November 9th, 2005 01:54 PM
Kahr P45 Range Report (Long & With Photos)
As some of you know, I purchased a Kahr P45 last week. I managed to fire it yesterday in the presence of PW (administrator of the Beretta Forum ), who fired off 16 magazines worth of .45 ACP ammo through the gun.
My earlier post regarding purchasing the P45 is here (including a couple of photos): Uh Oh (Again)..now this time my P7 is in trouble.....
To give range report some perspective, the weapon mimics the overall design and basic ergonomics of the rest of the Kahr line as you can see in this photo:
Note, my weapons in the photos, from top to bottom, are the P45, P9 Covert (9mm) and PM9 (9mm). To accommodate the larger .45 ACP, the gun is of course larger overall.
The P45 is a double action only (DAO) semi automatic pistol utilizing, as seen in the photos, a stainless slide and polymer frame. The frame has very aggressive checkering fore and aft. The P45's external extractor is big and blocky. The sights are tightly dovetailed into place. The front sight has a white dot and the rear sight a vertical white line. The magazine well is lightly beveled. The magazine carries six rounds of .45 ACP ammunition.
One thing here...I don't really like the plastic baseplate on the magazine. They add some bulk to the magazine. This a concealment weapon and a 1/2 inch or so of added concealment is...well, 1/2 inch of (possibly) added unnecessary bulk. That said, I did a little experimenting. I took the metal baseplate and tab that locks the baseplate into place from a range-only Star PD .45 ACP magazine. The baseplate fits perfectly, but the tab does not...it's too long. The tab for the P45 magazine won't fit the Star PD magazine baseplate. If I can only file it down.....one day I suppose.
As my earlier post stated, I noted that the magazines require a very good hard smack to lock them into place. PW noted something I hadn't up to then....a major difference between my polymer framed 9mm Kahrs and the P45 is that the magazine release button is apparently made entirely of metal. Those of my 9mm Kahrs are (externally) polymer. That said, I had only had to strike the bottom the magazine with the strength of Superman only twice. I believe a round was already in the chamber both times. Loading the gun from an empty chamber did not require a hard slap.
God bless Kahr for giving us a grip that is (for my smaller hands) perfect. I have no problems reaching the DAO trigger. A person with really large hands might have a problem, but perhaps not, the grip is truly bigger than its smaller (albeit older) siblings.
This Kahr's barrel mimics it's 9mm siblings: the feedramp is offset which, according to Kahr, assists in keeping things compact. The ramp is very lightly polished. The recoil assembly is a simple affair: a metal rod and spring. Although I don't know what the spring weight is…getting the rod/spring to seat properly. takes a bit of doing since it's heavy (maybe 20+ pounds?)
I didn't notice things gunwriters take note about like tool marks.
Prior to taking the gun to the range, I performed my usual basic stripping of the weapon and cleaning of the barrel and slide/frame interiors and lubricating of the rails and barrel hood. Field stripping is as with other Kahrs: mate the two lines (one on bottom left of the slide and a second on the top left of the frame), push the slide stop lever out from the right and pull the slide off the frame. Reassembly is reversed. Militec was the lubricant used as with all of my guns.
I noted that getting the slide and frame to lock back into place was a bear. Something (I believe the recoil spring rod) was catching somewhere. I never could figure out where. It took about five minutes of "fitzing" with the gun to get the two halves to mate and lock into place.
Range day saw me taking 200 rounds of Winchester White Box (WWB) 230 grain FMJ, 100 rounds of Remington 230 grain JHP (all from Wal Mart) and a handful of CCI Blazer Brass 230 grain FMJ ammunition. PW had, I believe, WWB ammunition as well.
Anyhow on range day, I set up a couple of targets and set it for seven yards, inserted the magazine and fired off six rounds carefully. All six went into a very tidy group. Daddy be likin' the P45! Lots! For a gun with a short sight plane and long DAO trigger pull (more on that in a second) this gun is accurate! However two negatives were quickly noted:
1. Ejection: the ejection on this gun is very (VERY) erratic. Within a magazine of six rounds, one round might bean me on the head, one might bean PW five feet on my right, one might hit my right earmuff, one might go straight up, one might go ten feet behind me and the last empty cartridge case just a few inches from me. This issue happened throughout the range session.
