December 11th, 2009 11:54 PM
Failures to Stop!
I am very interested in what calibers and loads work and don't work. I'd love to hear your "War Stories" regarding your first hand knowledge on how well specific calibers and loads worked or didn't. Thanks to all !
You can leave names out of course.
December 12th, 2009 02:21 AM
Any comprehensive list of gun incidents will reveal large calibers failing to stop and small calibers doing it in one shot. It's not about caliber (within reason), it's about shot placement. If I shoot a bad guy between the eyes with a 9mm, he will be just as dead as if I did it with .45. Considering all of the variables that one has to deal with in a shooting situation, the caliber of the gun should be pretty far down the list of priorities. There was just a story on the news about a guy who killed two people, one shot each with a .380. A story earlier this year had a guy getting shot an insane number of times with a .40 and living.
It's like real estate, location, location, location.
December 12th, 2009 06:06 AM
At the end of the day it boils down to shot placement, as torgo1968 said.
The simple truth is that almost all handgun calibers simply poke holes in people. The only variables we can play with as far as handgun ammunition goes is controlling it's expansion, penetration, and accuracy after deflection. At the end of the day, they're just a hole poking round.
Rifle ammunition on the other hand is the real "bread and butter" when it comes to how well they work. Rather than just poke holes in a target, the rifle ammunition often absolutely tears up the target.
I'm sure this isn't exactly the type of reply you are looking for, but in a way it is. I hope you have a good day, and remember to practice often.
December 12th, 2009 07:11 AM
Shot placement is King. Anything 9mm on up should have no problem penetrating normal clothing and making a deep enough hole to damage vital organs if well placed. The stories about 22 LR killing with one shot are around, and they do happen - but they are not the norm. I am pretty convinced that 9mm, .40 or .45 have a much higher shot to stop ratio than .22 LR in defensive scenarios.
Some people will tell you that .22 has killed more people than any other round in the US, I would imagine a very large number of those are hunting accidents and accidental shootings in the house.
Stick with 9mm, .38, .357, .40, .45 with a quality hollowpoint and you will be fine.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
December 12th, 2009 08:32 AM
There is a good study from the FBIs firearms training unit, the Handgun Wounding Factors and Effectiveness or HWFE, a study in handgun wounding factors. It covers the shot placement aspect, caliber and likelihood of actually hitting your target.
If you are not familiar with the document I highly recommend anyone considering carrying a gun to read it at least once. You can download a pdf copy at the link above.
December 12th, 2009 09:12 AM
shot placement is king....
December 12th, 2009 09:14 AM
+1 for shot placement and a .380 in your pocket is better than a .45 at home any day.
"In a crisis, you will not rise to the occasion, but you will default to the level of your training."
December 12th, 2009 09:17 AM
The above is a good read.
My take: any caliber can make a "1-shot stop", even a .22 short; any caliber can fail to stop with multiple rounds, even a .45. So very many variables...
Placement is king; penetration, however, is queen...doesn't do any good to perfectly place the round if the bullet doesn't get to vitals.
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men.--RAH
...man fights with his mind; the weapons are incidental.--Jeff Cooper
There is a reason they try and make small bullets act like big bullets--Glockmann10mm
December 12th, 2009 09:57 AM
Agree with shot placement. When I was deciding which shot shells to load my home defence shotgun with I googled " one shot kill " ; " best home defence shot gun loads " ; etc. What I came to the conclusion is that if you want to stop a 7 foot, 250 pound, high on pcp, charging at you attacker than your shot needs to disrupt the central nervious system. Brain or spinal cord.
I load my mossberg with OOO Buck.
December 12th, 2009 10:19 AM
Well, if your attention span is good and you like details on the subject, perhaps this will be a good Saturday morning read.
Series index: "Self defense, stopping power, and caliber" | Ammunition, General gun stuff, Techniques & Training | GRANT CUNNINGHAM
“Monsters are real and so are ghosts. They live inside of us, and sometimes they win.”
~ Stephen King
December 12th, 2009 06:33 PM
In Fact, it is even more complicated
This statement is true, but only AFTER the bad guy dies.
Originally Posted by torgo1968
Dr. Vincent Di Mayo did a research study some twenty-five years ago about 'handgun effectiveness'. The study was based on his career as a Medical Examiner. Does anyone see the faulty premise here? All his information came from a dead body on a slab, not a live body in the process of a fight.
Someone mentioned the statistic regarding .22 long rifle being a greater killer than anything else. Part of that is due to a person being shot without much effect and ignoring the wound. The person later dies of gangrene or other infection; but because of being shot. That's not very comforting to the other party in the fight.
Much depends on the condition and attitude of the person being shot. Someone setting in a rocker after a good meal, watching a National Geographic travel show is much easier to take out than the same person enraged and intent on mayhem.
