This is a discussion on Accu-tek within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Just wondering has anyone had any experience with the At-380?...
June 4th, 2007 10:14 AM
Just wondering has anyone had any experience with the At-380?
June 4th, 2007 11:12 AM
I looked at one a few weeks ago. In short I wasn't impressed. Lot's of sharp edges and felt like a brick (all stainless)The website says 23.5 ounces but I find that hard to believe. Throw in the Euro mag release and I'm gone.They are new I think so quality might improve. Reminded me of an AMT ...only worse. The price was 249.99...the same as the Bersa Thunders they had. The Bersa is the better way to go. If your set on that "look" check out a PPK or a Sig 230 or 232.
Sorry if this sounds rough but it's the impression I got of the quality.
"When you reload in low light encounters, don't put your flashlight in
your back pocket.. If you light yourself up, you'll look like an angel
or the tooth fairy...and you're gonna be one of 'em pretty soon."
June 4th, 2007 05:56 PM
Now I need to try a Bersa and kel-tec to see which one I like for carry.
June 4th, 2007 06:35 PM
I was never impressed with the gun. I've never fired one, though.
People seem to love the Bersa, but if I could, I'd probably get a Kel-Tec. The P-32 or P-3AT.
"Use human means as though divine ones didn't exist, and divine means as though there were no human ones." Baltasar Gracian
Integrated Close Combat
Glock 19 & 26, Kahr CM9 & P45, Para P12, Kel-Tec P-32, S&W 442, & Dan Wesson 14-2.
By Sportsterguy in forum Member Buy, Sell & Trade
Last Post: January 24th, 2009, 06:32 PM
Search tags for this page
accu tec 380
accu- tec 32
is the accu- tec 32
kel tec customizing accutek
wtb accu-tek at-380
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors