XDS v. Various J-frames (with pictures)

This is a discussion on XDS v. Various J-frames (with pictures) within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; This is my disinterested comparison of the XDS v. J-frames. It's not meant to start a debate on which gun is "better." If you are ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: XDS v. Various J-frames (with pictures)

  1. #1
    VIP Member
    Array PEF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,691

    XDS v. Various J-frames (with pictures)

    This is my disinterested comparison of the XDS v. J-frames. It's not meant to start a debate on which gun is "better." If you are on the fence about getting a small carry, and are looking at these two offerings, you may find this helpful.

    A friend has an XDS and lets met take it to the range when she can't make it. The more I use this gun the more impressed with it I become. I don't know if I am ready to purchase one for myself, because I prefer revolvers, but I must say a disinterested comparison gives more than the edge to the XDS is both firepower (5 rounds .45 v. 5 rounds .38/.357) and footprint.

    Regarding firepower, I won't debate the efficacy of the .45 v. .38/357.

    As for handling, I must say the XDS, while snappy, handles very well, and I would say it's much like a +P in an airweight j-frame.

    As for concealment, here are some comparisons.

    In the first picture a SW 640-1 (.357) is overlaid on an XDS with an extend 7 shot magazine. The grips on the 640 are Ahrend's boot grips. Had I used the original combat grips, the back strap would be covered by about 1/8" of rubber, and a pinky grip would extend about 1/2" below the grip. So you have a five shot .38/357 v. a 7 shot .45. Because of the cylinder in the J-frame, the XDS, with its flat cross section, is thinner.



    Advantage in concealment and firepower: XDS

    This next image is one of a SW 60-3 overlaid on the XDS without the extended magazine. The 60-3 is a .38 only, and the barrel is about 1/4" shorter than the 640-1 in .357. The 60-3 frame is about the same as an airweight, so this is also an accurate comparison of an airweight (442, 637, 642, etc.) to an XDS. This is the "minimum" footprint for a J-frame. Assuming you are going to the small size in both platforms, the XDS still prevails - it's thinner and has five rounds of .45 v. 5 rounds of .38



    Advantage again goes to the XDS.

    This last image is one of a SW 60-7 (.38) with a pinky grip. The grip, while longer, allows for the pinky to provide some grip support. Now you will see that the overall "concealment" foot print is about the same size as that of the XDS. However, the XDS is outfitted with the 7 shot magazine. And if you top off, you now have 8 rounds of .45 v. 5 rounds of .38.



    Advantage again goes to the XDS.

    About the only advantage of the revolver is its inherent reliability - I've never had a revolver jam, and if you have a failure to fire, you pull the trigger again.

    There's something about revolvers that I do enjoy. However, the more I think about a carry choice, the more I am wondering why I am not moving to the XDS for my main discreet carry option. I suppose its my own personal bias and my attachment to the revolver. Maybe one day soon I will switch. Not sure if I am ready to yet, however.
    Bad Bob likes this.
    -PEF, a Framer with a Steelie...
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    1. All guns are always loaded.
    2. Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.
    3. Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.
    4. Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member Array Easy8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    N FT Myers, FL
    Posts
    2,763
    Great pics, I know what you mean have shield, glocks but I cc snubs just to easy to shoot well, comfortable, an always work.image.jpg

  4. #3
    VIP Member Array Adam42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    2,402
    Thanks for the photo comparisons, I am a huge fan of revolvers, I am not a fan of small autos. I carry full size autos every day, do carry a small revolver some, fewer parts and things to go wrong.

  5. #4
    Member Array 9mmjoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by Easy8 View Post
    Great pics, I know what you mean have shield, glocks but I cc snubs just to easy to shoot well, comfortable, an always work.image.jpg
    god easy8 the pictures of your revolvers never seem to blow me away and make me think to myself " wow! those are some or the most beautiful damn things ive ever seen!!"

  6. #5
    Distinguished Member
    Array Old_Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,241
    Regardless of size, my J-frame carries better in my pocket than my XDs does. That round shape is more natural than one with all 90 degree angles. Thanks for the photos.
    QKShooter likes this.
    The worst thing about growing old is that other men no longer see you as dangerous.

  7. #6
    Member Array Drgnfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    444
    Thanks for the review and insight.

  8. #7
    VIP Member Array Easy8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    N FT Myers, FL
    Posts
    2,763
    They are pretty, but they actually perform really well, the SP is scary accurate out to 25 30 feet which is about the max I practice to. They cc so comfortable you dont even know your wearing them.

  9. #8
    Member Array Yetiman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    SE Wi
    Posts
    290
    Which one is more likely to go bang every single time, time after time (shot after shot)... Advantage J frame.

    And I am a big 1911 guy.

    I considered an XDs when they first came out, but availability of the gun and the cash never coincided. I was given a S&W Airwieght a while back from a neighbor and I have come to love it. My small light carry gun was an LC9 which I have an excellent holster for (more important to a carry choice than the gun IMO), and I find I carry the J more than the LC9 now that I have some good IWB leather for it.
    NRA Life Member


  10. #9
    VIP Member Array xXxplosive's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,702
    Reliability......? What else is there.....?

  11. #10
    Member Array lnferno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    91
    At the beginning of the year, I actually put down a deposit on an LCR .357. Then I made the mistake of handling the XDs at my LGS. I was this || close to buying the LCR, but I ended up changing the deposit for the XDs. I'm glad I did. I've put 840 rounds through my XDs and haven't had a single issue. It is SO easy to CC.
    NRA Member
    "Remember the first rule of gunfighting ... have a gun."

  12. #11
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,970
    A light weight snubbie is going to be considerably lighter than the XDs. Weight matters, not just size.
    The more good folks carry guns, the fewer shots the crazies can get off.
    www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
    Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger SP101, LCR, LCP (2), Mini 14; Marlin 336 .30-30; Mossberg 500
    CT Lasers

  13. #12
    Senior Member Array kahrcarrier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    IN
    Posts
    613
    Nice comparison! Thanks!

  14. #13
    Member Array pattrickg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Pa.
    Posts
    29

    Tried that

    I tried that with a Kahr PM9 I had purchased. Looked good! Tried to discretely place it in my pants pocket and it felt much larger? My 642 will meld nicely despite the cylinder,it just does. The PM9 despite being thinner prints like crazy. Has the same look and feel as carrying a VHS tape in my pocket? Trying to clear my pockets quickly... forget about it between the angles and all the revolver beats it badly. I like the Kahr but for quick and easy I just tend to grab the revolver. Kind of like a pocket knife just easy and convenient.

  15. #14
    Member Array GetSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    342
    Thanks for the great comparison. Very timely for me as i've been looking for a bug/deep concealment gun. The J frame is the winner for pocket carry hands down. Im not big on pocket carry and dont mind toteing the extra wieght to gain the extra firepower. I can see the XDS 45 backing up my 5 and 4 in 1911's soon.

  16. #15
    CSG
    CSG is offline
    Member Array CSG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Out West
    Posts
    63
    I'd prefer a .45 ACP cartridge but when I pocket carry something a little bigger than my LCP, I like my 442. Like pattrickg, I've also got a PM9 but that's an IWB carry for me too unless I'm wearing some roomy cargo pants.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

best j frame 357 for ccw
,
j frame or xds
,

j frame vs xds

,
j-frame vs xd-s
,
jframe vs xds
,
lcr 357 vs xds 45
,
lcr vs j frame
,
springfield xds vs j frame
,

xds 45 vs j frame

,
xds 45 vs s&w 640
,

xds vs j frame

,
xds vs jframe
Click on a term to search for related topics.