Glock 26 or S&W 642 - Page 2

Glock 26 or S&W 642

This is a discussion on Glock 26 or S&W 642 within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I just saw that you're in Alaska..I hope you don't plan on shooting polar bears w/ that little gun...... it would just make him angry....

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 35
Like Tree10Likes

Thread: Glock 26 or S&W 642

  1. #16
    Member Array TonyB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Schodack NY
    Posts
    284
    I just saw that you're in Alaska..I hope you don't plan on shooting polar bears w/ that little gun...... it would just make him angry.
    "Just because I'm paranoid,doesn't mean they're NOT after me...."


  2. #17
    Distinguished Member Array SubNine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Anchorage Alaska
    Posts
    1,972
    Polar bears aren't a big issue in Southcentral Alaska, it's the black and brown bears I have to worry about. I do have a 12 gauge Remington 870 for such a purpose, if I ever choose to go hiking.
    USMC rule # 23 of gunfighting: Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.

    I am the God fearing, gun toting, flag waving conservative you were warned about!

  3. #18
    Distinguished Member Array snowdoctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    MICHIGAN
    Posts
    1,275
    The most carried firearm in the ccw community is the j-frame revolver or a clone of it...
    You will never be disappointed with one...many people carry other things...but sooner or later...you end up with a j-frame.
    simple, 100 percent reliable, and built to last forever.
    you might have guessed my vote is for the j-frame.
    wheelyfun101 likes this.
    ----DOC-----

    --people ask why I carry, and I show them this picture. I think it says it all.--

    NRA Certified Instructor--many disciplines

  4. #19
    Member Array stmcelroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    250
    For pocket or ankle, the 642 is the correct answer.

    If you're going to be going IWB or OWB, the Glock 26 would be the best choice.

    The Glock 26 will shoot great out and beyond 25 yards, where the snubby is really an up close and personal type gun, IMHO.

    Both are great guns, and I own both(my 642 is actually a 340PD), but I find myself carrying the snubby the majority of the time. I find that I can carry my Glock 19 just as easy as the 26, and have more rounds and a longer grip to hold onto.
    wheelyfun101 likes this.
    www.RKBAconcealment.com

    Check it out for quality reasonably priced leather and kydex Pocket, IWB and OWB Holsters......

  5. #20
    Member Array jayoh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    32
    I carry the 26, and it was my first handgun. Im not that great or experienced a shooter, but I can perform surgery with it at 25 yards. I also carry a 340 pd with the titanium cylinder. Its less accurate at that range, although it got better when I had the trigger test lowered. It comes at 12 lbs, I got it down to 9, and I can hit really well at ten or fifteen, but 25 yards Im no good with it.
    The 26 of course has more round capacity, and is more accesorisable (sp?).

  6. #21
    Member
    Array GBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Central California
    Posts
    468
    Try the 642, it has a smaller grip, I had trouble with it 'numbing' my hand after firing only a few shots. Accurate as the Glock though.
    Your experience may be different...

  7. #22
    Senior Member Array wht06rado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    785
    Quote Originally Posted by mynameisFred View Post
    For ankle carry or pocket carry - S&W 642.

    For the 10-15 yard accuracy the Glock 26 easily.
    I agree. The 642 makes a good pocket gun. I have one in my pocket right now and I can't even feel it's there. However, if you're looking for something that will be a lot easier to shoot at 15 yards go with the Glock. I think both are good choices in a firearm. It just comes down to what you want to use it for. Best of luck in your decision!

    Edited to add: I also wanted to add that I have pretty large hands and my 642 chews my hand all up when I shoot it much. Which may be something for you to consider.
    “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security” Benjamin Franklin
    I'm not pro gun, I'm pro rights. What are you?

