Two-Tone Sig P239 as an EDC

This is a discussion on Two-Tone Sig P239 as an EDC within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Hi everyone. This is my first question, so take it easy on me if you could. I did a search, but didn't find anything. I ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Two-Tone Sig P239 as an EDC

  1. #1
    Member Array TankerTruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Douglas, MA
    Posts
    18

    Two-Tone Sig P239 as an EDC

    Hi everyone. This is my first question, so take it easy on me if you could. I did a search, but didn't find anything.

    I recently moved to MA (marriage - she's hot so it's worth it), and have just obtained my CC license. I previously lived in NY where 'guns were bad' and the politicians know more than the people, so I didn't have the option to CC. But now I do!

    Anyway, I'm considering buying a Sig P239 (9mm) as an ED CCW, and I was wondering if the two-tone would make consealing the weapon any harder. The cost is almost the same, and my wife called the two-tone 'sexy', which means 'sure honey, spend the extra money, I don't mind' in my mind.

    I know it's kind of a dumb question, but I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything in my thinking that the two-tone wouldn't be an issue at all.

    I will be carrying whatever weapon I get in either the Crossbread or MTAC holster, so I will be tucking the shirt over the weapon most of the time (I'm mostly dressed 'professional', as our office calls it, which means suitcoat and tie most days). I doubt the two-tone would prove problemattic, but having only ever owned matte black weapons, I thought I should ask some more knowledgable people their opinion.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member
    Array OldVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    S. Florida, north of the Miami mess, south of the Mouse trap
    Posts
    15,721
    Get what you like and ignore the rest. If it's covered, why the concern? Besides, the wife said to. Part of that love, honor, and obey thing--go get it!
    Retired USAF E-8. Remember: You're being watched!
    Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... "For What It's Worth" Buffalo Springfield

  4. #3
    Administrator
    Array SIXTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    19,620
    With modern day finishes, stainless amounts to nothing more than aesthetics. As far as concealing, I don't think it matters much. Perhaps stainless would be easier if you wore white dress shirts.

    If that is what you like, have at it. That is a fine choice in a carry weapon.
    "Just blame Sixto"

  5. #4
    New Member Array fostersgrn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    2
    As stated, a SIG 239 is a very fine "carry". Color means nothing IMO while concealed. If you "flash it" well what are you doing with it to begin with.

    I carry a Sig239 SAS402B. As long as you asked. A "shiny slide might give you away if you FUP or even worse drop your gun while making adjustments.

    If the clothes dont support the holster and dont cover "right" then leave the gun in the car or at home. I like dark black/blue guns because they do "hide" better and are more forgiving for FUP's. Yeah I done some in my time. BUT not in public.

    $10.22 cnts, plus 28% tip!

  6. #5
    Member Array BAGMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Area 51
    Posts
    188
    I think two-tone guns are classy looking. I don't think it'll make a difference either way as far as concealing goes. I have a nickel 9mm that used to be my EDC and never had a problem with concealment.
    "Leave the gun. Take the cannoli" Clemenza

  7. #6
    Member Array Teufle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    77
    I've been debating sending my P220 off to have a "reverse" two-tone done to it. Like it just fine the way it is, but I agree that two-tone does have a refined look to it. Especially on Sigs. My .02.

  8. #7
    VIP Member Array ccw9mm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    25,762
    Quote Originally Posted by TankerTruck View Post
    I was wondering if the two-tone would make consealing the weapon any harder.
    Thinking out loud ...

    Imagine you're wearing dark pants, dark (or dark print/pattern) shirt, with a darker covering garment. If you go with black, then in those conditions where your garments are all of darker colors you'll find it easier to blend in. Of course, any other time, a black gun will be contrasting with your garment colors. Depends on your wardrobe, I guess.

    Me, I prefer black guns, dark holsters. I think the darker colors fade into the background, tend to blend better. But then, I've had several people notice me carrying openly when doing so, even with darker clothing.

    If you're forced to cover up anyway, it doesn't really matter.
    Your best weapon is your brain. Don't leave home without it.
    Thoughts: Justifiable self defense (A.O.J.).
    Explain: How does disarming victims reduce the number of victims?
    Reason over Force: The Gun is Civilization (Marko Kloos).
    NRA, GOA, OFF, ACLDN.

