S&W 686+ 2.5" or 4" - Page 2

S&W 686+ 2.5" or 4"

This is a discussion on S&W 686+ 2.5" or 4" within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; The real answer is what do you want? There is not a tremendous amount of difference between the 2. How you are going to carry ...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: S&W 686+ 2.5" or 4"

  1. #16
    VIP Member Array Bad Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Where the deer and the antelope roam
    Posts
    3,646
    The real answer is what do you want? There is not a tremendous amount of difference between the 2. How you are going to carry it makes a difference. I have found that a 4" conceals just as well as a snubbie in a shoulder holster or belt with a suitable cover garment. A 686 weighs about the same as an N frame 44.
    My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon.

    “Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo.”
    - H. G. Wells -


  2. #17
    VIP Member Array matthew03's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    S.W. VA
    Posts
    2,060
    I owned a 2.5" 686+, if I had purchased the 4" I would probably still own a 686+. The short Bbl. isn't optimal for the .357. The fireball generated on an indoor range draws quite a bit of attention. That gun was a great way to get alone time on ranges as well, shoot a cylinder full of hot .357's and everyone would go home.

  3. #18
    Member Array Jambie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by stanislaskasava View Post
    I think the 4" 686 is perfectly designed and balanced. When you pick it up, it practically aims itself -- wherever you point, the sights are already lined up. I think everyone should own a 4" 686.
    What he said. I have the older six shot, 4" version, and can conceal it easily in my Simply Rugged pancake holster. Imho, the 4" .357, whether it be S&W, Colt, or Ruger, is the ultimate in versatility, from low-recoil SD loads in .38 spl to big game (including two-legged species) stoppers from Buffalo Bore. And don't forget, one popular load in .357 mag has, by far, the best one-shot stop statistics since they started charting them.

  4. #19
    VIP Member
    Array PEF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    4,083
    Quote Originally Posted by ksholder View Post
    For those of you who have the 7-hole, .357 686+, what barrel length do you have and between the 2.5" & 4" models, what are the pros and cons of each?

    I appreciate your input.
    I have the 686 in 2.5, 3 and 4".

    For me:

    2.5" Pros: Very well balanced. Feels like an extension of my hand. Easier to carry (but I carry j-frames or semi's, my 686's are my night stand guns).
    2.5" Cons: Shorter sight radius makes aimed shooting a bit less forgiving to user error. A little snappy with .357's but not bad.

    4" Pros: Longer sight radius provides great "point shootability." Tames the .357's somewhat. Much easier to shoot accurately at longer ranges.
    4" cons: Longer barrel can be a bit heavy and bulky. Not as handy as the 2.5".


    Some are concerned about "losing" the .357 effect with the shorter barrel. That doesn't concern me, and I have it loaded with .38+P anyway.

  5. #20
    Member Array Enzo411's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    408
    Quote Originally Posted by PEF View Post
    I have the 686 in 2.5, 3 and 4".

    For me:

    2.5" Pros: Very well balanced. Feels like an extension of my hand. Easier to carry (but I carry j-frames or semi's, my 686's are my night stand guns).
    2.5" Cons: Shorter sight radius makes aimed shooting a bit less forgiving to user error. A little snappy with .357's but not bad.

    4" Pros: Longer sight radius provides great "point shootability." Tames the .357's somewhat. Much easier to shoot accurately at longer ranges.
    4" cons: Longer barrel can be a bit heavy and bulky. Not as handy as the 2.5".


    Some are concerned about "losing" the .357 effect with the shorter barrel. That doesn't concern me, and I have it loaded with .38+P anyway.
    The obvious choice then isn't the 2 1/2 or 4 but the 3 inch.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

686 2.5

,

686 2.5 inch

,

686 2.5 vs 4

,

s&w 686 2.5

,

s&w 686 2.5 vs 4 inch

,

s&w 686 4 inch vs 2.5 inch

,
s&w 686 for home defense
,

s&w 686-4 2.5 inch

,

show your 686 snub 2.5 inch

,
smith 686 2.5 inch
,

smith 686 snub

,

smith and wesson model 19 2.5 verses 4 inch barrel

Click on a term to search for related topics.