380 or 38 Special for pocket carry. Pick one. - Page 4

380 or 38 Special for pocket carry. Pick one.

This is a discussion on 380 or 38 Special for pocket carry. Pick one. within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Razor, you know for a fact? I'm impressed....

View Poll Results: 380 or 38 special for pocket carry?

292. You may not vote on this poll
  • 7 rounds of 380

    118 40.41%
  • 5 rounds of 38 Special

    174 59.59%
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 80
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: 380 or 38 Special for pocket carry. Pick one.

  1. #46
    Member Array Mike in VA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Razor, you know for a fact? I'm impressed.

  2. #47
    Ex Member Array 21bubba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike in VA View Post
    Razor, you know for a fact? I'm impressed.
    According to S&w rep's the J-frame is still their most popular selling pistol.

  3. #48
    Senior Member Array cockedlocked01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    If I pocket carry, it'd be the .380. I'd rather carry the .38, but would use other carry methods (K.L. Null SMZ shoulder holster or a high ride OWB holster) instead, although I carried one in an ankle holster for yrs as a BUG.

    My experience on this is having & carrying a S&W 442 & a Kel-Tec P-32.

    Because of improvements in bullets, I do believe the .38 has the advantage in power & I do think they make better BUGs due to their simple system. However, a small .380 (& .32 for that matter) is smaller (Flatter, shorter, lighter usually, & more capacity) plus easier/quicker reloads, so the decision isn't as easy as it may seem.
    "Use human means as though divine ones didn't exist, and divine means as though there were no human ones." Baltasar Gracian
    Integrated Close Combat
    NRA Member
    Glock 19 & 26, Kahr CM9 & P45, Para P12, Kel-Tec P-32, S&W 442, & Dan Wesson 14-2.

  4. Remove Advertisements

  5. #49
    VIP Member
    Array oneshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    +42.893612,-082.710236 , Mi.

    If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished.
    I would rather die with good men than hide with cowards
    If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans
    Don't ever think that the reason I'm peaceful is because I don't know how to be violent

    M&Pc .357SIG, 2340Sigpro .357SIG

  6. #50
    VIP Member Array TWO GUNS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    If it was for my primary carry gun I would go for the J Frame.But if it is for my BUG I would go for the P3AT.
    Have Fun and Shoot Straight !!

  7. #51
    Senior Member Array Lewis128's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Cape Girardeau, Mo.
    I'd prefer the .38, with a couple of exceptions.
    1. No porting for me thanks. Porting may help with recoil, but it also makes the BANG considerably louder. It can also interfere with your vision in low-light situations as part of the muzzle flash is directed upwards into your line of sight.

    2. I'd go with a lighter gun. Charter Arms makes several variations that weigh in at 12 oz, 3 oz lighter than the S&W. It's not a major consideration, I admit, but as a bonus, you can put the savings towards a case of ammo.

  8. #52
    PM is offline
    Senior Member Array PM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Truth, I want both!! I went with the .380 for the extra 2-3 rounds in the gun and quicker reload. That and I shoot bottom feeders better. If someone gave me a .38 special I would not turn it down, (anyone who would like to send me one please feel free to PM me!!). That's just me!! You also said pocket carry. I would be more likely to carry a 38 IWB or OWB than in my pocket again just me.
    Last edited by PM; April 10th, 2010 at 09:14 PM. Reason: Added WB carry remark

  9. #53
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    It's easy to pocket carry a .380, along with a few spare mags.

    I usually carry 2 spare mags for my LCP, for a total of 19 rounds. Hard to do that with a revolver.

    As far as arguments about "power" and "caliber" go...put the bullets where they count, and use bullets that penetrate 12-15 inches.

    All else is just interesting conversation.
    The number of people killed because they didn't have "enough gun" is dwarfed by those who had none at all.

  10. #54
    New Member Array Chazman1946's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007

    Take the LCP

    I'm a retired Chicago Police Detective, I have been carrying concealed weapons my entire adult life.

    I used to carry off duty a nickel plated S&W Chief airweight, it fit fairly well in my rear pants pocket. Problem is it only carries 5 shots, and is not real handy to reload.

    When the Ruger LCP came out I jumped on one and have been carrying it ever since. It is light weight, virtually undectible with a pocket holster and with a 6 round magazine with one in the pipe, gives you 2 more rounds then the revolver, and is infinitely easier to reload with a spare magazine.

    I live in Arizona and with the warm weather here I wear shorts almost the entire year, I carry the LCP in my front right hand pocket in a DeSantis "Nemisis" pocket holster and it doesn't even fell like I'm carrying at all.

    I have put over 500 rounds through this gun with multiple brands of ammo, hardball and hollow points, and never had one misfire or jam. The gun is absolutely as reliable as a revolver, and more accurate then my Chief!

  11. #55
    Member Array billinmiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    sw miss.
    Here's Doc (GKR) Robert's take on this:

    BUG's: .380 ACP vs. .38 Sp - M4Carbine.net Forums

  12. #56
    Distinguished Member Array Knightrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    I would take a .38 over .380s any day for the week.
    Sig Sauer: P938 9mm Smith and Wesson: Sigma SW9VE 9mm

  13. #57
    Member Array eldorado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Heathrow, FL
    I also have a choice LCP, LCR, 442 Airweight wins all the time, front pocket done.

  14. #58
    Member Array docholliday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    I could make a case for either one but I currently have a 642 j-frame. It fits my hand a little better.

  15. #59
    Member Array tdd78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    +1 on J-frame revolvers. S&W 340 M&P - front pocket carry in a Milt Sparks PCH-RI holster works just fine for me!!

  16. #60
    Senior Member Array Landric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Kansas City Metro
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike in VA View Post
    Revolvers are nearly dead as defense weapons. I don't think they'll ever die, because they are so simple, but police dropped them for a reason (make that several reasons).
    Aah, but the real question is: were they good reasons? The primary reason given for the "auto revolution" in law enforcement that started in the late 1980s is the police being "outgunned" by the criminals. A lot of that was Hollywood, not reality, but when the police were actually outgunned it was more a result of not having the proper long guns for the task at hand, not the inferiority of the revolver to the semi-automatic pistol.

    That problem persists today, though now its more a function of a lack of understanding of when to deploy long guns, not their lack of availability. As an example:

    I went to a home invasion last night (drug related as the huge majority of them are) where it was unclear whether or not the suspect(s) were still on the scene. It was clear that they were armed with firearms when the robbery occurred. Technically it was the county's call, having happened about a half mile outside the city limits, but since that is still in our jurisdiction, we went too. All in all six units responded, three of us from the city PD, and three deputies. Now, this is the kind of call where the long guns should come out. We know weapons are involved and we know its possible the perps are still there.

    My department issues a Ruger Mini-14 and a Benelli Nova 12 gauge to every officer. The county doesn't issue rifles, but all their deputies have shotguns. Well, of the three of us from the PD, two of us had Mini-14s out and the other had the 12 gauge. Of the three deputies, not one had a long gun out.

    When one knows one is going in to trouble, one brings a long gun, not a handgun. When one reads about instances of LEOs being outgunned by criminals the lesson is nearly always the same, don't bring a handgun to a gunfight, bring a rifle or shotgun. Then bring some friends with rifles or shotguns. There were a lot of tactical errors in the infamous "Miami Shootout" of 1986, but the most glaring IMO was going after known armed, violent criminals, with only two shotguns and no rifles or submachineguns between 7 agents, not the agents mostly carrying revolvers.

    The same is basically true of the 1997 Bank of America shootout. What handguns the police had during that altercation was not the issue, the lack of available rifles was the issue. Had all the officers on scene been armed with revolvers instead of 9mm Berettas the results would likely have been pretty much the same. They needed rifles, not lots of rounds in pistol magazines.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike in VA View Post
    Personally, if I had to carry puny, I'd take the .380 way before I'd take a 5-shot. I do have an LCP, but it's backup only, and a backup ought to be little. The LCP can take the place of a reload for your 1911 or Sig, because they weight less than a reload for those weapons.
    The only advantage to carrying a little backup is to increase the chance of actually carrying the backup. Ideally, a BUG should be just as effective as one's primary weapon. After all, if things go so badly that one needs a BUG, then one is in a bad way and needs all the gun he can get his hands on.

    I've tried a number of small autos over the years and never found one that was as reliable as an Airweight revolver (though if anyone can make a reliable mini .380 it is Ruger). Quality revolvers are so reliable they are boring. Small autos, not so much in my experience. One rarely sees a "my J-frame is unreliable" post on the forums. Its a daily occurrence for someone to be posting about an unreliable mini-auto. Then one has to factor the .38 Special's ability to throw a bullet twice as heavy as a .380 bullet and the much broader selection of ammunition choices. For me the decision is easy between the two, the .38 Special snub. Of course I carry "nearly dead" revolvers are primary weapons on my own time, so what do I know?

    "The Engine could still smile...it seemed to scare them" -Felix

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Help me pick a new pocket gun.
    By '75scout in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: September 18th, 2014, 11:03 PM
  2. Warning: Electronic Pick Pocket
    By ArmyCop in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: December 13th, 2010, 05:44 PM
  3. 380 or 38 Special for Pocket carry
    By cuban11182 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: June 7th, 2009, 09:53 AM
  4. Pick me a pocket carry...
    By Foo909 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 71
    Last Post: October 6th, 2008, 01:54 AM
  5. Pocket Carry of Things You Normally Wouldn't Pocket Carry
    By Euclidean in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: July 18th, 2005, 12:15 PM

Search tags for this page

.380 vs .38
.380 vs .38 special
38 special pocket carry

38 special vs 380

380 special
380 vs 38

380 vs 38 special

is .380 the same as 38 special
is a .380 the same as a .38 special
pocket 38

pocket 38 special


pocket carry 38 special

Click on a term to search for related topics.