  9. #8
    Member Array TankerTruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Douglas, MA
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by ccw9mm View Post
    Imagine you're wearing dark pants, dark (or dark print/pattern) shirt, with a darker covering garment. If you go with black, then in those conditions where your garments are all of darker colors you'll find it easier to blend in.
    This was my thinking too, as I wear black pants pretty much every day (it's an architect thing, just look at the pictures of architects online... you have to wear black all of the time). I wear colored dress shirts or polo shirts on days where I go to job sites (usually pretty bright, with stripes since black pants are so... well... boring), so I think the stainless slide might be OK.

    Given the holster I have planned covers most of the weapon (outside of 1" of the slide and the black grip), and I have to fully conceal it, I think it's definately an option. Thanks for the quick responses.

  10. #9
    Senior Member Array Freedomofchoice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wesley Chapel, Florida
    Posts
    1,028
    The Sig 239 is a very fine firearm; I have one. Two tone makes absolutely no difference as far as concealed carry goes.

    I know you did not ask for opinions on the gun, but as an owner of a 239 of feel compelled to give you my opinion. My gun has been 100% flawless, but, I just think there are better choices for carry. The 239 is is rather heavy and does not really carry a lot of ammo, and costs a good chunk of money. If you like Sig, you can get a 250 in two tone and it weighs only 25 oz. and holds 16 rounds. With the $250 you'll save over the 239 you can buy a lot of ammo! You can read my review / range report here: http://www.defensivecarry.com/vbulle...ge-report.html

    I just bought a Ruger SR9C which is very slim, two tone and very "sexy". I personally think either of these guns are a better choice than the 239. I got this gun from Bud' and paid $389. Great carry gun.



    .

    Too light for heavy work, too heavy for light work!

    pb

  11. #10
    Senior Member Array imthduke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    753
    Same gun in different cal.
    I think any BG deserves to be shot with a nice looking gun.
    http://www.treasureislandbedandbreakfast.com
    Ed Brown Kobra Carry | HK P7M8, P2000sk, P30s | Sig P238, P239SAS, 1911 C3, P232, P938 | Colt Defender, Mustang Pocketlite, 1911 | Rohrbaugh R9 | Kimber Covert Ultra II | Browning HP, Buckmark 22LR(suppressed| Walter PPK(1966) | Kahr PM9 Black Rose |

  12. #11
    Member Array TankerTruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Douglas, MA
    Posts
    18
    I'm not dead-set on the sig, but looking to make sure I wasn't missing anything along the lines when I was selecting.

    I'm from MA, so the P250 isn't an option right now, as it isn't on the A.G. imaginary list of approved firearms, from what I can tell. I'm checking tonight with my local dealer, but I'm pretty sure it's not.

    I'm not sure on the legality of the Ruger in MA either, but I'll definately check.

    I've narrowed my search down to 3 guns (and maybe a few more now), and I'm trying to figure out which one would be the best for every day carry for me. I've shot all 3, and really enjoyed all 3, but none of them really stood out as the best, in my mind.

    1. Sig P239 - it was the heaviest of the bunch, but it was the one I shot the best, which is why it stayed in the list. It was also the best looking (in two-tone). It fit my hand pretty well.
    2. S&W M&P 9c - it was the 'average' gun of the group, falling in between the other two on almost all fronts. It was nice, but not 'wow!', and I was accurate with it, but nothing tremendous. It was easy(ish) to conceal, but not super easy. The trigger was a bit mediocre, but the recoil was great. I think you get the idea.
    3. Walther PPS - it was my favorite looking (as I shot them), and was the smallest and lightest by far, so should be the easiest to carry. I shot well with it (similar to the 9c), and the recoil was super light for what I expected. I would have to make sure I sufficiently broke it in before I could depend on it. And I don't like the backstrap safety failing safe if it does break.

    I've always been a believer that safeties, if they fail, should fail unsafe... not sure why that is actually, I guess so the gun can still fire no matter what... of course, I'm not sure if that's the smartest thing now that I write it.

  13. #12
    VIP Member Array MitchellCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    I don't post here anymore...Sorry
    Posts
    2,333
    Quote Originally Posted by TankerTruck View Post
    Hi everyone. This is my first question, so take it easy on me if you could. I did a search, but didn't find anything.

    I recently moved to MA (marriage - she's hot so it's worth it), and have just obtained my CC license. I previously lived in NY where 'guns were bad' and the politicians know more than the people, so I didn't have the option to CC. But now I do!

