Kahr PM9 vs S&W 642

Kahr PM9 vs S&W 642

This is a discussion on Kahr PM9 vs S&W 642 within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Quick size up... Kahr PM9 comes in smaller in height, length and width (at the belly) and weighs in at 1 pound 3.8 ounces loaded. ...

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Kahr PM9 vs S&W 642

  1. #1
    VIP Member Array Civil_Response's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    2,558

    Kahr PM9 vs S&W 642

    Quick size up...

    Kahr PM9 comes in smaller in height, length and width (at the belly) and weighs in at 1 pound 3.8 ounces loaded.
    S&W 642 is thinner in the barrel, more rounded and weighs in at 1 pound .8 ounces loaded.

    Keep in mind, the PM9 also holds 2 more rounds with the 6 round magazine, which comes to .9 ounces with the ammo I use.

    I was really surprised at how little the weight difference came out to be since everyone raves about the J-Frame being a great pocket gun, but almost everyone says the PM9 is too big and heavy.

    Maybe it's the smoother curves and narrow barrel of the 642 that makes it different, me personally - I can't tell much difference, however initial thoughts are that the 642 seems to be a bit more comfortable IWB and in my Smartcarry.


  2. #2
    VIP Member Array tokerblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,355
    Definitely different strokes for different folks. I have the S&W 638 don't find it to be as comfortable as the PM9 IWB due to the cylinder.

  3. #3
    Distinguished Member Array Knightrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    1,327
    I've never found the cylinder to be a problem with my S/W
    Glock: G22 .40 S&W and G23 .40 S&W Sig Sauer: P938 9mm Smith and Wesson: Model 437 .38 Spl, Model 65 357 Mag, and Sigma SW9VE 9mm

  4. #4
    VIP Member
    Array gunthorp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    home office
    Posts
    2,355
    The 642 comes out of a front pocket better. The PM9/PM40 works in a back pocket better. If you have both, which one do you call BUG?
    Liberty, Property, or Death - Jonathan Gardner's powder horn inscription 1776

    Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito.
    ("Do not give in to evil but proceed ever more boldly against it.")
    -Virgil, Aeneid, vi, 95

  5. #5
    Senior Member Array wormy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,147
    I have a 637. Its great IWB. I couldnt pocket carry either. Nothing bigger than a LCP can go in my pocket. I think the cylinder on the 642 and the ammo capacity would give the nod to the PM9.
    Glock 22, 27 Gen 4
    Ruger SP101 .357mag
    S&W 637 Airweight
    Ruger Single Six
    Ruger Blackhawk Bisley 45 Colt
    Mossberg 835 Grand Slam

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

j frame vs kahr pm9
,
kahr pm9 vs 642
,
kahr pm9 vs j frame
,

kahr pm9 vs s&w 642

,
s&w 637 height
,
s&w 642 dimensions
,
s&w 642 height
,
s&w 642 vs kahr pm9
,

s&w 642 width

,
smith and wesson 642 vs kahr pm9
,
smith and wesson pm9
,
sw 637 height
Click on a term to search for related topics.