Opinions on first carry gun- SIG v. Glock
Hey guys and gals, I've spent the last couple weeks searching through the forums and reading old threads. I've also read a lot of threads on other sites and I think I have narrowed down my choices for my first carry gun to:
Sig P250 sub compact .45
I really want to carry a .45 because I think they are more fun to shoot, but I don't want to get something too big that will violate the first rule. Ninety percent of the time I will be carrying this gun in a IWB holster, which is why I like the slim frame of the 36, even though it's a bit longer and taller than the 27. I've been to several gun shops and I like the way the 27 feels and I also like that I can change barrels and convert it to .357 SIG. However, the 27 isn't a .45...
Does anyone have any experience with a sig p250 sun compact .45? I haven't been able to put one in my hands yet but I located a store that has one I should be able to get to on Friday. I know a lot of people don't like the trigger, but I don't have a lot of experience with handguns so I don't think it will bother me much since I don't have a lot to compare it to.
My favorite things about the sig are the size and looks.
Is the glock 36 too big to carry IWB for long periods of time?
Out of the three guns I listed, which would you rather carry?
I did look at the Springfield's but I don't really like the safety on the grip and I don't like the S&W M&P because I can't get it in .45, and if I were to decide on a .40 it would be the glock 27 because of the internal safety mechanism and their reputation for durability in the conditions I will be carrying.
Any opinions would be greatly appreciated!