1911s Suck

This is a discussion on 1911s Suck within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by QKShooter Doodle "The other 1911 that was problematic was a wilson combat, that gun wouldn't feed a whole mag with out 1 ...

Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 78910111213 LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 193
Like Tree167Likes

Thread: 1911s Suck

  1. #151
    Ex Member Array Doodle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Tomball TX
    Posts
    948
    Quote Originally Posted by QKShooter View Post
    Doodle
    "The other 1911 that was problematic was a wilson combat, that gun wouldn't feed a whole mag with out 1 or 2 FTE's. I was soo pissed about that one after spending time with their guys on the phone and getting basically shruggs and I don't knows, I ditched it for an XD."

    Your comments about your experience with WILSON honestly have me perplexed because WILSON test fires every firearm before it leaves WILSON with a minimum of 80 rounds of three different ammo brands.
    Any of their firearms that malf (even once) during that test firing (after the completed "build") go back for corrective work. They really DO that - and that is before the firearm undergoes its final inspection. SO "one or two" malfunctions in every mag seems bizarre and highly unlikely.
    Did you purchase yours new from WILSON or did it have a previous owner?
    I have read (only a couple of posts on other forums) where a purchaser has had even a minor cosmetic problem with their WILSON purchase - like a tiny "ding" on the metal checkering and WILSON actually wanted that firearm back and they wanted to know who there at WLSON "signed off" on that gun with a final stamp of approval on that particular firearm.
    I purchased it new...mind you this is upwards of 6 or 7 years ago, but as I remember I was told on the phone, it just has to "wear in." I don't remember how many phone conversations took place and what else was said.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #152
    OD*
    OD* is offline
    Moderator
    Array OD*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Coopersville
    Posts
    10,712
    "1911 is designed for a arched main spring housing"..
    Mr Yeager is wrong, and Troll is correct (concerning the grip safety and flat mainspring housing), the M1911 was designed with the flat mainspring housing, and it retained the flat mainspring housing until the first M1911A1s were delivered on January 23rd, 1924. JD is correct when he stated the grip safety and lanyard were requested in the 1906 trials. Below is a Colt Model 1907 U.S. Military Trials .45 ACP , and the grip safety, flat mainspring housing, and lanyard loop can clearly be seen.

    (from the Sam Lisker collection)

    Serial #1

    Again, the flat mainspring housing grip safety and lanyard loop can clearly be seen.

    As to the myth JMB did not like grip safety's and only use it because he had to, his first commercially successful pistol using a grip safety, was his Model 1903


    (from the Sam Lisker collection)

    And for those that apparently missed it the first time;

    Last edited by OD*; February 23rd, 2012 at 05:58 PM. Reason: clarification & spellun'
    Olduser, MrBuckwheat, DRM and 5 others like this.
    "The pistol, learn it well, carry it always ..." ~ Jeff Cooper

    "Diligentia Vis Celeritas"

    "There is very little new, and the forgotten is constantly being rediscovered."
    ~ Tiger McKee

  4. #153
    Member Array GunLover69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    34
    I stopped watching when I saw the shirt he was wearing.

    :)
    DRM likes this.
    Everyday, amateur gun enthusiast. Active duty, Army.
    Read my gun blog!
    MyGunDiary.com

  5. #154
    VIP Member
    Array WHEC724's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    6,448

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by QKShooter View Post
    I really like his shirt because it looks like his wings are flapping when he raises his arms.

    ....
    I too was mesmerized by the chicken-wing-flappy-thing. It was the best part of his presentation.
    Guest1 and DRM like this.
    __________________________________
    'Clinging to my guns and religion

  6. #155
    Senior Member Array The Old Anglo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Orlando,Fl
    Posts
    659
    Idiots are everywhere!!!!!. Just ny take.

  7. #156
    Sponsor
    Array DRM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Near Historic Williamsburg, Virginia
    Posts
    638

    Thumbs up

    WOW!

    This thread went from what I thought was going to be a total train wreck to a very educational piece.

