.357-Which Round?

This is a discussion on .357-Which Round? within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; If you have a 4 in. barrel and a 2 in. barrel revolver, and you have a choice between 125 gr. or 158 gr. ammo, ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: .357-Which Round?

  1. #1
    Member Array Bart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    480

    .357-Which Round?

    If you have a 4 in. barrel and a 2 in. barrel revolver, and you have a choice between 125 gr. or 158 gr. ammo, would you use the same ammo in both guns or different ammo in each gun? Please explain your reason of choice. Thanks.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member Array cvhoss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,045
    For a self defense round, I'd use the 125 gr. loads for both. Very little energy difference between the two rounds and the 125 would be less likely to over-penetrate while giving a little better recoil management. If I were hunting, I'd switch to the 158 in a soft point for increased penetration.

    Hoss
    Sig 239 SAS 40 S&W / Sig 239 9mm / Kahr PM-9 / Walther PPS .40 / Sig P-245 / Ruger LCP
    Beretta Tomcat / Walther PPK / BDA 380 / Taurus 85 / Kel-Tec PF-9 / Am. Derringer 357

    NRA Life Member
    My Web Site

  4. #3
    Distinguished Member Array Rugergirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,954
    Probably the 125 grain, but before I made a decision I would want to see some ballistic test results. I would make my choice based on the round with the best velocity, penetration and expansion.
    Short barrel guns don't develop velocity as well as a longer barrel, often you get better results with a lighter faster bullet.
    Disclaimer: The posts made by this member are only the members opinion, not a reflection on anyone else, nor the group, and should not be cause for anyone to get their undergarments wedged in an uncomfortable position.

  5. #4
    VIP Member
    Array shooterX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,849
    I use 125gr in my .357 mag and some 130 gr. low recoil hydro-shoks on hand.

  6. #5
    VIP Member Array Cuda66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    minnesota
    Posts
    2,274
    I'm going to go against the stream on this one; I'd prefer the lighter 125's in the 4" gun--for the previously given reason of overpenetration...but take the heavier 158's in the short barrel in order to get enough penetration.
    There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men.--RAH

    ...man fights with his mind; the weapons are incidental.--Jeff Cooper


    There is a reason they try and make small bullets act like big bullets--Glockmann10mm

  7. #6
    Member Array MgoBlue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    143
    For the 4" barrel, either round would probably work as advertised. The issue, however, is with your shorter barrel revolver. I'd recommend probably bypassing .357 and go with .38special -- specifically the Speer Gold Dot JHP 135gr +p cartridge. This round achieves good velocity for a short barrel gun (~860 fps) and can be managed much more easily for follow-up shots from a short barrel gun.

    Here's more information on the round.

  8. #7
    Member Array Air,Land&Sea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    A Blue State
    Posts
    368
    I've never met a .357 Mag round I didn't like, but for personal defense I like the mid-powered Corbon DPX 125 gr. It's quite a treat and there's a nice write-up on www.hipowersandhandguns.com .
    Freedom of speech does not excuse one from freedom of thought.

  9. #8
    MLC
    MLC is offline
    Member Array MLC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    44
    my 6" 686 is a range gun 99.9% of the time so it probably hasnt had a whole box of SD ammo through it in the 25 years i've had it. my 2" model 60 gets feed gold dolt short barrel 135 gr. 357 mag or 38 special +p exclusively because they are supposedly designed to expand at lower velocity. hope that helps.

  10. #9
    Member Array forestranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    318
    My two K frames loaded with Win 145 Silver Tip and J frame with 125 Golden Saber 357.
    Reason: one of the K frames has fixed sights and the ST shoots dead-on. Avgs 1150-1180fps out of the two and I shoot them well. The GS produces 1140fps out of J frame and it shoots well for me.

  11. #10
    Ex Member Array BikerRN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    State of Discombobulation
    Posts
    5,253
    I agree with cvhoss:

    [BFor a self defense round, I'd use the 125 gr. loads for both.][/B]
    The old 125 grain .357 has been called "Thor's Hammer" before because of how it hits.

