This is a discussion on pictures of bullets from water jug tests within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by BlueNinjaGo Nice pictures... might not represent what they'd do in flesh, but i think it's nice to see. Anyone here have a ...
While it may not add a lot to its lethality, not many rounds I have ever seen were any more impressive than these:
Did these a couple of years ago in water jugs
![]()
“I am consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry.”
- Barack Obama Chicago Tribune, April 27, 2004
Those would be my ammo of choice in every handgun I own.![]()
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
-Thomas Jefferson
Laws are restrictive but sometimes necessary to maintain a civil society. Rights are nonrestrictive but are always necessary to maintain a free society.
Great photos, 9mmPro. Thanks for following up and posting them.
I'd hate to be wounded by anyone of those rounds..!!
What we've got here is failure to communicate.
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
-Thomas Jefferson
Laws are restrictive but sometimes necessary to maintain a civil society. Rights are nonrestrictive but are always necessary to maintain a free society.
Oops... I meant for human replica's... Like how they use them on Mythbusters and Deadliest Warrior. I just remember my biology teacher telling us that the pig is the closest animal to a human being. (Excluding primates I guess.) I figured a pig might be easier to get a hold of versus ballistic gel.
What such a test will tell us is how far any given bullet will penetrate if we're ever attacked by upright-walking pig zombies.
The pig carcasses that Mythbusters and such use are drained of blood; therefore, the tissue won't have the same composition as a living, breathing homo sapiens; not only that, but they've also been eviscerated, s you don't have all those nice gushy organs to chew through.
It sure does look cool on camera, though.
Using a round against a live animal can give some slightly better insight...
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men.--RAH
...man fights with his mind; the weapons are incidental.--Jeff Cooper
There is a reason they try and make small bullets act like big bullets--Glockmann10mm
Ive gotten way more expansion out of both the federal and gold dots in 124 grain when shot into 2 wet phone books placed together. If your going to try and compare bullets make sure they all are the same grain.. Velocity and mass play a big role, of course a light 115grain bullet traveling several hundred feet per second more than a heavy 147 grain bullet will be more "expanded" aka deformed when hitting water or an object.
I think most would agree that any of the main brand names in 124 grain will do the job and that seems to be the most popular and tested which provides the best balance in velocity and mass.
Array
Ditto! I remember hitting popped a few times as a kid with BBs. I never said, "Is that all you've got?" and asked for seconds. That's why I don't put much heart into caliber or bullet selection. I don't think anyone wants to get shot by anything.
A HP is probably better for SD than a FMJ, but not always. But then, I love a .45 ACP and think any bullet out of it will do the job.
Retired USAF E-8. Avatar is OldVet from days long gone - 1978. Oh, to be young again...
Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... "For What It's Worth" Buffalo Springfield
As far as tests go this is an interesting website:
The Box O' Truth - Ammo Penetration Testing
SA XD9SC...13+1 is hard to beat!
Still think you guys ought to get out there and do some hunting. I shot a ground hog 6 times this afternoon with 9mm Hydashocks, 147 gr. Poor shot placement on my part, he snorted and went back down the hole. I am sure he died.
On the other hand I have killed many groundhogs with one shot from a 22 rifle.
Shot placement > ammo