Beretta 92fs or Sig 226
This is a discussion on Beretta 92fs or Sig 226 within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Looking for my newest ccw and home defense pistol. Currently carry a 1911 or Glock 26. I know both firearms are big but that is ...
January 22nd, 2008 11:39 PM
Beretta 92fs or Sig 226
Looking for my newest ccw and home defense pistol. Currently carry a 1911 or Glock 26. I know both firearms are big but that is what I want. Just cant decide, keep going back and forth. I think Berettas are beautful and Sigs have the reputation. just looking to try something different. I cant rent these guns. I have an extensive firearms background. These two firearms have eluded me and am looking to broaden my horizon.Which would YOU purchase.
January 22nd, 2008 11:51 PM
Both good guns; but I'd select the Beretta 92FS.
Back when I was issued the P228 9mm, I purchased the equivalent Beretta 92F Compact (92FC). I preferred the 92FC due to it having manual safety, it fit my hand better, I shot it better, and the action and trigger felt smoother in my hands.
I am currently issued the P229 which it, like the SIG P226 and P228, is a great gun; I even prefer my Beretta 96F Centurion over the P229....and I like my Beretta 92 FC Type M over my SIG P6 which are both eight-shot/plus one 9mm's single stack guns.
What can I say....I like my Berettas!
USAF: Loving Our Obscene Amenities Since 1947
January 23rd, 2008 12:00 AM
I'm the opposite.
I had a Berretta and traded it off. It wasn't a bad gun, it was just clunky and ugly.
Sometime there after, I got started with the Sig.
My first one was a 220 which I use for my duty gun when I play Deputy, then the second one was a .40 239. Then a 9mm 226. Then a 9mm 225, and soon thereafter a 226 in .357 Sig. After that a .380 230 that I'll probably never carry.
So if I were recommending one it would be the Sig, but in all honesty I think the Beretta is a great gun too. Either one will do you well.
hecks...the next step towards registration and confiscation.
AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...http://bobbailey1959.wordpress.com/
January 23rd, 2008 12:02 AM
"The pistol, learn it well, carry it always ..." ~ Jeff Cooper "Terrorists: They hated you yesterday, they hate you today, and they will hate you tomorrow.
End the cycle of hatred, don’t give them a tomorrow."
January 23rd, 2008 12:03 AM
I had a 92 and traded it for a sig and I'm glad I did.
January 23rd, 2008 12:07 AM
I'd go with the Sig, but there is nothing wrong with a Beretta.
"Just blame Sixto"
I reserve the right to make fun, point and laugh etc.
January 23rd, 2008 12:15 AM
Tough decision, I have a 226, but I would not turn down a 92 either.
January 23rd, 2008 01:26 AM
Just my opinion but I'll take the 226!
January 23rd, 2008 01:50 AM
I've owned both and carried both on duty. I found the 226 to be more comfortable in my hand and a better natural pointer. Accuracy is also very good. They are much easier to conceal as well. I'd go with the 226----------
January 23rd, 2008 07:26 AM
Both of these are quality guns, equally so I would say. So there is no "better" gun over the other. Some will prefer Sig and some Beretta, nobody can decide this for you. It must be your decision, and only you can make the right one. I love my Italian made 92F it is definetly not what I would call a "clunker", good luck and if both guns feel equally in your hand, flip a coin, and in the end buy both of them!!
When Seconds Count, The Cops Are Just Minutes Away!!
January 23rd, 2008 08:28 AM
I have both, and to be honest, as much as I respect Sig's "To hell and back reliability" if the 92FS weren't so long (barrel), it'd be my pick. But it's length does cause me some concealment issues. Of course the right holster helps, but it's still a long gun - longer than a 5" 1911.
Having said that, yesterday I ordered a Sig 220 Carry - what can I say?
I'm too young to be this old!
Getting old isn't good for you!
January 23rd, 2008 08:29 AM
I've shot both, and just bought a 226.
Originally Posted by tdc rangemaster
Very accurate, very reliable right out of the box.
The 92 is nice but for the the Sig was "just right".
(n) - a list of things that aren't going to happen if you are attacked.Blame it on Sixto
- now that
is a viable plan.
Learning to shoot again : Starting Over
January 23rd, 2008 08:51 AM
My brother-in-law bought the Sig and I bought the Beretta. We shoot together at the range and swap out guns on occasion. I can honestly say, these two guns are in a league of their own. They are as equal as two handguns can be. One is not better than the other. The Beretta was a better fit for my hand and the Sig was a better fit for bil's hand. I liked the looks of the Beretta over the Sig and bil liked the looks of the Sig over the Beretta. I believe this decision is strictly up to you.
Welcome to Tennessee, the patron state of shootin' stuff.--SHOOTER
January 23rd, 2008 09:12 AM
Both are great guns. I don't own a Beretta 92 but it's on my list to buy. I do own a Sig 226. In the matter of choosing which to ccw, I'd go with the sig.
January 23rd, 2008 09:38 AM
Sig for me, but Berettas are nice.
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on."
- Sir Winston Churchill
By Striker543 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: September 23rd, 2010, 01:59 PM
By shipwreck in forum Member Buy, Sell & Trade
Last Post: January 25th, 2009, 03:27 PM
By SubNine in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: June 21st, 2008, 07:53 PM
By NFEDERIC in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: April 30th, 2006, 11:17 PM
By WJP9 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: April 7th, 2006, 03:39 PM
Search tags for this page
accuracy sig vs beretta 92fs
beretta 92fs ccw
beretta 92fs for home defense
beretta 92fs home defense
beretta 92fs home defense gun
beretta 92fs vs sig p229
ccw a sig p226
is the beretta 92fs a good home defense gun
sig 226 for home defense
sig p226 or beretta 92fs
sig x5 for defense
Click on a term to search for related topics.