    Biker

  12. #11
    Member Array Marvin Knox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    seattle, washington
    Posts
    250
    +1 on 125gr. with a bullet tailored for the speed generated for your barrel length's ability to burn the powder involved.

    Fortunately the DPX mentioned does the job in both barrel lengths. There is no problem with penetration, it mushrooms widely and dependably, AND it is highly manageable for a .357 round IMO.

    What more is needed? It is IMO the perfect .357 magnum ammo for concealed carry.

  13. #12
    Member Array Bart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    480
    Quote Originally Posted by Cuda66 View Post
    I'm going to go against the stream on this one; I'd prefer the lighter 125's in the 4" gun--for the previously given reason of overpenetration...but take the heavier 158's in the short barrel in order to get enough penetration.
    All of the replies here make good sense, however, I agree with you about the 125's in the 4 in. & 158's in the short barrel. My reasoning is in relation to the link below. Although the barrel length is not designated, I assume the statistics are of that of a long barrel. All considered, the 158 gr. expands more and penetrates deeper, making it the better choice for the short barrel.



    357 Magnum Stopping Power

  14. #13
    VIP Member Array Eagleks's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    7,601
    I use 158 gr Federal Hydro-shock, Gold Dot Short barrel, or Hornandy Critical Self Defense

  15. #14
    VIP Member Array Superhouse 15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,055
    After testing, I found the 158gr Hydra Shok to fragment and not penetrate a lot. I had thought about using it for a hunting load. It's one of the few Hydras I'm not a fan of (.32ACP is the otherBTW). For short .357s I like the 125gr Gold Saber. Although it's not marked as such, it's a mid-power load. The 145 Silvertip as mentioned is also quite mild. I don't have much experience with the DPX, but those who do seem to like it. I don't care for full power .357 recoil in short guns. For the 4", all my guns have full power 125gr JHP. I don't much care between Federal, Remington, or Winchester, I think they're all great. Power and penetration are not an issue and the bigger gun makes it a lot better to shoot.

  16. #15
    Member Array Marvin Knox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    seattle, washington
    Posts
    250
    I'm sure that there are many good rounds for the .357 magnum, with both short and longer barrels. I just settled in on the DPX and 125 gr. because of a few glowing reports.

    I hate to keep switching around with ammo for carry and just wanted to settle in on something that seemed to be about as good as it gets.

    Having said that - I have always been a believer in larger and heavier over the little fast bullets - in general. I have heard however that the 158gr. (often) will fail to open up when fired at the reduced speed of the shorter barrels. Others seem to disagree and, indeed, espouse the oposite view.

    I respect the testing and conclusions of Stephen Camp. He seems honest and is a "thinker". Sometimes you just have to settle in on a pretty well recommended round and just go for it. I'm betting that most of the most modern choices will do the job if you hit where you are aiming to hit.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Round two...
    By A1C Lickey in forum Bob & Terry's Place
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: January 18th, 2010, 08:56 PM
  2. Round or no round?
    By kspilot536 in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 29th, 2009, 08:33 PM
  3. Which round is best?
    By Bart in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: April 22nd, 2009, 11:16 PM
  4. 5.56 vs 5.45 round
    By ExactlyMyPoint in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: December 15th, 2008, 03:47 AM
  5. Round Two with the M&P9C
    By limatunes in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: March 14th, 2008, 10:16 PM

Search tags for this page

.158 grain out of snub
,

.38 ballistic test 158gr penetration expansion

,
357 145 stopping power
,
357 ballistics picture
,
357 hydroshock balistics
,
357 magnum 130 grain hydroshock
,
federal 130 grain 357 magnum ballistics
,
federal 130 grain 357 magnum short barrel ballistics
,
federal 158gr. 357mag.hydra-shock report in short barrels
,
good velocity for 158gr 357
,

hydroshock .357 sig

,
which .357sig round?
Click on a term to search for related topics.