stainless or blued

stainless or blued

This is a discussion on stainless or blued within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Not sure if this has been covered before, if so than my apologies. Which do you prefer, stainless or blued finish on your carry guns? ...

View Poll Results: Stainless or Blued

Voters
64. You may not vote on this poll
  • Stainless

    45 70.31%
  • Blued

    19 29.69%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35
  1. #1
    Member Array Matto4785's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Eastpointe, MI
    Posts
    21

    stainless or blued

    Not sure if this has been covered before, if so than my apologies.

    Which do you prefer, stainless or blued finish on your carry guns? Whats the advantages and disadvantages of both?

    The reason I ask is I am on the fence as to which I prefer. Blued is less flashy, and generally cheaper, but can rust if not properly cared for, and i really dont like the way a worn blued gun looks. Then with stainless, its less likely to rust and less prone for noticable wear, but is more flashy and noticable. I like the looks of both, I'm kinda leaning towards stainless, but I am car guy at heart, so nice and shiny is my way of thinking usually, but for a carry gun, I'm not so sure if I should a apply that thought.
    Though even as a car guy, function over looks rules all. All the looks in the world mean nothing if it cant back it up.


  2. #2
    VIP Member
    Array Ben Hennessy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    St. James, Missouri
    Posts
    2,406
    I perfer stainless. That is just me. It is easier to clean and take care of but like you already stated it is more noticeable. I just think a stainless weapon is nice looking and that is why I like to wear. I do not have good facts on the pro's and con's of either.

  3. #3
    Member Array GlockinItUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    260
    stainless

    Easy to clean, and won't be as affected by sweat. Also the added bonus that it looks really good. As far as visibility goes, I saw a quote on another forum that sums up my feelings on this matter: by the time the BG sees your gun, all he should see and hear is a flash and a bang, and should then be asking God where he made his mistake.
    Gun control is hitting what you aim at...

  4. #4
    Administrator
    Array QKShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Off Of The X
    Posts
    35,433

    Thumbs up

    All of my carry guns will be Stainless Steel from now on.

    Now that there are no longer any galling problems with Stainless I can see no reason why Blued carbon steel is any advantage at all.

    One huge advantage of Stainless steel is that if you are planning on doing any modifications to your firearm then you do not need to send it out to have it refinished. Stainless is Stainless all the way through & there is no surface finish on plain Stainless.

    Scratches are easily repaired at home and holster wear is not a problem.

    Satin or matte Stainless is no more reflective than any other firearm.

    I love Stainless Steel for firearms.

    Especially if you carry inside the pants or in a shoulder rig under the pit like I do...I love the no rust feature of Stainless.

    Some people have said that they have had Stainless steel rust on them but, I have never been able to get any of my Stainless firearms to show even a hint of rust. I have camped with Stainless guns that have stayed damp for days at a time and I don't worry about them at all any more.

    I think the greatest thing that has ever happened to firearms in decades...is Stainless steel.
    Liberty Over Tyranny Μολὼν λαβέ

  5. #5
    VIP Member Array artz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    2,351
    no doubt stainless steel. Its easier to keep clean.
    One of my carry pieces is blued for the fact its no longer made and I didn't have a choice. I'm just lucky the blue is a deep quality finish that is reputable in such a firearm. It gets a little more attention.

  6. #6
    Distinguished Member Array RSSZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,843
    Given just those two,I would definately pick SS.(I have.)

    But remember that you have alot more choices out there than that. Some are cheaper than SS. Some are far less prone to rust than SS also.

    Anodized aluminum. "Plastic". Also all the coatings,or embedding processes that are on the market nowadays.

    Would suggest that you take a look at 'em all before final decission. --------

  7. #7
    VIP Member Array pogo2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Southwest
    Posts
    3,149

    Third alternative - blackened stainless

    Several manufacturers offer semiautos with stainless slides finished in a black nitron finish. I have a Sig P229 in this configuration, and the slide matches well with the black anodized aluminum frame on the gun.
    Attached Images

  8. #8
    Senior Moderator
    Array pgrass101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    13,489
    I agree with POGO stainless with ablue finish, if not stainless anyway.

