remember, most government purchases are from the lowest bidder.
    "Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas!".... Sam Houston

    Retired LEO
    Firearms Instructor
    NRA Life Member

  3. #33
    VIP Member Array Majorlk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Naugatuck, CT
    Posts
    2,406
    Quote Originally Posted by TX-JB View Post
    Maybe not believe it but could still adopt it, especially if they were given a large amount of this ammo, or made a "sweetheart deal" on it. Remember, most government purchases are from the lowest bidder.
    Isn't that how many departments wound up with Glocks - sold at below cost to "get their foot (I mean barrel) in the door"?
    An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. - Robert A. Heinlein

  4. #34
    Senior Member Array HowardCohodas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canton, OH
    Posts
    899
    DocGKR says that Bob Pilgrim, the author of the referenced article, is the pseudonym of a well respected retired FBI agent that he knows personally. M4Carbine.net Forums - View Single Post - More Lemas BS...

    I don't think the observations of a man with Mr. Pilgrim's background that even DocGKR respects can easily be dismissed.
    Howard
    I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop!!
    Politically Incorrect Self Defense

  5. #35
    Member Array Randy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Staunton, Va.
    Posts
    307
    Howard, I'm running a little slow this morning and don't understand what you mean in your post. Can you elaborate?

    Randy

  6. #36
    Senior Member Array HowardCohodas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canton, OH
    Posts
    899
    Quote Originally Posted by Randy View Post
    Howard, I'm running a little slow this morning and don't understand what you mean in your post. Can you elaborate?

    Randy
    There were several statements in this thread that seem to contradict the observations made by the article's author. My point is that these observations should not easily be rejected based on the reference that DocGKR provided.
    Howard
    I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop!!
    Politically Incorrect Self Defense

  7. #37
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,028
    Howard - Man, I respect you from over at the USCCA, but I don't get what you trying to learn here? The folks who make this ammo have been shown to be liars - they lie about what their bullets are made of - as one of the other members here showed when he took the bullet apart.

    Over at warriortalk, they ran some of these bullets through chemical analysis - no magic powdered metals, just plain old lead for the most part.

    It's just a very fast, very light JSP bullet. No magic - just basic physics. You get a nasty, but shallow wound.

    Might it work? Sure. Should you use something that doesn't meet the minimum 12" penetration? I don't. If someone is attacking you, your shots will likely hit their hands and/or arms before even reaching their torso. Penetration is important - second only to shot placement.

    Why do folks/departments who should know better use this stuff? All I can say is, when things don't make sense...I suspect you would need to follow the money.
    CallMaker likes this.
    The more good folks carry guns, the fewer shots the crazies can get off.
    www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
    Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger SP101, LCR, LCP (2), Mini 14; Marlin 336 .30-30; Mossberg 500
    CT Lasers

  8. #38
    VIP Member
    Array OPFOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nomad
    Posts
    4,713
    I wouldn't use the stuff if it was a magic fairy ray of uber death, just based on the complete and utter LIES (and there is no other word for them) used in their claims and advertising. The makers/manufacturers are beneath contempt, and I won't use anything that they're a part of, period.
    CallMaker likes this.
    A man fires a rifle for many years, and he goes to war. And afterward he turns the rifle in at the armory, and he believes he's finished with the rifle. But no matter what else he might do with his hands - love a woman, build a house, change his son's diaper - his hands remember the rifle.

  9. #39
    Member Array Randy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Staunton, Va.
    Posts
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by HowardCohodas View Post
    There were several statements in this thread that seem to contradict the observations made by the article's author. My point is that these observations should not easily be rejected based on the reference that DocGKR provided.
    Who is DocGKR?

    Randy

  10. #40
    Senior Member Array HowardCohodas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canton, OH
    Posts
    899
    Quote Originally Posted by Randy View Post
    Who is DocGKR?

    Randy
    He is the lead "industry professional" in debunking the marketing hyperbole relative to this ammo. His report was referenced in my OP.

    Part of what motivates me to continue poking at this issue is that nearly all the negative remarks about this ammo deal with their misleading marketing. I am intrigued by the observations of its performance made by the retired FBI agent who wrote the article referenced in the OP and observations made by Dr. Vail, a trauma surgeon. I am further intrigued by the fact that a respected PD chose this ammo.

    I have asked DocGKR, who knows the retired FBI agent who wrote the article to contact him and get the back-story of his report. Also, as an "industry professional" he would have some credibility if he contacts the Coral Gables PD to see what due-diligence they performed in making this choice. Even though he is the leading detractor, I'm assuming he is sufficiently professional to report what he finds with minimum prejudice.
    Howard
    I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop!!
    Politically Incorrect Self Defense

  11. #41
    VIP Member
    Array shooterX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,848
    If he provides you with the information you requested, please share it with us. I have pulled this ammo from my firearms as previously stated, however, I am very interested in hearing more about the article in your OP.