    Nice job, Gents, thank you!
    QKShooter and JD like this.
    "...with liberty and justice for all..."
    (Must be 18. Void where prohibited. Some restrictions may apply. Not available in all states). - D. Stanhope

    D.R. Middlebrooks - Pro Shooting Coach & Custom Gunsmith
    Tactical Shooting Academy & Custom Shop
    www.TacticalShooting.com

  8. #157
    Sponsor
    Array DRM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Near Historic Williamsburg, Virginia
    Posts
    638
    P.S. - The grip angle IS directly correlated to back strap of the pistol, not the front.

    And another point to note is there was no "thumb safety" on the original gun, so the grip safety was added (at the request of the U.S. Calvary) to make the gun safer. The grip safety was and is totally not needed, IF there is a thumb safety, IMO. So, I agree with Yeager on that point.

    It's a deathtrap and anyone who has done some true, FoF testing will agree. Further, I know a LOT of Top Shooters who have them disconnected for a good reason:

    BAD GRIP = FAILURE TO ENGAGE GRIP SAFETY = NO SHOTS BEING FIRED UNDER STRESS
    "...with liberty and justice for all..."
    (Must be 18. Void where prohibited. Some restrictions may apply. Not available in all states). - D. Stanhope

    D.R. Middlebrooks - Pro Shooting Coach & Custom Gunsmith
    Tactical Shooting Academy & Custom Shop
    www.TacticalShooting.com

  9. #158
    VIP Member Array gottabkiddin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    6,986
    Quote Originally Posted by wdbailey View Post
    This video just proves the awesomeness of the Glock
    Shooting that glock at that range was about the most reckless thing I have ever seen someone do... Just friggin dumb IMO..
    discoboxer likes this.
    "He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." Luke 22:36

    "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." Thomas Jefferson

  10. #159
    Moderator
    Array bmcgilvray's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,944
    Only personal experience but I've yet to have a problem with failing to engage the grip safety when shooting a 1911, whether carefully aimed on the range at a bulls-eye match or snatched to send lead toward a marauding feral dog in the back yard at night with the aid of a dodgy flashlight.

    I disagree that it's a deathtrap.
    No possible rapidity of fire can atone for habitual carelessness of aim with the first shot.

    Theodore Roosevelt, The Wilderness Hunter, 1893

  11. #160
    VIP Member
    Array OPFOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nomad
    Posts
    4,711
    bmc - all due respect (and I actually mean that), one instance of success under stress does not a fool proof method make. Again, tons of folks drive drunk every day and don't get into accidents. That doesn't mean that driving drunk is a good idea... Indeed, poor choices that have good outcomes often just reinforce the same poor choices.
    A man fires a rifle for many years, and he goes to war. And afterward he turns the rifle in at the armory, and he believes he's finished with the rifle. But no matter what else he might do with his hands - love a woman, build a house, change his son's diaper - his hands remember the rifle.

  12. #161
    Sponsor
    Array DRM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Near Historic Williamsburg, Virginia
    Posts
    638

    Lightbulb

    Only personal experience but I've yet to have a problem with failing to engage the grip safety when shooting a 1911, whether carefully aimed on the range at a bulls-eye match or snatched to send lead toward a marauding feral dog in the back yard at night with the aid of a dodgy flashlight.

    I disagree that it's a deathtrap.
    Well, I've got well over 1/4 million rounds downrange with 1911's between World Class competition and in Force on Force studies with resisting (punching, kicking, grappling) opponents. I actually got my leg broke once doing it, so, now I let Paul Sharp and the younger studs do it for me!

    But hey, opinions are like testicles: Everybody's got a couple, but they really only care about their own.
    OD* and C hawk Glock like this.
    "...with liberty and justice for all..."
    (Must be 18. Void where prohibited. Some restrictions may apply. Not available in all states). - D. Stanhope

    D.R. Middlebrooks - Pro Shooting Coach & Custom Gunsmith
    Tactical Shooting Academy & Custom Shop
    www.TacticalShooting.com

  13. #162
    Member Array seapuppy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Everett, Wa
    Posts
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by OPFOR View Post
    So....just so I'm clear.... Because the sights on your Taurus (and, um, well...it's a Taurus) are off, then the 1911 is better than the Glock. Just to make sure I'm following your logic. :)

    no ..not at all......the glock is a good weapon or I wouldn't carry it....but the 1911 is just as good imho.....taurus....well...it's ok....but I do love shooting the 1911 combat commander.....I wasn't comparing the glock......just the 1911....it's a great weapon and I feel this guy is off base....but...that's just me...



    Steve

  14. #163
    Senior Member Array JohnLeVick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Texas High Plains
    Posts
    568
    Interesting thread, but not interesting enough to get me to read it all. Here I am, having carried 1911-types for decades, having shot literally hundreds of thousands of rounds through them in practice, training and competition, having built 40 or so, having worked on about 100 others, never having pinned down a grip safety, and all this time, I've been using and working on a death trap!

    All seriousness aside, a properly adjusted grip safety need only move a tiny bit to disengage, unless the gun is not gripped at all or one's hand is literally deformed. If you want to shoot the gun without gripping it, well, I guess I can't help you. I've worked on several over the years that were incorrectly set up from the factory, and required being fully depressed to function. Wrong, but easy to fix. Usually takes me less than 10 minutes of judicious file work to get it "just right."

    Given that I sometimes carry a Hi-Power, I won't fault anyone who deactivates a grip safety. Some people have hands that are shaped such that it is difficult to FULLY depress a grip safety with a proper, high-thumb grip, but I've yet to see anyone with a hand sufficiently normal to shoot a pistol who didn't at least depress a properly adjusted 1911 GS enough to disengage it. I think that the idea that one that is properly set up is a liability is not correct, but since we should all have confidence in our carry guns (I do) if a functioning grip safety makes you nervous (not me), then pin that sucker.
    OD*, JD and bmcgilvray like this.

  15. #164
    Sponsor
    Array DRM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Near Historic Williamsburg, Virginia
    Posts
    638
    Right, the problem is more noticeable when using an "Ultra High" grip safety (like the STI or McCormick) and riding your thumb on the thumb safety. The size of your hands makes a difference here, too. To each his own, and you are right about fitment. It can help some folks, but not all, IMO.

    It's the ONLY thing I don't like about the 1911 (that and thin dust covers, no place for the off hand thumb to ride against)...
    "...with liberty and justice for all..."
    (Must be 18. Void where prohibited. Some restrictions may apply. Not available in all states). - D. Stanhope

    D.R. Middlebrooks - Pro Shooting Coach & Custom Gunsmith
    Tactical Shooting Academy & Custom Shop
    www.TacticalShooting.com

  16. #165
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,876
    Mmmm...popcorn.



    I did actually watch his video, and I think he actually made some great points. The 1911 is not designed for mass production. It was designed to be hand-fitted. In particular, his comments about "stacking" of tolerances is spot on. More modern guns are designed with ease of production in mind.

    The one gun that went down - hard - in the low light pistol class I attended last year? Yup. A 1911.

    And I think the comments he made about egos being tied to your choice in carry gun are spot on as well - as we have seen by the replies to this thread.

    Basically, he's saying your odds of a malfunction with a modern, mass-produced 1911 are higher than with a more modern design, which was designed for modern mass production techniques. I think I can agree with that. And his observations back that opinion up.

    Who wants some more? get it while it's hot...

    Tangle likes this.
    The more good folks carry guns, the fewer shots the crazies can get off.
    www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
    Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger SP101, LCR, LCP (2), Mini 14; Marlin 336 .30-30
    CT Lasers

Page 11 of 13 FirstFirst ... 78910111213 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

1911 suck
,

1911's suck

,

1911s suck

,
chris kyle carjacking
,
ria 1911 extreme tactical
,
rock island 1911 extreme tactical
,
rock island armory extreme tactical
,
rock island armory extreme tactical 1911
,
rock island armory gov't model 1911-a extreme tactical
,

rock island armory gov't model 1911-a extreme tactical 2011

,
rock island extreme tactical
,
why 1911s suck
Click on a term to search for related topics.