P3-AT vs 642

This is a discussion on P3-AT vs 642 within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; 642...

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: P3-AT vs 642

  1. #31
    Senior Member Array f8lranger4x4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    virginia
    Posts
    896
    642

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #32
    Member Array jbart57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    kcmo
    Posts
    29
    Easy peasy, lemon squeesy. 642.

  4. #33
    VIP Member Array NY27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,382
    I have a P3AT and a couple of j frames. For a primary I would go with the 642. I only carry my P3AT as a BUG sometimes.

    As mentioned there is not a good resale value on the KTs. I would just buy a 642 and keep the P3AT.

    Good luck.
    Police Defensive Tactics, Firearms, Carbine Rifle and Taser Instructor
    Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member
    It is better to have your gun and not need it, than to need it and not have it!
    You cannot choose the conditions for a gunfight, so train in all conditions!

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

380 vs j frame stoppping
,
642 versus p3at
,
642 vs p3at
,
j frame vs p3at
,
kel tec p3at vs s&w 642
,

muzzle velocity p3at

,
p3at grip panels
,
p3at vs 642
,

p3at vs 642 sw

,
p3at vs j frame
,
replace grip p3-at
Click on a term to search for related topics.