Review: M&P Shield vs. M&P 9c Photo Comparison

Review: M&P Shield vs. M&P 9c Photo Comparison

This is a discussion on Review: M&P Shield vs. M&P 9c Photo Comparison within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Special THANK YOU to DGM33 for letting us borrow his Shield for the photo shoot. Photographing the M&P Shield has really made me reconsider what ...

Results 1 to 13 of 13
Like Tree4Likes
  • 2 Post By Rem700
  • 2 Post By smolck

Thread: Review: M&P Shield vs. M&P 9c Photo Comparison

  1. #1
    New Member Array MandPNewscom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    6

    Review: M&P Shield vs. M&P 9c Photo Comparison

    Special THANK YOU to DGM33 for letting us borrow his Shield for the photo shoot.

    Photographing the M&P Shield has really made me reconsider what I carry daily, which has been the S&W M&P 9 compact. When I am not carrying the 9c, I carry the Sig Sauer P238 Equinox in my pocket. This author thought it would be fun to compare the three guns using photography. It is not often that I consider changing carry guns because it requires getting used to a new gun, which takes a lot of time, energy, training and money to use it effectively. I would equate it to test driving a new car, it just feels weird when you first get behind the wheel.

    The Shield is hot right now and for good reason. For the money, it is one of the smallest, most affordable sub-compact 9mm’s on the market. I see one in my future… Now for the porn.
    - Editor MandPNews














  2. #2
    Member Array wsquared's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    390
    That's some great work.

    The P238 is a thing of beauty in the Equinox finish...and that comparison is great for me...I have a shield, and I'm considering a 238.

    Which sights are on that Shield, and did you get a chance to test drive them?

  3. #3
    Member Array Broadus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    250
    Great photos. Thanks for sharing them.
    The chief end of man is to glorify God and to enjoy him forever (Westminster Shorter Catechism, 1647).

  4. #4
    Member Array Rem700's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    170
    IMHO neither is small enough for pocket carry atleast in my pockets, If I have to holster carry I will stay with my 9C with greater capacity + being able to use 17rounders for even more if I so choose.
    Philly Boy and MJB_17 like this.

  5. #5
    VIP Member Array smolck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    3,563
    The only place S&W missed on the Shield is the grip length. It should be as short as the 9c. They could have made an extended mag like the 9c has. I don't understand why they did that. The grip is what makes it too big for pocket carry. Even with the 7 round mag, it is too long. No, if I am going to have carry it in a holster anyways, I'll take the extra rounds of the 9c/40c over the Shield.
    Pistology and Philly Boy like this.
    As Benjamin Franklin left the hall in Philadelphia, he was asked, “What kind of government have you given us, Dr. Franklin?” He replied: “A republic, if you can keep it.”

  6. #6
    VIP Member
    Array 1MoreGoodGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    6,770
    Nice infomercial.
    Regards,
    1MoreGoodGuy
    NRA Life Member
    GOA Life Member


    Behave Like Someone Who is Determined to be FREE!

  7. #7
    VIP Member Array sixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    indiana usa
    Posts
    2,563
    Quote Originally Posted by Rem700 View Post
    IMHO neither is small enough for pocket carry atleast in my pockets, If I have to holster carry I will stay with my 9C with greater capacity + being able to use 17rounders for even more if I so choose.
    +1 here to. I was going to get a shield until I compared them. Ill take the extra rounds of the compact. If I want to carry something smaller Ill carry my thunder 380. But for the most part Ill carry the 9c. Thanks for sharing the photos it gives a good comparison of the two guns.

  8. #8
    New Member Array MandPNewscom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    6

    M&P Shield night sights

    Quote Originally Posted by wsquared View Post
    That's some great work.

    The P238 is a thing of beauty in the Equinox finish...and that comparison is great for me...I have a shield, and I'm considering a 238.

    Which sights are on that Shield, and did you get a chance to test drive them?
    It is wearing a set of Trijicon night sights. I have not shot the Shield yet. I am waiting for the new CORE and will test them all together for a better comparison.

  9. #9
    cj
    cj is offline
    Senior Member Array cj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,008
    For me, a big difference is that I can fit the Shield in my pocket...I had intended it as a nice, slim OWB, but discovered that it fits just fine in the pants I tend to wear every day.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Array Cokeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,013
    Cargo pants?
    Glock 23 - CZ 452 ZKM Special - Walther P22
    LMT STD 16 - Mossberg 500A - Kahr P380
    Henry H001Y - Winchester 12
    Smith & Wesson M&P Shield - Mossberg 500B
    Marlin 336Y - Kahr MK9

  11. #11
    Ex Member Array MJB_17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    1,418
    Quote Originally Posted by Rem700 View Post
    IMHO neither is small enough for pocket carry atleast in my pockets, If I have to holster carry I will stay with my 9C with greater capacity + being able to use 17rounders for even more if I so choose.
    I agree, I have no interest in pocket carry and this is largely why I cancelled my Shield order and got a 9c. Although the 9c is larger in most dimensions and is 5oz heavier, it is still very light for the capacity. I carry mine with the flat base 12 round mag and keep a 17 round with an X Grip in my center console. Also, shooting with the full size mag and X Grip on the range is a lot of fun, very little recoil even for 9mm.

  12. #12
    cj
    cj is offline
    Senior Member Array cj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Cokeman View Post
    Cargo pants?
    5.11 Covert Khakis (original version). I picked up a bunch in all colors when everyone was clearing them out, and they have good size pockets with integrated magazine holders...and they look like typical khakis. I'm also 6'3" and 175ish pounds, so my size may play into it, but they DO fit, while the compact doesn't.

  13. #13
    Member Array sevtchevlle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Overland Park Kansas
    Posts
    31
    Don't care for the shield, held one put it back. I prefer the thicker grip on my MP9C and have no problems trying to conceal it either. Plus it holds more rounds and if I want a 17rd mag slips in just nicely...Eric

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

m&p 9c review

,
m&p 9c reviews 2013
,
m&p 9c versus m&p shield
,
m&p 9c vs m&p shield
,

m&p 9c vs shield

,
m&p core review
,
m&p shield vs m&p 9c
,

m&p shield vs m&p9c

,
m&p9c vs shield
,
shield vs 9c
,

shield vs m&p9c

,
shield vs mp9c
Click on a term to search for related topics.