    Anyway, I'm considering buying a Sig P239 (9mm) as an ED CCW, and I was wondering if the two-tone would make consealing the weapon any harder. The cost is almost the same, and my wife called the two-tone 'sexy', which means 'sure honey, spend the extra money, I don't mind' in my mind.

    I know it's kind of a dumb question, but I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything in my thinking that the two-tone wouldn't be an issue at all.

    I will be carrying whatever weapon I get in either the Crossbread or MTAC holster, so I will be tucking the shirt over the weapon most of the time (I'm mostly dressed 'professional', as our office calls it, which means suitcoat and tie most days). I doubt the two-tone would prove problemattic, but having only ever owned matte black weapons, I thought I should ask some more knowledgable people their opinion.
    You will be fine, but just make sure to blouse out the shirt a bit, and wear nice shirts with some texture in them, and darker colors.

    Have your wife pick out shirts from Geoffrey Beene for you.

  14. #13
    New Member Array BobFr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    7
    I carry a two-tone 239 SAS Gen 2 in .357SIG and love it. It's similar to Imtheduke's but with added Crimson Trace grips instead of wooden ones. I bought both the Supertuck in horsehide and an MTAC. Unlike many, I ended up preferring the Supertuck -- to me it is more comfortable and drawing the pistol is smoother than the MTAC. But I know others have the opposite opinion. I have several SIGs, so I have become familiar with their manual of arms, especially the SIG double action-single action trigger. This made the decision easier for me, but I do shoot this 239 as accurately as any of my other pistols (they're all more accurate than I am, however!). I think the mass of this pistol contributes to it's relatively low recoil and good accuracy.

    Depending on the caliber you select, there are factory 8 round magazines in .357 that have a little more finger hold (they're only about 1/4 inch longer than the standard 7 round ones) and make the grip more comfortable to me. The .40S&W is only available in 7 round ones. However, I had to buy the firearm in .40 and then separately the factory .357 barrel to get my .357 choice. It all depends on what is available at the time.

    The Crimson Trace grips, besides adding the laser, have small finger notches in front that also in my opinion make the grip more comfortable.

    With this said, I think you would be happy with any of the pistols on your list. As you train with your choice, it will become "natural" to you, and you'll appreciate it.

  15. #14
    Member Array JimK68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    18

    Sig P239

    The pistol has some +'s and some -'s but in my opinion the +'s far out weigh the -'s by a very long margin.
    The 239 carries wonderfully and really really hugs your body with either of the holsters you mentioned thus making it very, very concealable and extremely comfortable. I have had and carried the P239 in 40 cal for several years and recommend it very highly.
    Good luck,
    Jim
    45 ACP: SP 1911 TRP, Sig P220compact, HK 45c
    40 cal: S&W M&P 40c
    9mm: Sig 239, Sp EMP, HKP7M8, HKP7 PSP
    380 ACP: Sig 232, Bersa T, Colt Gov series 80, Colt Pony Pocketlite, Ruger LCP
    22 LR: Ruger SS MKIII Hunter, Colt Fronteer Scout 22lr/mag, Walther PPK 22lr, PP22lr, P22, S&W 317, S&W 34-1

  16. #15
    Distinguished Member Array Rexster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    SE Texas
    Posts
    1,772
    I carry multi-tone P229s on a regular basis. The first run of the P229 SAS were all two-tone.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Two-Tone Sig P239 as an EDC
    By TankerTruck in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 15th, 2010, 04:33 PM
  2. Sig Porn - P239 SAS Gen 1 DAK Two Tone
    By cranesrule in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: October 10th, 2009, 09:26 PM
  3. WTS FTF in NC Sig 226 Two-tone
    By 18DAI in forum Member Buy, Sell & Trade
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 24th, 2009, 11:51 AM
  4. Bi-tone XD .45's
    By buckeye .45 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 26th, 2008, 02:50 AM

Search tags for this page

edc p239
,

p239 edc

,
p239 for edc
,
ruger sr9cc
,
s&w revolver or p239 for edc
,
sig p239 as edc
,

sig p239 edc

,
sig p239 for edc
,

sig p239 two tone

,

sig p239 two tone 9mm

,
sig p239 walther ppk
,
sig sauer p239 edc
Click on a term to search for related topics.