  12. #42
    OD*
    OD* is online now
    Moderator
    Array OD*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Coopersville
    Posts
    11,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Randy View Post
    Who is DocGKR?

    Randy
    Dr. Gary K. Roberts, D.D.S., LCdr. USNR, he's one of the nations foremost wound ballistics experts.
    CallMaker likes this.
    "The pistol, learn it well, carry it always ..." ~ Jeff Cooper

    "Terrorists: They hated you yesterday, they hate you today, and they will hate you tomorrow. End the cycle of hatred, don’t give them a tomorrow."

  13. #43
    Senior Member Array HowardCohodas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canton, OH
    Posts
    899

    Scientific Evidence for "Hydrostatic Shock"

    Scientific Evidence for "Hydrostatic Shock"

    by Michael Courtney, PhD, Ballistics testing Group
    and Amy Courtney, PhD, United States Military Academy

    The entire paper is very understandable and is well worth reading. Some interesting quotes:

    Debates between bullets that are “light and fast” vs. “slow and heavy” often refer to “hydrostatic shock," which describes remote wounding and incapacitating effects in living targets in addition to tissue crushed by direct bullet impact. Considerable evidence shows that “hydrostatic shock" can produce remote neural damage and rapid incapacitation.
    Recommendations

    The FBI recommends that loads intended for self-defense and law enforcement applications meet a minimum penetration requirement of 12” in ballistic gelatin.[8] Maximizing ballistic pressure wave effects requires transferring maximum energy in a penetration distance that meets this requirement. In addition, bullets that fragment and meet minimum penetration requirements generate higher pressure waves than bullets which do not fragment. Understanding the potential benefits of remote ballistic pressure wave effects leads us to favor loads with at least 500 ft-lbs of energy.

    With a handgun, no wounding mechanism can be relied on to produce incapacitation 100% of the time within the short span of most gunfights. Selecting a good self-defense load is only a small part of surviving a gunfight. You have to hit an attacker to hurt him, and you need a good plan for surviving until your hits take effect. Get good training, practice regularly, learn to use cover, and pray that you will never have a lethal force encounter armed only with a handgun.
    Howard
    I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop!!
    Politically Incorrect Self Defense

  14. #44
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,028
    Hi Howard - I read that article a while back. The most interesting thing to me is that while what they call a "pressure wave" can contribute to terminal effect, they still recommend the primary consideration be: hitting your target; and a minimum of 12" penetration.

    The issue is that ammo like RBCD does not meet the 12" standard.

    "Pressure wave" is also not the same thing as "hydrostatic shock." The latter refers to permanent wounds caused by the temporary stretch cavity (the tissue gets stretched too far and/or too fast) - generally happens only with rifle bullet-type energy levels.

    "Pressure wave" refers to a wave that travels through the large arteries around the heart (so, shot placement in the upper chest is key) to the brain. IIRC, it only has enough energy to cause damage for about 18" or so, so hitting someone in the femoral artery in the leg isn't going to do it. The hits need to be near the heart.

    Any bullet that stops inside the target will transfer all its energy, whether that happens via fragmentation or expansion.

    The authors (to their credit) agree that "pressure wave" doesn't always happen, and doesn't always work to stop the threat - thus their recommendations.

    In the end, this is a very fascinating discussion of terminal ballistics. But, it doesn't really change anything - hit your target in the high chest, and use a bullet with at least 12" penetration (that will hopefully stop inside the target).
    The more good folks carry guns, the fewer shots the crazies can get off.
    www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
    Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger SP101, LCR, LCP (2), Mini 14; Marlin 336 .30-30; Mossberg 500
    CT Lasers

  15. #45
    VIP Member
    Array shooterX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,848
    I think the safest thing to do is use ammo that has been proven, both by testing and real world use, the makers of RBCD, from my own research, haven't provided enough data, or any, to suport their claims.

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. RBCD ammo Platinum Plus 60gr./ or Magsafe
    By ascendmfg in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: April 22nd, 2012, 03:23 AM
  2. Anybody tested RBCD Ammo
    By TwoRavens in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: April 20th, 2012, 08:31 PM
  3. RBCD what can ya tell me???
    By ph0enix in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 17th, 2009, 10:51 PM
  4. RBCD question?
    By Redeye in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: April 4th, 2007, 01:04 AM

Search tags for this page

lemas ammo
,
rbcd
,

rbcd ammo

,
rbcd ammo for sale
,
rbcd ammo review
,
rbcd ammunition
,
rbcd ammunition ballistics
,
rbcd ammunition for sale
,
rbcd bullets
,
rbdc ammo
,
rcbd ammo
,
what is rbcd ammo
Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» DefensiveCarry Sponsors