9mm vs 40 cal Winchester Ranger Bonded
This is a discussion on 9mm vs 40 cal Winchester Ranger Bonded within the Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Anyone check out the comparison tool on Winchesters website?
http://www.winchester.com/SiteCollec...law_bullit.swf
It looks to me that the 9mm performs as good if not better than the ...
-
January 27th, 2010 10:28 PM
#1
Member
Array
9mm vs 40 cal Winchester Ranger Bonded
Anyone check out the comparison tool on Winchesters website?
http://www.winchester.com/SiteCollec...law_bullit.swf
It looks to me that the 9mm performs as good if not better than the 40 cal through Denim and heavy cloth. It expands just as well and sometimes more and doesn't over penetrate where the 40 cal might. Is my assessment correct?
Also I am not saying that the 9mm is a better self defense round. It just looks like if you use Winchester Bonded Rangers, it may be. Keep in mind I am by far no expert in what is/isn't a good defense round.
-
January 27th, 2010 10:28 PM
Remove Ads
-
January 27th, 2010 10:36 PM
#2
VIP Member
Array
Ammunition has come a long way since the .40 cal was developed.
Many members here feel quite comfortable carrying 9 mm with good SD loads for daily carry. I am one of them.
Just remember that shot placement is much more important with what you carry than how big a bang you get with each trigger pull.
www.ddchl.com
Texas CHL Instructor
Texas Hunter Education Instructor
NRA Instructor
-
January 27th, 2010 10:52 PM
#3
Distinguished Member
Array
I still am sticking with my .40cal... I need the extra bang for when I'm up north... I only want to have to shoot wild dogs and coyotes once or twice, not 5+... I've done my own euro pellet testing (9MM) vs. 4ocal. I'm sticking with what Law Enforcement Uses. 40S&W! sorry... not convince to switch
-
January 27th, 2010 11:08 PM
#4
VIP Member
Array
Magazine <>
clip - know the difference
martyr is a fancy name for
crappy fighter
You have never lived until you have almost died. For those that have fought for it, life has a special flavor the protected will never know
-
January 28th, 2010 06:21 AM
#5
Senior Member
Array

Originally Posted by
SIGguy229
Pass me some of that, will you? I brought the pepsi.
"Stand your ground, don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here!" - John Parker April 19th, 1775 Lexington, MA
Μολών λαβέ!
-
January 28th, 2010 07:49 AM
#6
Ex Member
Array
I have a 9mm, a .40, and a .45. I feel comfortable behind all of them. I'd prefer the .40 or .45 just because they are bigger and have more capacity than my PM9 but I know the 9mm will get the job done with Speer +P 124gr.
-
January 28th, 2010 09:05 AM
#7
Member
Array
I feel very comfortable with a 9mm, with good ammo, & would not trade up to a .40. If I had a .40, I wouldn't trade down to a 9mm, either.
There was a gunfight between police & a local murderer near here, 2 weeks ago. A cop took 1- 9mm round to the mouth, killing him, & police shot him 5-6 times thru the windows of his car. He survived & will be tried.
" Shot placement."
-
January 28th, 2010 09:08 AM
#8
VIP Member
Array
I prefer the 147gr 9mm, but it's still good to see the numbers for the others. Thanks for the link.
"He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." – Luke 22:36
"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." – Thomas Jefferson
-
January 28th, 2010 09:23 AM
#9
Member
Array
I'll stick with my 40 cal. A 9mm has been proven in combat for years, it even replaced the venerable .45 acp for our troops. Can't really say why, but I just feel more comfortable carrying a 40 cal for personal defense over a 9mm. It is as infentile as the 40 cal bullet is bigger than 9mm. I know...a 45 and 50 cal is bigger than a 40.
That being said, everyone has a personal preference, that's why they make so many different calibers in so many different weights.
Blessed be the Lord my rock who trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle. Psalm 144:1
-
January 28th, 2010 09:31 AM
#10
Senior Member
Array
I agree with the shot placement idea. A .50AE to the foot is better than a .380 to the heart/face.

Originally Posted by
drjavelina
it even replaced the venerable .45 acp for our troops.
But don't you think that was the least bit political? We switched to a NATO round...
-
January 28th, 2010 09:35 AM
#11
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
BlueNinjaGo
I agree with the shot placement idea. A .50AE to the foot is better than a .380 to the heart/face.
But don't you think that was the least bit political? We switched to a NATO round...
I agree the switch from the 45 to 9mm was political. In this current time being politically correct is more important than effective results.
Blessed be the Lord my rock who trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle. Psalm 144:1
-
January 28th, 2010 09:40 AM
#12
Member
Array
What ever you feel comfortable with. If someone invaded my home and all I had next to me was my Mk II, I would be confident that it will get the job done. Of coarse a .22lr would be far from my first choice for defense if given a choice.
-
January 28th, 2010 10:20 AM
#13
Distinguished Member
Array
Thanks Joepa for posting that link.
-
January 28th, 2010 10:53 AM
#14
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
cammo girl
Thanks Joepa for posting that link.
No problem :)
I thought it was interesting.
-
January 28th, 2010 11:39 AM
#15
Senior Member
Array
In their data the 9mm looks great. I have done my "backyard" testing with wet phonebooks, waterjugs, etc. I always find the 9mm to make a smaller hole with deeper penetration. The holes and damage into phonebooks look the same between .40 and .45apc.
I cary .40 most of the time and 9mm on occasion. I like using .40 because it is the same caliber that all local LEOs use. There are marginal differences between handgun calibers when compared to a long gun. With the right ammo, all are good.
G-23, 27, 35 (all .40)
G-29 10mm
Smith M&P .45 Compact
H&K 45c
Les Baer Thunder Ranch 5"
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By Red Cell in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 7
Last Post: October 1st, 2011, 07:53 PM
-
By CMR in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 4
Last Post: February 28th, 2010, 03:44 PM
-
By Eddie A. in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 2
Last Post: February 9th, 2008, 05:12 PM
-
By QuickDrawMcGraw in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 7
Last Post: January 10th, 2008, 07:26 PM
-
By AzQkr in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
Replies: 1
Last Post: July 17th, 2006, 09:58 AM
Search tags for this page
40 cal ballistics vs 9mm
, 40 cal vs 9mm
, 40 cal vs 9mm ballistics
, 9mm 40 cal comparison
, 9mm vs .40 ballistics test
, 9mm vs .40 cal ballistics
, 9mm vs .40 cal ballistics test
, 9mm vs 40 ballistics test
, 9mm vs 40 cal
, 9mm vs 40 cal ballistics
, 9mm vs 40 caliber ballistics
, ballistic comparison 9mm vs 40 cal
, ballistics 40 cal vs 9mm
, ballistics 9mm vs 40 cal
, compare 9mm to 40 cal