I love my Glock, but...
This is a discussion on I love my Glock, but... within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I don't carry it, because it doesn't have a manual safety.
I know most here disagree with the desire for a manual safety, but that ...
-
July 26th, 2007 10:27 AM
#1
Member
Array
I love my Glock, but...
I don't carry it, because it doesn't have a manual safety.
I know most here disagree with the desire for a manual safety, but that discussion is for a different thread.
I found a company that will install a manual safety on my Glock for about $150.00
Does anyone have any experience with an after market manual safety, or this company.
The Glock would become my new favorite carry piece if this solution is as good as it sounds.
http://www.tarnhelm.com/GlockSafety.html
-
July 26th, 2007 10:27 AM
Remove Ads
-
July 26th, 2007 10:51 AM
#2
VIP Member
Array
I believe its the Cominolli safety, and if so, you might have a local smith that could save you $100(all the shipping).
I wouldn't recommend it- its adding a complex mechanism (read: addind probability of failure) to a KISS system, but I can understand how you feel.
-
July 26th, 2007 11:04 AM
#3
VIP Member
Array
Alternative course of action
If you spend $150 to install an aftermarket manual safety on your Glock, it will probably make the Glock harder for you to sell in the future, as most buyers will not want that feature.
There are quite a few handguns on the market with a factory installed manual safety as part of their design. Examples would include most Berettas, H&K USPs, 3rd generation S&W autos, 1911s, etc. If I were you I would buy one of these for carry, and either sell the Glock or keep it for range use, where the lack of a manual safety will not be a problem.
-
July 26th, 2007 11:09 AM
#4
Member
Array
There IS a manual safety on the glock, just not in the traditional sense. Do yourself a favor, don't mess up a great weapon by adding a needless (complicated install) item. If you're really worried, get a saf-t-blok and save yourself some loot!
Never criticize a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes...that way, when you criticize him, you're a mile away and you have his shoes.
-
July 26th, 2007 11:12 AM
#5
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Rob72
I believe its the Cominolli safety.
Sure looks like it.
Persuading my gunsmith to do it, would be like pulling teeth.
When I asked him if there was an add-on manual safety, I got a 15 minute lecture on the intrinsic safety built in.
-
July 26th, 2007 11:22 AM
#6
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
pogo2
If you spend $150 to install an aftermarket manual safety on your Glock, it will probably make the Glock harder for you to sell in the future, as most buyers will not want that feature.
There are quite a few handguns on the market with a factory installed manual safety as part of their design. Examples would include most Berettas, H&K USPs, 3rd generation S&W autos, 1911s, etc. If I were you I would buy one of these for carry, and either sell the Glock or keep it for range use, where the lack of a manual safety will not be a problem.
My daily carry is a S&W CS45 or a PPK/s, both of which have a slide mounted safety, that operate similarly. They are both great guns, and I like them...but the Glock is like custom made for my hand.
Shooting it, feels like I’m a conducting a symphony orchestra.
-
July 26th, 2007 11:27 AM
#7
VIP Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Geo2020
(bet he wouldn't carry his 1911 cocked and unlocked though

)
Nor would I, because the 1911 doesn't have the INTERNAL safeties of the Glock, not to mention the 1911's lighter trigger pull, and the fact that the Glock is NOT cocked until the trigger is pulled... If you're uncomfortable with the lack of external safeties on the Glock, then that's certainly your right - but comparing a Glock to a "condition zero" 1911 is false logic.
A man fires a rifle for many years, and he goes to war. And afterward he turns the rifle in at the armory, and he believes he's finished with the rifle. But no matter what else he might do with his hands - love a woman, build a house, change his son's diaper - his hands remember the rifle.

