Sig P239 or Kahr K9 for IWB?

Sig P239 or Kahr K9 for IWB?

This is a discussion on Sig P239 or Kahr K9 for IWB? within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Your opinions please?...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Sig P239 or Kahr K9 for IWB?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array druryj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    653

    Sig P239 or Kahr K9 for IWB?

    Your opinions please?


  2. #2
    Distinguished Member Array coffeecup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Cadiz,Ky
    Posts
    1,331
    Dont own a P239, but do have a K-9 that I carry from time to time. The K-9 is a fine pistol and I have had absolutely ZERO problems with it--neve a hiccup with any ammo I have fed it. I have cut back on the re-loaded lead bullets somewhat because of the Poly rifling, but never had a problem with leading in the barrel even after shooting a couple of hundred rounds. The gun carries nicely IWB with the right holster. ACCURATE is the word for these pistols.

    All that said: I am sure that the P239 is also a very nice piece, as my experience with Sig has been great. Wish I could report that about every carry piece I have owned---sadly to say, I cannot.

  3. #3
    VIP Member
    Array sigmanluke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    3,209
    I prefer the P239 but that doesn't mean you will. Is thickness or weight a factor for you? The Sig will be heavier and thicker, but also more accurate and have less felt recoil. Quality and reliability have to go to the Sig as well. Price goes to the Kahr.
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
    Thomas Jefferson

  4. #4
    VIP Member Array tokerblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,355
    The Kahr K9 is going to be a littler slimmer and slightly lighter than the Sig P239. They are both good guns. I would try them both IWB and take them to the range to see which one you like better.

    If you're interested in the polymer P9, that's going to be almost 1/2 the weight of the Sig P239.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array mr surveyor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas, South of the Sabine
    Posts
    1,149
    I have a P239 in 40S&W and a Kahr CW9 ... pretty close to the carry width of the K9. I love the Sig, and don't mind the weight at all, but the width does get a bit uncomfortable IWB. The Kahr is much more comfortable IWB in my experience, and it gets carried more (by me) while the Sig stays home.


    surv

  6. #6
    Member Array GunKeen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    80
    You can see on this thread that I went through a similar dilemma: http://www.defensivecarry.com/vbulle...d.php?t=118246

    For IWB I wanted something thin, though, so I ruled out Sig pretty quickly (although a Sig is somewhere in my future). I've all but decided on a K9, especially since the standard K9s are now being shipped with the K9 Elite trigger that is on all of their guns.

  7. #7
    Administrator
    Array SIXTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    19,988
    Strictly on the carry portion, I'd go with the K9. The Sig is the better shooter IMO, but the Kahr is the better carrier.
    "Just blame Sixto"

  8. #8
    Distinguished Member Array ripley16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Quantico/ F'burg, VA
    Posts
    1,404
    The Kahr fits my hand better, but either one is a fine pistol. No bad choice here.
    Note; I think someone posted the news that the K9 now comes standard with the Elite trigger, not the longer NYPD trigger. The model number will have a "C" suffix if it has the NYPD trigger.

  9. #9
    Member
    Array kudzu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    109
    BTDT. I have a Sig 239 SAS Gen 2 and a Kahr P9, both are fine pistols, but for carry there's no contest, the thinner lighter Kahr wins hands down. The K9 is heavier than my P9 and the Sig 239 is heavier still. I thought the Sig was going to be my carry gun, but it is a safe and range queen. YMMV, of course.
    The Founders Got It Right - Back To The Constitution
    NRA (Life) - GOA (Life) - NAGR - GOSC (Life)

  10. #10
    VIP Member Array jwhite75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    5,319
    Quote Originally Posted by SIXTO View Post
    Strictly on the carry portion, I'd go with the K9. The Sig is the better shooter IMO, but the Kahr is the better carrier.
    This is my general opinion.
    Friends don't let friends be MALL NINJAS.


    I am just as nice as anyone lets me be and can be just as mean as anyone makes me. - Quoted from Terryger, New member to our forum.

  11. #11
    Distinguished Member Array Gideon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,787
    Combat or LEO and big enought hands to hold it; Sig all the way. For civlian concealed carry and perhaps smaller hands, K9 rules. K9 carries better than a 1911 (and that's saying a lot); has soft recoil, best feeling grip I've ever had and the best DAO trigger of any I've ever pulled. Isn't cluttered with controls. Only a slide release. The night sights that come on those are outstanding and they are exceptionally accurate. Mags are a bit expensive and a tad harder to load but that's the only down side. The SIG is heavier and a lot thicker; that doesn't mean a lot just picking one up in a store but carrying it and shooting it alot? Well then it makes a huge difference. I also have the P9 and it's the best carry gun I've ever owned even it's it has a bit more muzzle flip than the K9 due to how light it is.

    Gideon

  12. #12
    Member Array sentioch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    394
    I agree with everything that's been said....but I'll just point out one more obvious thing: the Sig P239 is MUCH prettier and has more cool factor
    "In a world of compromise, some don't." -HK

  13. #13
    Member
    Array kudzu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by sentioch View Post
    ...the Sig P239 is MUCH prettier and has more cool factor
    Maybe. But, as my mother used to say, pretty is as pretty does.
    The Founders Got It Right - Back To The Constitution
    NRA (Life) - GOA (Life) - NAGR - GOSC (Life)

  14. #14
    Senior Member Array druryj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    653
    Quote Originally Posted by sentioch View Post
    I agree with everything that's been said....but I'll just point out one more obvious thing: the Sig P239 is MUCH prettier and has more cool factor

    In other words...a better BBQ or Wedding Rehearsal gun?

  15. #15
    Senior Member Array mr surveyor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas, South of the Sabine
    Posts
    1,149
    I never thought of my plain black P239 as a "pretty gun". Functional, reliable, accurate, extremely well made.... yes.... but pretty?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Sig P239?
    By BigJerm80 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: May 26th, 2009, 09:38 PM
  2. Just got me a Sig P239 SAS DAK...
    By uflnuceng in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: January 26th, 2008, 08:21 PM
  3. Sig P239 vs. Kahr P9
    By KYmxracer52 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: August 4th, 2007, 10:34 PM

Search tags for this page

kahr k9
,
kahr k9 vs k9 elite
,
kahr k9 vs mk9
,

kahr k9 vs sig p239

,

kahr mk9

,
kahr mk9 vs sig p239
,
kahr pm9 vs sig p239
,
p239 vs
,

sig p239

,
sig p239 vs
,
sig p239 vs kahr
,

sig p239 vs kahr k9

Click on a term to search for related topics.