I whole heartily agree with the statement that you do not want to choose a RIA or other lower tier gun for duty. The problem here is that there are 2 reason people buy these lower tier guns, 1 they want a 1911 but cant afford, or dont want to spend the money on a top level gun, or 2, they like the 1911 platform but only want a range gun. Of course there may be other reasons, and all of these are perfectly fine.
The problem is, when you attempt to convince yourself that what you have is up to the job of other top tier guns and emotionally defend your purchase against suggestion that its not up to ALL jobs.
But the truth is, a profession where the firearm is carried with not just the possibility, but the probability that it will be used at some point and time, and probably numerous times, is not the place for testing a cheaper product. When one is charged with the duty to run to the gunfire, instead of away from it, your sidearm needs a pedigree of proven performance built with the very best parts.
Now, to tell the truth, I have actually considered the purchase of a cheaper made gun like one from Turkey or the Philippines as a knock around gun for hiking or just hard abuse.
But, I couldnt bring myself to do it when I considered a couple of things. First, regardless of the use, I will still have to trust it to be up to the task. And 2, I can put a couple hundred dollars more with the 450 or 500 you would spend on s budget model and have a used Colt 1991, or a Springfield, which are made to a much higher standard with respect to steel hardness, and small parts constructed of solid steel.
These are my thoughts and observations. I have no emotional attachment to my Colts. If I did not think they were the absolute best value for the money spent, they would be gone, period.
I believe you will be very happy and greatful you chose a Colt and did not settle for a lesser product.