  9. #9
    VIP Member Array Rob72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    OK
    Posts
    3,468
    Stainless. If what you what isn't offered in SS, get it Teflon coated, at your soonest convenience.

  10. #10
    VIP Member Array sass20485's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Central FL
    Posts
    2,093

    SS or Blue ??

    I too prefer stainless for the reasons the others have mentioned.
    Given a choice, I always select the stainless modelon a carry gun. If you are worried about the gun being shiny and flashy, if a satin or matte finish is not available, it can be bead blasted. Had that done to several of my single action cowboy guns to lessen the glare on the sights.

    My blued guns are not normally carry pieces. Stainless is far more durable and easier to care for in a carry gun.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Array cmidkiff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Kansas City, Missouri
    Posts
    835
    Blue... just to be different :)

    Honestly, my main carry piece is a rather dull hard chrome, and my 'sometimes' carry guns are parkerized.

    I have 1 stainless handgun, I just got it, and if I had been able to find the same model in a nice deep blue for the same price, I'd have bought it. I also have 1 stainless rifle... same thing goes for it.

    Just personal preference... I like blue-and-wood guns and black-and-plastic guns better than stainless. Yeah, stainless is less likely to rust, but good maintenance takes care of that!
    Liberty is an inherently offensive lifestyle. Living in a free society guarantees that each one of us will see our most cherished principles and beliefs questioned and in some cases mocked. It's worth it.

  12. #12
    VIP Member
    Array nn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    7,120
    I have a stainless ruger single six that came with some rust. I knew the man that had owned it and knew he neglected his guns. So if you try hard it will rust, besides there are probably some non-stainless parts in it.

  13. #13
    VIP Member Array cphilip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    2,187
    I certainly like Stainless. But... this newer blueing technique on the new guns is a far cry better than it used to be. Its more of a Blacking and its harder and resists rusting and abrasion better than the olden days. It looks nice too. So I am not afriad of it if I can't find what I want in Stainless. My little 38spl is the new Black blued finish. Doesn't, so far, appear to be a high maintenace finish.

  14. #14
    Member Array snoozedoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    san antonio, TX
    Posts
    16
    To simply add to the other good points on the thread...Depending on what type of gun you carry I have noticed that many of the semi-autos that are availible in stainless tend to be stainless on both the slide and frame, which adds significant weight in the frame in comparison to either composite or alloy frames (usually between 8-12 oz extra for the stainless frames, depending on the pistol). Luckily, a lot of quality companies are offering lightweight composite/alloy frames with stainless slides; which give you many of the advantages of stainless for those concerned about holster wear, and the majority of the slide will be covered by most holsters or clothing (for the IWB carriers) if there is a concern for the less subtle color of stainless.

  15. #15
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    Aesthetically speaking I would choose blued but - practically speaking I am not going to carry a nice piece of Smith bluing and risk corrosion against this sweaty old body!

    Carry is SS ideally and my 226 ST reflects that, as did my SP-101. I will carry the 228 or 220 if need be but am very aware in summer of how often I will have to check for and protect against corrosion.
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Stainless vs. blued barrel
    By chains1240 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: January 13th, 2010, 02:29 PM
  2. Springfield Milspec Stainless vs Loaded Black Stainless
    By jwalker497 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: December 8th, 2009, 08:10 PM
  3. Snubbies blued? or SS?
    By ErikGr7 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: May 25th, 2009, 08:52 AM
  4. Blued Sights on Stainless Steel Ruger
    By jsmosby in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 21st, 2008, 02:52 PM
  5. Blued vs Stainless
    By wareagleky in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: May 11th, 2007, 12:35 AM

Search tags for this page

advantages and disadvantages of stainless firearms

,

anodized vs blued

,

black anodized verses nitron on 229

,

blued or stainless for carry

,
carry blued vs stainless
,

concealed carry blued or stainless

,

defense stainless or blued

,

stainless or blue gun for concealed carry

,

stainless or blued

,

stainless steel or blued finish

,

stainless steel versus black anodized gun

,
which is better blued or stainless
Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» DefensiveCarry Sponsors