I personally dont like the look of this gun although it may be a practical CCW. As far as Taurus goes i would not be afraid to own one. I used to have a PT24/7 Pro in .40 & it shot & felt great. I only got rid of it because i could not get anything for it & iam an accessory nut :hand5:
It looks like a more ergonomically gripped version of the Kel-Tec PF-9. Probably more comfortable to shoot without the hard angles in the upper backstrap area...
The little Tauras is the same weight (19oz) as the Khar CW9 and I would guess it is very close in other dimensions. Moreover, the price is about the same. Locally the CW9 is $389. That should not be much less than the street price for the Taurus. It should be an interesting face-off between the two guns. The questions will be which gun has the greater dependability, the better trigger, the better ergonomics, and the least perceived recoil?
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Defensive Carry
5.4M posts
117.5K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to defensive firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about everyday carry, optics, holsters, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!