LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksI know it's hard to say just yet, but would an XDS in 9mm necessarily be that much thinner than an XD in 9mm?
Thanks for any insight.
This is a discussion on XDS vs XD (Thickness)? within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I know it's hard to say just yet, but would an XDS in 9mm necessarily be that much thinner than an XD in 9mm? Thanks ...
Array
I know it's hard to say just yet, but would an XDS in 9mm necessarily be that much thinner than an XD in 9mm?
Thanks for any insight.
Freedom of speech does not excuse one from freedom of thought.
Array
It could be, but I would think they'd keep it the same so there's redundancy with the current XDs model. I also think that, by keeping the current dimensions, they could take advantage of it and increase magazine capacity, and directly start taking Shield customers from S&W.
Array
I would guess that the difference will be between .15 and .25 of an inch. Most single stack come in around .90 t0 1.15 Most double stack are between 1.17 and 1.25
-It is a seriously scary thought that there are subsets of American society that think being intellectual is a BAD thing...
Springfield lists the width at the slide stop at 1 inch. My understanding was that the frame size was going to stay the same for the other calibers.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