The standard self-defense scenario is to defend from an attacker. In the normal course of events, an attacker is excited and intent. Even without drugs or alcohol, adrenaline alone provides some degree of pain resistance and tolerance.
It is unquestionably true shot placement is a very key factor. However, in the turmoil and excitement of an attack and fight, perfect shot placement is not always possible.
One of the key factors in stopping an attacker (other than a perfect central nervous system hit) is blood loss. The more blood one loses, the weaker one gets. Big diameter bullets normally cause a greater sized hole and therefore more blood loss than a smaller diameter bullet. On this same thought, a sharp shouldered (or edged) bullet will tear more blood vessels than a rounded or smooth bullet. Therefore, an expanded bullet with sharp edges, or a large diameter bullet with sharp edges (think wadcutter or semi-wadcutter) are more useful in this regard than a smooth RNL or RNJ bullet.
Without writing a term paper here, the best choice for handgun self defense is as large caliber as one can normally handle. The rounds used should be either expanding or flat fronted. That type of round insures the greatest amount of blood loss and the best possibility of a CNS disruption.
A good hit with a small caliber beats a miss with a big caliber.
A good hit with a large caliber beats a good hit with a small caliber.
A mediocre hit with a large caliber is a whole lot better than a mediocre hit with a small caliber.
Small calibers do not guarantee good hits.
And read the tag line.
December 12th, 2009 06:46 PM
Yes, I agree that shot placement is the key and it needs penitration to get to the vitals.
The argument about calibers/bullet types/ammo capacity in the gun will go on forever.
The original "police special" was a smith in.32 S&W caliber with round nose lead bullets. Now days, this would be considered a "mouse"load. However, the cops shot bad guys and they died. Maybe had to empty it into the BG but they died.
Then the cops went to .38s. Again with pound nose lead ammo. A bit more power, and again, it sufficed.
Then, about in the early 70s, ammo manufacturers came up with better ammo for the existing .38s: Silvertip, hydrashok, etc. Now the 38 is a formidable weapon. Did the job.
But wait! Now the BG has a 9 with 18 shots in it and 2 more clips in his pocket, Vs the cops 38 with 6. Now all the cop shops have to have a 9 (or 40 or 45) with big ammo capacity. Everybody seemed to want a lot of shots available. Studies showed that the police gunfight scenerio is 2.2 shots at 21'. If you don't get the BG with the first 2, he can use the gun he took off your body for the other 16 shots.
Maybe a bit sarcastic, but the fact is: you gotta connect with the first 1 or 2, or he will get you. In my opinion, training of shot placement is more important than what you are shooting with.
I, personally, would not carry anything less than a 380 for SD, and load it with high performance ammo. Then go train and practice with it. Remember, you have to conceal it. ( I am only 5'7")
Lastly, what works for military or police combat situations is not necessarily what works for the average person CC for SD. A big gun on the hip of a cop is a deterant; we need something we can conceal, so the act of surprize is on our side. A big gun "printing thru" advertises that you have something the BG can take away before you can get it out.
December 12th, 2009 09:18 PM
I AGREE that good shot placement greatly enhances the effectiveness of a bullet. However, I have noticed that in most fights people have a the odd habit of refusing to stand still and often hiding behind cover or concealment making placement very difficulty. I also know, from nearly pulling the trigger on a BG, that shot placement is much easier on a qualification range due to the massive adrenaline dump.
So, rather than theory, I am asking people what actually worked or didn't for them when they had to pull that trigger.
December 12th, 2009 09:36 PM
Awhile back we had a thread started by a fellow who got into a gunfight with a shotgun wielding nut-neighbor. He went against the shotgun with a .45 and somehow lived to tell about it. The point of the story though was that several .45
hits didn't stop the guy.
December 12th, 2009 10:13 PM
This is not theory: counting on someone "bleeding out" to stop hostilities is ridiculous. Blood loss takes time-even with large projectiles.
CNS damage and shock (not hydrostatic shock) are what stop people.
Therefore, almost any caliber can be sufficient with proper placement. A larger caliber/more powerful weapon gives you a tiny advantage, but not much.
By HeadHunter in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Last Post: November 17th, 2011, 09:18 AM
By LanceORYGUN in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: March 17th, 2011, 03:12 AM
By HeadHunter in forum In the News: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Last Post: October 1st, 2010, 07:35 AM
By AtlantaSW40 in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
Last Post: June 4th, 2010, 02:52 PM
By poundfoolish in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: December 15th, 2009, 08:36 AM
Search tags for this page
40 cal ammo failures to stop bad guys
px4 failures with the ri police dept
the 22 long rifle has killed more people than any oher caliber
why did providence ri drop beretta px4?
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors