This is a discussion on Ruger LC-9 or S&W 642 as a Pocket Gun/BUG? within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Which one would you pick of JUST THESE two choices?...
Which one would you pick of JUST THESE two choices?
As a "Pocket Gun/ Backup Gun (Bug), to a Primary carry, I would have to go with the narrower profile of the LC9.
For a self defense carry, I have heard much negative on the LC9 and much positive on the 642. I would certainly prefer a 9mm over a .38 Spcl, personally, but I do not have personal experience with either of these specific models.
I would like to test the LC9 for myself and I do love my J-frames on occasion with +P ammo, but I never carry a BUG anymore (I'll take my chances with one sidearm).
Retired Deputy- State Trooper (38 long years) 8 yrs RTO - MS Degree- Criminology
Gun Control measures are Unconstitutional Infringements. Period.
"...He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one"- Luke 22:36
My LC9 has performed flawlessly and ate at least 6 brands of ammo with zero issues. Everyone complains about the trigger and other safety features and all of them I find as a bonus as well. The trigger is really sweet when you get accustomed to pulling it back. I would think it big and heave for pocket carry. I also have the LCP which I am also very very fond of.
I'm a 642 guy, and highly recommend it.
I don't have an LC9.
IMHO, the lc9 is too big for a pocket gun, so I said 642. However, if your pockets are big enough that you can conceal and draw an lc9, it might be the better choice.
"...there is no arguing with such snivelling puppies, who allow superiors to kick them about deck at pleasure."
– Captain Bellamy
J frame all the way everyday.
S&W 642. The LC9 has terrible trigger. Very crude feeling IMO. I own 2 DAO handguns (Sig P250C in 9mm & Kahr PM9) with triggers that put the LC9's DAO trigger to shame. Like night & day. I have 2 buddies who owned LC9's & BOTH sold them off in short order. I tried one buddies LC9 out & shot the worst I ever have in my life with it. I also experienced several FTF during the same range session.
Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk
EDC pocket carry a 442. I don't have an lcp, but do have a shield 9. Speed of deployment is MUCH faster with the snubby.
They think they don't need firearms because they never have needed them.
"God created man, but Samuel Colt made them equal (more or less)."
Practice makes perfect.
j frame no lock all the way.
I dont want a gun with a internal lock..
Trigger can be fixed and nights sights can be added . If they made a no lock lc9 I get it and fix it up but lock no sales .
Honeslty I like slim 380/9 single stacks but khar and lc9 are the only ones I wont buy till I have plenty of time and money to make sure I will have no issues.
If my only choice was lock model 642 and lc9 I would get the lc9 cause the lock seem to go more on s&w then rugers . But in case I would buy neither if I had the choice
No contest here; 642
"Just blame Sixto"
I reserve the right to make fun, point and laugh etc.
I have a Kahr PM9 I purchased thinking it would be adequate for pocket carry. Problem is with the grip angles and all it was like trying to stick a VHS tape in my pocket. To my surprise it printed much more than a J- frame. Drawing the weapon was also problematic with the angles. The flat grip also made grasping quickly difficult. The J-frame was much simpler in all respects. Despite trying to make it work I now pocket carry either a 642 or an LCP if going that route. I would advise you to ask the shop owner if after taking everything out of your pocket if you could try just slipping it in for comparison sake. There is a reason why so many carry a snubby in a pocket. It just works.
For pocket carry I far prefer the rounded edges of a revo. A pocket carry environment is full of lint, dust and crud; therefore the revolver's more debris resistant mechanism is favored. A hammer less wheel gun has the added benefit of being able to fire through the pocket in dire emergency.