From article;
If the defender fires any shots, most likely it will be 2 rounds.
The shooting distance in the vast majority of cases was slightly in excess of arm's length.
At this distances,
even .22s and .25s are highly immediately lethal.
A revolver, even J-frame, is perfectly capable of dealing with almost all of the incidents.
The ones which were beyond the capabilities of a five shot revolver would be best deal with by a shotgun, anyway.
For those who do not practice, a revolver is far preferable to the autoloader because of the revolver's simpler manual of arms
^^^^^^^All we are doing here folks^^^^^^^^^^
is making a case for the anti-gun polititians to pass legislation which mimmicks Mexicos BS laws, which state all you can have is these many firearms, and in these calibers.
From Wikipedia:
Gun politics in Mexico - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ley Federal de Armas de Fuego y Explosivos (Federal Law of Firearms and Explosives)[3]
Generally, citizens are restricted by law to:
pistolas (handguns) of .380 Auto or .38 Special revolvers or smaller (.357 Magnum, .357 SIG, and 9x19mm Parabellum or larger are restricted)[4][5]
escopetas (shotguns) of 12 gauge or smaller, with barrels longer than 25 inches, and
rifles (rifles) bolt action and semi-auto.
Handguns in calibers bigger than those mentioned above are forbidden from private ownership without a federal license and restrictions similar to the U.S. National Firearms Act (NFA).
Examples of firearms that are legal for citizens to own include .380 ACP pistols, .38 Special revolvers, 12 gauge shotguns (no short-barreled shotguns are allowed) and rifles in any caliber with exceptions such as .30 Carbine, 7mm and 7.62 mm Carbines.
End quote;
I say, lets quit helping the very people who wish us left to defend ourselves with the resources that David had back in Biblical times.