This is a discussion on Caliber vs Capacity which do you prefer if 2 guns are similar in size ???>>>>>>> within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by crcr3399 I see the wisdom of your statement. I hereby change my belief to 8 smaller holes trumps 6 big holes. Is ...
My metal band: Born under Sirius
Glock 23, mic holster, clipdraw, abdominal carry.
A bunch of folks in this thread firmly (yet IMHO, mistakenly) believe that every shot they'll fire in a gunfight is gonna' be a center mass hit. Capacity is also effected by...misses
There are only TWO kinds of people in this world; those who describe the world as filled with two kinds of people...and those who don't.
I went middle of the road, PPQ in 40. 12+1 capacity, 165 or 180 grain. I shoot it very well after only a few days range time with (more to come) and I the recoil is hardly as bad as some people make it out to be.
Bear in mind you can always carry a second clip...
"Capacity" with MY "caliber" of choice....G19....15+1
Sometimes in life you have to stand your ground. It's a hard lesson to learn and even most adults don't get it, but in the end only I can be responsible for my life. If faced with any type of adversity, only I can overcome it. Waiting for someone else to take responsibility is a long fruitless wait.
Current 9mm jhp ammo closely approaches the effectiveness of .45acp. I find it easier to get more accurate hits, faster with 9mm.
So, after 30 yrs. of pistol shooting I'll choose the hi cap 9mm. :)
"Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, you should never wish to do less".
General Robert E. Lee
I'd go capacity. I own two 9mm find and they are cheaper to shoot at the range (I don't shoot reloads.), Better follow up shots due to reduced recoil, and obviously higher capacity. (Mainly easier for range time as I don't foresee myself ever getting into any extended gunfights.)
Caliber, if you need more than 10 shots (or even 6) to stop your attacker then you're either fending off a gang, or a terrible shot.
I'd rather a .357 magnum revolver.
NRA Certified Rifle/Pistol Instructor
Accuracy ALWAYS WINS! So carry what you can hit with.
If you find yourself in a fair fight your tactics stink.
.40 and good shot placement.
More bullets = better chance at good shot placement IMHO.
US Air Force, 1986 - 2007
"To disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them..." George Mason
I like to select by time of day and where I am going. Just going a couple of miles to wally-world I would travel light with my little 32 auto (its a good neighborhood). The north side of town during daylight my 9 with an extra clip. If I'm stupid enough to go to the north side at night, 45 backed up by a 40 backed up by the 32.
Smile. It makes people wonder what you are up to
Today's ammo performance in all calibers made for SD is pretty good all around, designed for that weight, speed, caliber etc. so I think I am going to have to say I'd probably go with capacity.
Vietnam Vets, WELCOME HOME
Crossman 760 BB/Pellet, Daisy Red Ryder, Crossman Wrist Rocket, 14 Steak Knives, 3 Fillet Knives, Rolling Pin-14", Various Hunting Knives, 2 Baseball Bats, 3 Big Dogs and a big American Flag flying in the yard. I have no firearms; Try the next house.
I used to think I could fend off the world with just my .45 and 7+1. Nowadays and after reading a lot of experts and talking to some too I believe capacity trumps caliber. That's why I went back to a double stack .40 (9mm just as good). I want double digit rounds, end of discussion.
The main reason is, in a really, really bad situation, I can't say that I'll be taking my time and aiming all that well. Seems to me the more rounds, the better. Suppressive fire is a wonderful thing.
As Benjamin Franklin left the hall in Philadelphia, he was asked, “What kind of government have you given us, Dr. Franklin?” He replied: “A republic, if you can keep it.”
In handguns of similar size, assuming all other factors meet my minimum requirements (reliability, power for the purpose, accuracy, concealability, cost), then I'd have to say: capacity.
ie, Similarly-sized lever-action rifle in .44mag (10rd) vs .30-30 (6rd) for bear or deer, I'd prefer the 10rd .44mag rifle every time, but for reasons of capacity. Same with a similarly-sized 9mm vs .40S&W vs .45ACP pistol, or a .357mag or .44mag revolver, in which I'd prefer the greater capacity.