    NRA
    Member
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  8. #23
    Member Array Doug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    51
    The only area in which the 642 beats the G26, is weight. Otherwise, the G26 is superior in every meaningful way. Get a 642, load it with the FBI load, and take it out to the range along with a G26, and compare the two. The Glock is more durable, every bit as reliable (maybe moreso, as it doesn't have a lock), doubles to triples the firepower, is much easier to shoot accurately, and has much less felt recoil. I've owned two 642, and a 340 M&P, and they're great in a pocket, but ultimately, I know that if I ever had to use a small CCW firearm in a defensive situation, I'd much prefer the G26. Didn't someone once say, "comforting, not comfortable"?
    wheelyfun101 likes this.
    \"What you\'ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling incoherent response where you even close to expressing anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. May God have mercy on your soul.\" My adoring wife, at least once a day.

  9. #24
    Member Array Stkglover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    32
    Dont forget with the Centennial series you can grip the firearm higher on the backstrap since theres no hammer or slide blocking the way this helps absorb the recoil and makes follow up shots quicker.
    wheelyfun101 likes this.
    "The world is filled with violence. Because criminals carry guns, we decent law-abiding citizens should also have guns. Otherwise they will win and the decent people will lose."
    James Earl Jones

  10. #25
    Senior Member Array wheelyfun101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    vermont
    Posts
    604
    Sounds like the OP is going with the j-frame, which is a solid choice.
    As others have stated, the j-frame vs G26 is really apples to oranges...

    The easiest gun I have ever carried is a j-frame. I consider the j-frame a last-ditch, get-off-me gun.
    The G26 is super easy to conceal on the belt (IWB) and I consider that a more capable in a "gunfight" weapon.

    Both winners!
    OP, lets see some pics and review....once you get up and running!

  11. #26
    Moderator
    Array bmcgilvray's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    10,474
    OOOooo... I hope the OP got up and running by now. He originally posted almost 6 years ago.
    Charter Member of the DC .41 LC Society "Get heeled! No really"

    “No possible rapidity of fire can atone for habitual carelessness of aim with the first shot.”

    Theodore Roosevelt, The Wilderness Hunter, 1893

  12. #27
    Distinguished Member Array 5lima30ret's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Mountains of Western North Carolina
    Posts
    1,411
    Both are great handguns but have somewhat different purposes as some of the others said! Personally I like the 442 oover the 642 but I would add the LCR to list especially if you are going with the ankle carry. BTW, years ago I tried ankle carrying the G-26. That did not last long! It felt like a brick strapped to my ankle! Good luck!
    Last edited by 5lima30ret; November 21st, 2013 at 03:33 PM.
    Retired Police Lieutenant, Retired USAF Reserve, Glock Armorer, NC CWP, HR-218 Qualified
    Second generation American, Third generation Legionnaire
    "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me" Phil 4:13

  13. #28
    VIP Member Array searcher 45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    4,208
    Even tho THIS thread is 6 years old, there are SO SO SO many new folks on this sight that are reading and hunting info for their own needs that I am grateful that these threads are left active.
    NOT LIVING IN FEAR, JUST READY!!!
    I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness,
    nor the arrow for its swiftness,
    nor the warrior for his glory.
    I love only that which they defend.
    -J.R.R. Tolkien

  14. #29
    Distinguished Member Array noway2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,947
    The thread may be old, but the question is still valid.

    My answer is that I have both. I have a G26 and a S&W 638. I carry them both separately under different circumstances and together with the j-frame as a bug.

  15. #30
    Member Array Vlad883's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Ky
    Posts
    131
    I lucked out and found a new 642 without the lock. I also have the G26. I love them both.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: December 16th, 2010, 08:51 AM
  2. Glock ftf2 Compacts vs Glock rtf2 Fullsize i
    By dee in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: November 17th, 2010, 07:12 PM
  3. WTS Brommeland Gunleather Holster Combo for Glock 26 or Glock 27
    By WJP9 in forum Member Buy, Sell & Trade
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: October 8th, 2009, 11:21 PM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: March 1st, 2009, 10:37 PM

Search tags for this page

642 vs g26
,
g26 vs 642
,
glock 26 ils
,
glock 26 or s&w 642
,
glock 26 vs s&w 642
,
glock 26 vs snub
,
glock 26 vs snub nose
,
glock 26 vs snubbie
,

glock 26 vs. snub nose revolver

,
s&w 642 vs glock 26
,
snub nose vs glock
,
snub nose vs glock 26
Click on a term to search for related topics.