Kel Tec PF9 vs Kahr pm9 worth the large price difference?

This is a discussion on Kel Tec PF9 vs Kahr pm9 worth the large price difference? within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; thanks...

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 76
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Kel Tec PF9 vs Kahr pm9 worth the large price difference?

  1. #1
    Member Array martino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    67

    Kel Tec PF9 vs Kahr pm9 worth the large price difference?

    thanks

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    GM
    GM is offline
    VIP Member Array GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,866
    Yes absolutely!
    "The Second Amendment: America's Original Homeland Security"

  4. #3
    VIP Member Array crzy4guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,637
    IMHO - No. Kel Tec has cleaned up all of the issues that had plagued PF9 owners, and the small 9mm is now a pretty smooth running little pistol. So for about a $400.00 difference (YMMV) - I just don't see any justification, even though Kahr is a top brand.
    God bless our troops!

  5. #4
    Senior Member Array bunker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    work
    Posts
    797
    No. Use the extra $400 or so dollars towards a good holster, reloader for pistol shells, and a local gun club membership where you can get good, safe practice. The kel Tec PF9 is one of the better Kel Tecs on the market. JMHO. Bunker

  6. #5
    Ex Member Array azchevy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Oceanfront Property
    Posts
    3,850
    x3. Keltec is good to go

  7. #6
    GM
    GM is offline
    VIP Member Array GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,866
    Quote Originally Posted by crzy4guns View Post
    IMHO - No. Keltec has cleaned up all of the issues that had plagued PF9 owners, and the small 9mm is now a pretty smooth running little pistol. So for about a $400.00 difference (YMMV) - I just don't see any justification, even though Kahr is a top brand.
    If you shoot a PM9 and then a PF9 you will see the justification.
    "The Second Amendment: America's Original Homeland Security"

  8. #7
    Distinguished Member Array Der Alte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Goldsboro, NC
    Posts
    1,843
    I keep hearing about Kel Tecs problems with the PF-9. I bought one of the very first PF-9s and have never had it fail to fire or eject. Mine has served me well.
    Its a shame that youth is wasted on the young.

  9. #8
    VIP Member Array tokerblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,338
    Quote Originally Posted by GM View Post
    If you shoot a PM9 and then a PF9 you will see the justification.
    I agree.

    IMO, you should test fire each of them and you'll come to the conclusion of whether or not the PM9 is worth the price difference. They both can be reliable guns, but I much prefer the build quality and trigger of the PM9.

  10. #9
    Distinguished Member Array LanceORYGUN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    ORYGUN
    Posts
    1,517
    Quote Originally Posted by martino View Post
    thanks
    The Walther PPS is worth the price difference.



  11. #10
    Senior Member Array MichSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    526
    I would say for me the PM9 is worth the price difference.

  12. #11
    VIP Member Array jwhite75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    5,323
    IMO for what most users will actually use a small 9mm like that for, the KT is perfectly fine. However, the Kahr is the price iti s and ahs the rep it does for a reason.
    Friends don't let friends be MALL NINJAS.


    I am just as nice as anyone lets me be and can be just as mean as anyone makes me. - Quoted from Terryger, New member to our forum.

  13. #12
    Distinguished Member Array Gideon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,764
    I appreciate Keltecs and they're a decent value but the triggers are lousy. Shoot both and you'll know there's no comparison. The quality of the PM9 blows away the Keltec. The trigger on the PM9 is one of the best DAO triggers on the planet. the sights are WAY better, especially if you get night sights and I think you'll be surprised about the difference in felt recoil. The only thing I can say about the PM9 is the checkering is rough on my hands but I found the black pattern on the PF9 to also be hard on my hand. I can get three fingers on the Keltec and only two on the PM9 so that's another plus for the Keltec but I can shoot the PM9 a lot better and find it to be a more accurate gun. If I could only have one and was prone to keeping my guns, then I would definitely go with the PM9. If I had larger hands than I do and little money and no patience to save, I'd get the keltec but getting back to you question, are the differences worth the money? ABSOLUTELY...and then some.

    Gideon

  14. #13
    Member
    Array jbr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    148
    CW9 is a great alternative - Excellent quality and great value
    Great privilege comes with great responsibility.

  15. #14
    aag
    aag is offline
    Member Array aag's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    52
    I've just replaced PF9 with PM9. For me, it's worth the difference, even though PF9 (unlike P3AT which I've owned before) hasn't given me a single problem. Yet, I've never liked it.

    At the range PM9 is significantly more enjoyable to shoot. The recoil is manageable, and I don't feel like my hand is about to fall off after a 100 rounds. Also, PM9 can be pocket carried; PF9 is a bit longer -- still can fit in a pocket, but not as well. Fit and finish -- Kahr, unlike KelTec, doesn't look and feel like a DIY project (nor did I have to run sandpaper on Kahr grips to make it bearable to shoot -- something I *had* to do with KT).

    KT has one thing going for it -- price. If the budget is tight, it'd definitely do well for $300. If you can afford it -- go for the Kahr.

  16. #15
    Member Array HandgunWorld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    315
    PM9 definitely worth the price difference.
    Bob Mayne
    HandgunWorld Podcast
    www.handgunworld.com
    Suarez International Instructor

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. CKRT M16-13SF - worth the price?
    By Tangolima600 in forum Defensive Knives & Other Weapons
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: May 24th, 2010, 10:29 PM
  2. Hornady TAP 00 12ga worth the price?
    By Wasabi in forum Defensive Rifles & Shotgun Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: January 26th, 2009, 10:45 AM
  3. Price Lowered ~ LARGE Gryphon Knives Terzuola Combat Knife
    By QKShooter in forum Member Buy, Sell & Trade
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 27th, 2008, 10:03 PM
  4. S&W 1911PD - Worth the price?
    By Thumper in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: December 9th, 2007, 12:59 AM
  5. Are Custom Guns Worth The Price?
    By Tactician in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: January 5th, 2005, 11:32 AM

Search tags for this page

kahr cm9
,
kahr cm9 vs kel tec pf9
,
kahr pf9
,

kahr pm9 price

,
kahr pm9 vs kel tec pf9
,

kel tec pf9

,
kel tec pf9 price
,
kel tec pf9 vs kahr pm9
,
kel-tec pf9
,
keltec pf9
,
pf9 vs pm9
,
pm9 vs pf9
Click on a term to search for related topics.