Which one???

This is a discussion on Which one??? within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by rhinokrk PF-9 Lighter and thinner . Be sure to break in, keep properly lubed, and practice as much as possible. Both have ...

View Poll Results: Which one would get?

Voters
139. You may not vote on this poll
  • Kel-Tec PF-9, 9MM Single Stack mag. 7+1, Blued $333.00

    63 45.32%
  • Kahr PM9093N, 9MM 7+1, $890.00

    76 54.68%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 44

Thread: Which one???

  1. #16
    Senior Member Array FlyboyLDB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    864
    Quote Originally Posted by rhinokrk View Post
    PF-9
    Lighter and thinner.
    Be sure to break in, keep properly lubed, and practice as much as possible.

    Both have their problems 'out of box', KT probably more, but with the weight difference (read; harder to shoot, again practice as much as possible) that's not a surprise.

    Good luck on whatever you choose.
    KT has pretty much taken care of the issues with the PF9 with their current release. I have had zero issues with mine. It was for size and cost that I did not entertain a Kahr. The PF9 is a great carry gun. Not a fun range gun. By the time you get a box through it, you will be ready for a break. Accuracy for me was around 4-5 inch grouping at roughly 25 yards. Closer distances was better. It conceals so well, I have it with me 90% of the time. It does pocket carry ok - but you need loose fitting pants. As with any gun, it has it's pro's and cons.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #17
    Ex Member Array BikerRN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    State of Discombobulation
    Posts
    5,253
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnyrigger View Post
    Biker, how can you clam bullets and range fees on your Taxes?

    Read my profile.

  4. #18
    VIP Member
    Array TX-JB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    5,738
    Have you considered the Kahr CW9? Mine was $399 NIB, and is only slightly larger than the PM9. It has been very reliable, even during break-in. I looked at the Kel-Tec, it just didn't fit me as well as the Kahr.
    "Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas!".... Sam Houston

    Retired LEO
    Firearms Instructor
    NRA Life Member

  5. #19
    Senior Member Array wht06rado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    786
    PF-9. I think Kel-Tec makes good guns for the $$.
    “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security” Benjamin Franklin
    I'm not pro gun, I'm pro rights. What are you?

    NRA
    Member
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  6. #20
    Distinguished Member Array Gideon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,764
    As others have said, you're price is way too high on the PM9. I'd definitely go with the Kahr over Keltec if I could afford the "real" price difference. I believe they're much better made and I know the Kahr trigger is far superior to that of the Keltec. Size difference is negligable. So to me, it's only the price.

    If I were to give another small nod to the PF9 it would be the grip size. You get a fuller grip withthe PF9 compared to the PM9. How important this is depends on how you're going to carry. If in pocket the PM9 is better, if holster, then it doesn't matter.

  7. #21
    Member Array Hoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    133
    OldTXCop has nailed it. The Kahr CW9 (or .40) is the way to go. Locally they go for $389. You get thin and light with a great grip shape, smooth trigger, and outstanding reliability. What's not to like?

  8. #22
    Senior Member Array the_fallguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Southern Missouri
    Posts
    544
    If money is not an issue, by the Kahr. If it is a big consideration, buy the PF-9 and carry it while you save up the money for the Kahr. When you get the Kahr you can sell the Kel-Tec.
    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
    Where self preservation is concerned, if you're not cheating, your not trying...

  9. #23
    Member Array skippythenurse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Houston, TEXAS!!
    Posts
    353
    I chose Kel-Tec mainly because it is cost effective. Both are pretty reliable.

  10. #24
    Distinguished Member Array Wasabi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Lutz, FL
    Posts
    1,227
    I'd go with the Kahr and in fact did. BTW, I paid $650 OTD for mine brand new w/DLC treatment and night sights. Right now it resides in a DeSantis Nemesis pocket holster ($14) until my K&D 2-in-1 pocket holster ($55) arrives. It feeds on Federal HST 147g but I'm looking to pick up some Winchester Ranger RA9T 147g to try out. I'm happy with my choices.

  11. #25
    Member Array Rbrown777's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    228
    Well, well, well..

    Honestly, I am not trying to start a caliber war.

    I must say though...I believe 9mm to be insufficient except for perhaps deep cover or "backup" status. Especially when you can also have an infinitely more efficient and effective caliber in the S&W .40.

    The Kahr PM40 is an awesome choice. There are also many many other .40 or .45 ACP choices available to you. Remember, you are defending your LIFE.

    For now, I'd have to pass on both your proposed pistols.

    Just my humble opinion.
    "If it is possible, as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men." Romans 12:18
    ...if not...be prepared to meet Mr.10mm, .45, .40 or any one of their little brothers.

  12. #26
    Distinguished Member Array Ghettokracker71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Under a rock.
    Posts
    1,763
    Lets see,...Every Keltec Ive ever seen goes "bang" everytime you pull the trigger (reliable.) Its easily concealable, has readily available holsters in many different styles,shapes,colors,options,and brand preferences. They have an outstanding warrenty,very accurate (for me at least),fits MY hand well,and its less expensive.

    And Ive heard plenty and seen plenty of threads dealing with folks having problems with Kahrs. Higher priced weapon,does not neccesarily mean a better weapon.


    "To blame a gun for a mans decision is to foolishly attribute free will to an inanimate object"- Colion Noir.

  13. #27
    Member Array Nosce Te Ipsum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    113
    Johnny,

    I looked LONG and HARD at the Kahrs for my CCW. I waited for close to a year for the range to get their 3 models back (9, 40, 45) from the manufacturer - the range was claiming the mfr was having a parts issue. When I finally saw all three back in, I tried each caliber out. The single stack mag and thinness and reported reliability had me sold. I came away thoroughly disappointed.

    I had FTE (after firing), stovepiping and chambering problems across all 3 calibers (some models had multiple issues). These events were were the final straw that pushed me to Glock (only cause SIG is more expensive). I want a weapon that has a high reliability with a minimum of fuss, and the Glock meets that.

    So, to answer your question, Kel Tec.

    Steve

  14. #28
    Member Array forestranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    318
    PF9. Got 2. Neither been back to factory. Never shot a PM9. They probably fine too. Just rather have 2 PF9s plus all the ammo u can buy for same $ as 1 pm9.

  15. #29
    Member Array Footslogger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    435
    The trigger on the Kahr puts the Kel-Tec to shame... I owned a P11 for several years, and now I own a Kahr MK9. My MK9 won't be going anywhere any time soon.

    There is an obvious difference in the quality between the two if you have owned both, trust me. However, if you need to save money then the KT will work.

    Oh and like SixTo said, that price is way high for a PM9. Around here I would find one around the $600 range.
    Dave

    "When among wild beasts, if they menace you, be a wild beast."
    -Herman Melville

  16. #30
    Member Array forestranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    318
    PF9s go for around $245 NIB around here and trigger much better than P11.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

khar pm9093n

Click on a term to search for related topics.