Stopping Power

Stopping Power

This is a discussion on Stopping Power within the Defensive Books, Video & References forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Today I got two new books in the mail. The books are both by Marshall and Sanow, with me mostly looking at "Stopping Power" so ...

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Stopping Power

  1. #1
    Member Array mauser1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    226

    Stopping Power

    Today I got two new books in the mail. The books are both by Marshall and Sanow, with me mostly looking at "Stopping Power" so far. I was a bit put off by the price , but figured what the heck it is a reference manual on defensive rounds. The book at 342 pages is a well documented and informative book, and almost every page is new information. I think that of all the books that I have gotten about defensive guns that this book might very well become one of my favorite, even though it is just about bullets, and not guns. This is a well written reference manual, that will be dog eared before I get it all digested. I know that I will also pass this book around to my shooting group, to much information in one place not too.


  2. #2
    JD
    JD is online now
    Administrator
    Array JD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    19,238
    Be careful with that one, the work therein has been largely discredited.

  3. #3
    Member Array Skippys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by JD View Post
    Be careful with that one, the work therein has been largely discredited.
    just wondering, why do you say that? never heard of the book nor the authors. any references on why it's been "largely discredited?" again, just wondering.....

  4. #4
    JD
    JD is online now
    Administrator
    Array JD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    19,238
    Here's a couple of articles for starters, there's tons of debate on this topic, I'm not looking to stir the pot, just making people aware that before citing this info, look really hard at some of the following articles.

    The Marshall & Sanow "Data" - Statistical Analysis Tells the Ugly Story

    Book Review By Martin L. Fackler, MD

    Marshall & Sanow's stats - believe it or not? State your case here.

    A couple of articles here: Home

    Fackler, Marshall and Handgun Stopping Power tests

  5. #5
    Member Array Pale Horse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Southern Florida
    Posts
    27
    As a paramedic who has run on a great many gunshot wounds, I don't really know how much credibility to place in the lab people.

    I've transported enraged felons who were instantly stopped by a .25 from a cheap raven, and drug-crazed felons who were shot three times by a .357 Magnum before they stopped their violence.

    I always place my trust in shot placement. A .38 Special allows me to recover faster than the brutish .44 Magnum which, incidentally, beats up my wrists and elbows. I practice more with my 9mm and my .38 Special since it doesn't beat up my joints and because smaller calibers are easier to use when engaging multiple opponents, as follow-up shots can be cranked out faster.

    In my work experience, shot placement was always more relevant to stopping a criminal than the caliber of the weapon. In fairness, there are some exceptions that I'm omitting from this post . . . like a 12 gauge shotgun which trumps all but, then again, we're only talking about handguns in this thread.

    I pick my stuff based on my work experience, not on what I read in a book from a ballistics lab.

    All my best.

  6. #6
    Distinguished Member Array jumpwing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    1,271
    See, I could have saved you all that money by sharing the truth: 45 ACP

    (Come on... SOMEbody had to say it...)

    Seriously, though, Pale Horse is right: placement trumps all ballistics.

    "The flock sleep peaceably in their pasture at night because Sheepdogs stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
    cafepress.com/bgstudios

  7. #7
    Member Array mitocondriac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    dallas, tx
    Posts
    164
    Now people who have seen it is what i like to hear about.
    So If Guns Kill People Do Pencils Miss Spell Words???

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Array gasmitty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    10,571
    Quote Originally Posted by JD View Post
    Be careful with that one, the work therein has been largely discredited.
    I would say "contested" rather than discredited.

    The observations of Marshall & Sanow are not really in dispute, although their conclusions are.

    Not trying to stir the pot here, but the major detractors of Marshall & Sanow (Fackler et al) are also not above reproach in their findings, although they clearly have science on their side.
    Smitty
    NRA Endowment Member

  9. #9
    Member Array Blownsvt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    208
    Quote Originally Posted by jumpwing View Post
    See, I could have saved you all that money by sharing the truth: 45 ACP

    (Come on... SOMEbody had to say it...)
    ah yes.....you mean God's caliber. I am carrying a full load of .45 acp on my hip as i type this

  10. #10
    Member Array Pale Horse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Southern Florida
    Posts
    27
    As far as stopping power goes, there is, evidently, a lot of controversy about 'hydrostatic shook' and a lot of experts who claim it doesn't even exists, or, if it does, that it's a minor factor in stopping a criminal.

    As far as my work experience goes . . . I don't know but I suspect that HS is a big deal in at least some shootings.

    Mas Ayoob wrote about a gelatin experiment in the 4th edition of Combat Handgunnery where pig aortas were suspended in ballistic gelatin (maybe like fruit in Jello?) and rounds were fired into the gelatin some distance from the pig aortas. As you may have suspected, the pig aortas were, indeed, severed even though the bullet track was nowhere near them.

    If hydrostatic shock is BS, then why do fish float dead to the top of the water when stupid idiots through explosives into lakes?

    I have seen people die from seemingly superficial gunshot wounds, but I have no way of deciding--given the circumstances--if it was from hydrostatic shock.

    What are your thoughts?

    Best,

    ---Kevin

  11. #11
    VIP Member Array Superhouse 15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,055
    as a Paramedic and gun guy, I think there is a lot of good information in those books. Probably the argument over the difference between a 80% and 81% rated load is bogus, but there's lots to be learned from those books.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Do you really have enough stopping power?
    By Sig35seven in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: July 21st, 2010, 09:59 PM
  2. Stopping Power
    By ErikGr7 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: January 8th, 2009, 01:21 AM
  3. Another Stopping Power Question
    By SugarmillMan in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: June 26th, 2008, 05:23 PM
  4. Stopping Power
    By crzy4guns in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: March 31st, 2008, 08:44 PM
  5. Handgun Stopping Power
    By DCJS Instructor in forum Reference & "How To" Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 11th, 2007, 07:54 PM

Search tags for this page

mas ayoob pig experiment
,

placement trumps all

Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» DefensiveCarry Sponsors