-
July 26th, 2007 11:39 AM
#8
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
OPFOR
Nor would I, because the 1911 doesn't have the INTERNAL safeties of the Glock, not to mention the 1911's lighter trigger pull, and the fact that the Glock is NOT cocked until the trigger is pulled... If you're uncomfortable with the lack of external safeties on the Glock, then that's certainly your right - but comparing a Glock to a "condition zero" 1911 is false logic.
I edited the comment out
-
July 26th, 2007 01:26 PM
#9
Member
Array

Originally Posted by
Geo2020
I don't carry it, because it doesn't have a manual safety.
I know most here disagree with the desire for a manual safety, but that discussion is for a different thread.
I found a company that will install a manual safety on my Glock for about $150.00
Does anyone have any experience with an after market manual safety, or this company.
The Glock would become my new favorite carry piece if this solution is as good as it sounds.
http://www.tarnhelm.com/GlockSafety.html
What holster do you carry your Glock in? I ask because I feel plenty safe with mine in a holster that covers the trigger. When I draw my finger is out of the trigger guard until I'm ready to fire.
Dave
"When among wild beasts, if they menace you, be a wild beast."
-Herman Melville
-
July 26th, 2007 01:47 PM
#10
VIP Member
Array
Just curious.............
What about a revolver, would you not carry one of those? (most DON'T have a safety either.)
Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.-Seneca
"If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. If I have a gun, what do I have to be paranoid about?" -Clint Smith
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -Jeff Cooper
-
July 26th, 2007 02:30 PM
#11
Moderator
Array
Your Glock is as 'safe' as anyother weapon. I have two EDC's, a Kimber Ultra, and a Glock-36.
Remember, the real safety is your finger...if you drop the Glock, it isn't going to fire, but if you drop a 1911 that is not C & L...well, that could be a problem.
It's a 'finger' thing...nothing more or less...
OMO
"That I cannot do."
"Give this to, uh, Clemenza. I want reliable people, people who aren't going to be carried away. After all we're not murderers in spite of what this undertaker thinks."
***********************************
Certified Glock Armorer
NRA Life Member
-
July 26th, 2007 03:01 PM
#12
VIP Member
Array
Glock is probably one of the safest handguns made as is! As one poster already put it you have to pull the trigger to set the striker. Its almost next to impossible to make one go off without pulling the trigger. 1911's expecially with some of the mods done to them these days to be "Competition" guns. I would feel a little less secure.
"Before" you do the safety modefication due a little more research on the internals of a GLOCK. Heres the Best video I could find short notice http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...+pistols&hl=en
You do not fight like you train nor will you rise to the occasion, but rather default to the highest level you have mastered....Officer B. Harnish.
I am not responsible for any mispelngs or gramcraker mistakes caused by auto correct!
Its not about guns..........Its about Freedom!
-
July 26th, 2007 03:08 PM
#13
-
July 26th, 2007 05:01 PM
#14
Member
Array
I sold my Glock for that very reason.
I think guys are blowing smoke when they talk about the safetys on Glocks. I don't care if it has 150 safetys. If you pull the trigger, it shoots, as some people have found out the hard way, including at least one LEO whose shirttail pulled the trigger. That won't happen with a 1911 which has a traditional safety and a grip safety.
I got a Springfield XD with the same type safety as the Glock PLUS a grip safety to replace the Glock. In my mind it is a heck of a lot safer.
Having said that my CC is a Kahr without even the trigger safety. I just don't carry one in the pipe. A lot of people says that makes me too slow, but what the hey, at age 71, I doubt I will win any speed draw contests anyway. (Old age and treachery will defeat youth and skill....... I hope!)
-
July 26th, 2007 05:16 PM
#15
Member
Array
here is a better way for a safety instead of messing up the frame of your glock you can switch the triger out later if oyu want to sell it.http://siderlock.com/
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Similar Threads
-
By skysoldier29 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Replies: 5
Last Post: January 1st, 2011, 08:23 PM
-
By jwhite75 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Replies: 20
Last Post: September 9th, 2010, 09:35 PM
-
By cammo in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Replies: 61
Last Post: September 4th, 2010, 08:41 PM
-
By csburbank in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Replies: 6
Last Post: August 2nd, 2010, 10:04 PM
-
By ExactlyMyPoint in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Replies: 61
Last Post: July 18th, 2008, 04:00 PM
Search tags for this page
glock love
, i love my glock
, i love my glock 27
, i love my glock but
, is there a safety i can add to a glock 27
, israelis love the glock
, l love my glock
, my glock fires when i release the triger
, siderlock vs cominolli