Thanks thunder. The lc9 just doesn't appeal to me.
This is a discussion on Cm9 or Shield? within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Thanks thunder. The lc9 just doesn't appeal to me....
Thanks thunder. The lc9 just doesn't appeal to me.
Just wanted to post that since there seems to be some confusion about the size of the Shield in relation to the LC9 and others.
Disclaimer:
My opinion shouldn't be taken seriously due to the fact that I've been shooting guns for over 30 years and have only recently been active on gun forums, where all the real world knowledge apparently is.
I sold my CM9 and got the Shield. It shoots like a laser and has the much much better trigger. The only reason I could say to keep the shield over the CM9 is pocket carry. While the CM9 is still not optimal for pocket carry the Shield is virtually not an option for pocket carry.
Thanks thunder an damon! If I were up moving around all day I'd probably carry a double stack but I'm stick in the driver's seat for a long time shield it is!
I totally agree about the shield trigger. That and the way it fit me like a glove are what really turned me onto it. I don't get why everyone loves the cm9 trigger...to each their own.
I would keep the CM9 if you like pocket carry. Otherwise I think the Shield is a better gun in almost every way- but the CM9 is still a good gun.
Hakkaa päälle!
Steering away from the CM vs. Shield debate for a minute, lets look at the bigger picture.
You have a CM9 now, which you are seemingly happy with except for the Igottahavethenewgunitis- By the time you buy the shield, get some holsters and magazines to go with it, you'll probably be pushing close to a 5-600 bucks out of pocket expense... and for what?
I'd keep what you got as long as it fills the role you intended it for.
"Just blame Sixto"
2*
M&P Doc- Just ask.
This is the post I was ultimately looking for, thinking about the benefits of keeping it and not blowing a pile of money. However I'll probably still go to the shield. I'm just more confident in it than I am the cm9. Trouble tearing it down and rough loading haven't inspired much confidence. I thought it was great at purchase time but not so much anymore.
And yes it's oiled, cleaned, well cared for, and out of its 250 round break in period.
dear Wreckingba11: even as the first responder to your post, i felt that you wanted the Shield. there's NOTHING wrong with that. i've been there, and i suspect that many others have, too. it seems that money is not a real issue, especially if you sell the Kahr, so get what you want. the Shield seems to be exactly what you want/need. if you don't trade, there will always be a nagging feeling in the back of your mind, and for what? all of us must compromise many times in our lives, but in this case, i see no need for you to do so. get the Shield and don't look back! best of luck. sensei2
shield is up to 400 rounds and running fine. it has coughed once with LRN that is a light target loads made for another gun.
para pointy ammo up to +p 124 cor-bon loads are grouping under 2" double taps. the lock time is quite fast;
suprisingly so for a striker fired gun. so the trigger is good--heck, its all good--especially the price.
percieved recoil is like shooting a cap gun. very pleasent, no fatigue
as i've noticed about others--that they do not always do as i think they will nor often as they say they will.
this not only makes life interesting, it makes it dangerous too.
For Sale 1985 Toyota Supra. one owner, 82K, will pass inspection, only needs some body/rust patching
Thanks sensei, you speak the truth. I have a few people looking to buy it and the shield should be mine soon!
Thanks for the range report Claude!
Looks good. I compared them both in the lgs, I'm pleased.