Beretta Nano - redux
This is a discussion on Beretta Nano - redux within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Hi guys;
I wanted to let you know that the Beretta Nano video is finally released. You can find it here:
vid added to post ...
14Likes
-
September 12th, 2011 10:33 AM
#1
Member
Array
Beretta Nano - redux
Hi guys;
I wanted to let you know that the Beretta Nano video is finally released. You can find it here:
vid added to post by qks
Also: if you check out our Facebook page (Beretta Nano | Facebook), you can enter for a chance to win one 1-Year subscription to Guns&Ammo EVERY day for 60 days, plus a Nano at the end of the 60-day period.
Hope you enjoy!
Matteo Recanatini
Social Media Manager
Beretta USA Corp.
-
September 12th, 2011 10:33 AM
Remove Ads
-
September 12th, 2011 02:05 PM
#2
VIP Member
Array
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop putting internal locking systems on defensive hand guns. Please?
-It is a seriously scary thought that there are subsets of American society that think being intellectual is a BAD thing...
-
September 12th, 2011 02:06 PM
#3
Ex Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Rollo
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop putting internal locking systems on defensive hand guns. Please?
I know, this is ridiculous.
-
September 12th, 2011 02:39 PM
#4
Ex Member
Array
I'd like to know who these people are with loaded guns around the house that need to "deactivate" them. Lock them up you big dummies! 
That said, this gun looks very cool. I LOVE my PX4 Storm, so this is of great interest to me. I'll be checking one out when they are available.
-
September 12th, 2011 03:56 PM
#5
VIP Member
Array
So because it doesn't have a slide release lever that means I can pull back on the slide with either hand to release the slide?
Yeah I'm not crazy about the internal lock mechanism, there are some pretty inventive toddlers out there, I don't see this stopping them for long. I would likely never use the lock, but it is something else that could malfunction. What is the big whoop about not having to pull the trigger before diassembling the gun? If you fear the gun firing then you skipped the most important step in gun cleaning. Also what is the deal with having to use a tool to remove the slide?
Other than that it looks promising.
Thanks for posting!
NRA Life Member
With great power comes great responsibility.-Stan Lee
-
September 12th, 2011 04:08 PM
#6
VIP Member
Array
I think the nano looks sweet. I would love to see how the size stacks up to the market.
The Ruger MKIII 22/45 is the worst handgun in history to take apart, but is one of the funnest to shoot...
-
September 12th, 2011 04:33 PM
#7
VIP Member
Array
It being a 9mm I would consider it,but it depends on the price compared to other comparable guns
"Outside of the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the country,"
--Mayor Marion Barry, Washington , DC .
-
September 12th, 2011 04:39 PM
#8
Ex Member
Array
-
September 12th, 2011 05:27 PM
#9
Ex Member
Array
Hey mrecanatini, does the Nano have a magazine disconnect by the way? I can't seem to find a definitive answer on that, but maybe just looking in the wrong places. That one is a deal killer for a carry gun for me...
-
September 12th, 2011 05:30 PM
#10
VIP Member
Array
"Less than 20 oz loaded" - that is right on top of the PM9/CM9
User adjustable sights - nice
Slide locks open when empty, but no external slide lock lever - eh, not sure about that, I can see pros and cons either way
Price - competitive
Chassis system - seems like you will be able to change the gun into a larger version with a kit, similar to the Sig P250...nice, as long as the kit price is less than buying a whole new pistol
Size - IIRC, the PM9/CM9 is still a bit smaller. Not sure the Nano qualifies as a "pocket pistol"
Internal lock - bummer
Overall impression so far is...nice...but would have been better if it was a wee bit smaller in size. Don't think I'll be trading my PM9 for one, BUT maybe my wife will be interested in one - after they've been out for a year or so to work out any bugs.
NRA Life Member; Range Safety Officer
www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger LCP (2), LCR, Mini 14; Remington 870; Marlin 336 .30-30
CT Lasers
-
September 12th, 2011 06:46 PM
#11
VIP Member
Array
Even with some of the above-mentioned drawbacks, the nano is intriguing.
I wonder what kind of trigger it'll have.
Any educated guesses on this?
The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.
-
September 12th, 2011 07:47 PM
#12
Distinguished Member
Array
I'm amazed that some people here are allowed to handle firearms when they can't read.......... 
The NANO DOES NOT have an "internal lock" - it has a recessed decocking mechanism WHICH YOU ONLY USE WHEN YOU WANT TO FIELDSTRIP THE GUN. 
Personally I don't field strip my guns after every 50 rd box of ammo.
Also -lack of a manual slide lock doesn't compromise the function of the weapon.
-------
-SIG , it's What's for Dinner-
know your rights!
http://www.handgunlaw.us
"If I walk in the woods, I feel much more comfortable carrying a gun. What if you meet a bear in the woods that's going to attack you? You shoot it."
{Bernhard Goetz}
-
September 12th, 2011 08:21 PM
#13
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
AKsrule
I'm amazed that some people here are allowed to handle firearms when they can't read..........
The NANO DOES NOT have an "internal lock" - it has a recessed decocking mechanism WHICH YOU ONLY USE WHEN YOU WANT TO FIELDSTRIP THE GUN.
Personally I don't field strip my guns after every 50 rd box of ammo.
Also -lack of a manual slide lock doesn't compromise the function of the weapon.

Well, according to their own video, the push button safety thingy can be used to deactivate the striker, making the pistol "safe." Call it what you like, but it is, in fact, another thing that is both un-needed, and that can fail at the worst time. In the world of self defense equipment, simpler is usually better.
And the lack of a manual slide lock can, in fact, complicate recovery from certain more serious malfunctions. I understand why they didn't include one, but a low-profile version might have been better. JMHO.
NRA Life Member; Range Safety Officer
www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger LCP (2), LCR, Mini 14; Remington 870; Marlin 336 .30-30
CT Lasers
-
September 12th, 2011 08:23 PM
#14
VIP Member
Array
Not a fan since I have the PM9, but I'm sure there's a market for it. Adjustable sights on a small gun like this is not a huge selling point in my opinion, but having it can't hurt (unless they vibrate loose constantly). Also seems as though you need a tool for pretty basic functions, not a fan of that at all.
If the price is right it'll be a contender for the Ruger LC9 and the PF9 but I'm not itching to trade my PM9 for one any time soon.
Disclaimer:
My opinion shouldn't be taken seriously due to the fact that I've been shooting guns for over 30 years and have only recently been active on gun forums, where all the real world knowledge apparently is.
-
September 12th, 2011 08:51 PM
#15
Administrator
Array
Did you actually watch the video?
Probably not.
That feature is really intended to be used so that disassembly/ field stripping can be accomplished without having to pull the trigger al la GLOCK.
Its secondary function is that it can also be used as an optional safety.
Some times you folks type comments a bit too quickly.

Originally Posted by
Rollo
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop putting internal locking systems on defensive hand guns. Please?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search tags for this page
beretta nano
, beretta nano availability
, beretta nano holster
, beretta nano p
, beretta nano trigger pull
, beretta nano trigger reset
, beretta nano vs kahr pm9
, beretta nano vs kimber solo
, beretta nano vs lc9
, beretta nano vs lcp
, beretta nano vs pm9
, beretta nano vs sig p290
, kahr pm9 vs beretta nano
, kimber solo vs beretta nano
, sig p290 vs beretta nano