2. Trigger pull: in a word....it's L---O---N---G....no, really, it's really long. Oh, by the way, did I say it was long...no? Well, it was. I put in this perspective to PW after firing the first 12 rounds...the only other gun I own that is as long (actually a bit longer) is the trigger pull for my Kel Tec P3AT .380 ACP....when I pulled the trigger it would take about a week for the gun to discharge due to the long trigger of the P3AT....that said, it would take about three or four days for the P45 trigger to discharge after I initiated pulling the trigger.
That said, no one can ever accuse a legally armed citizen or LEO of accidentally discharging this gun, but it will definitely take training to get used to it's long arc. PW and I both found ourselves throwing at least one round out of six out of a group if our concentration drifted a bit.
Good thing about the trigger pull....it's nice and smooth and not heavy at all. It's weight stacks a bit (but it's not that heavy even then) at the point the shot breaks which is good...your trigger finger will have feedback when pulling the trigger.
The bottom line about the trigger is that despite it's length of pull, it's manageable. It is a street gun trigger meaning, it's meant for self-defense and not competition.
Ok...on to other observations.
PW stated that the "pineapple" checkering in the polymer was a bit sharp....he's right, but I liked it. The gun was well anchored when it discharged.....and with this light gun, you need it. This gun does recoil a bit which is to be expected given it's chambering. Recoil was well managed in this gun though. Taking into account the aforementioned trigger pull, firing controlled pairs were not difficult with this gun. I attribute that to the aggressive checkering, polymer frame and low bore axis of the gun.
The outside of the slide and slide stop lever can use dehorning....especially the lever....there are some sharp areas.
The sights were nice and blocky.....but this gun begs to get tritium night sights installed.
The magazines would fall freely from the gun after hitting the magazine release button. The feedlips of the magazines are bit sharp so maybe check that if you buy a P45...you may need to lightly file the lips to knock the sharp edges.
Well, in firing the gun (almost 400 rounds) I do have to report that there were two failure-to-feed (FTF) malfunctions using the WWB ammunition within the first 200 rounds which is not uncommon with Kahr 9mm's. In both instances (within two magazines of one another), the slide stripped the rounds from the magazine into the chamber, but the rounds did not fully chamber. At that point, the gun was filthy. I think the rounds might have been slightly oversized. That, and a dirty chamber, might have contributed to those two FTFs. Kahr recommends a break in period of 200 rounds with their product line. I'm not too worried about the two FTFs; my PM9 has suffered some malfunctions within its first 250 rounds. It has not suffered one since and its current round count is about 1000 rounds.
Leather for the Kahr 9mm's does not the P45. Maybe Glock or HK USP leather will? The magazines will fit in a carrier for a 1911 but not for a single stack 9mm.
How to improve this very nice gun…..for starters, Kahr needs to give us magazines with a flat metal baseplate (actually its not a huge deal but it would be nice as that would aid in concealment), dehorn the slide and slide stop lever (necessary), check into the ejection pattern of the gun (maybe this issue is isolated to my gun) and reduce the long trigger pull by about a foot (kidding....just a little) but not the pull weight. Oh, they also need to look into the magazine loading issue (loading the magazine into the well). Although I only had the problem a couple of times in actual testing.
Wrapping up this LONG report (only a wee bit longer than the trigger pull), this is a good gun....one that will now be part of my off-duty carry battery (when leather is available for it) which currently consists of the Kahr 9mm's in the photo above.
Here is a parting photo. Note the soot on the muzzle. Range was seven yards and that time all six went into that group:
I hope this range report is remotely helpful to someone.
Last edited by srfl; November 9th, 2005 at 02:42 PM.
USAF: Loving Our Obscene Amenities Since 1947
November 9th, 2005 02:17 PM
Excellent write-up and thx.
I am not a Kahr owner/user but it is invaluable to have feedback on any guns - it really does help. IIRC the only Kahr I did try left me wishing for addition of Hogue Handalls because grip was too small.
Few smaller semi's are totally free of small annoyances but reliability does seem pretty good. Great info
Chris - P95
NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.
"To own a gun and assume that you are armed
is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."
- a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.
November 9th, 2005 02:18 PM
Great report, srfl!! Glad to see the she performed to your liking.
"I noted that getting the slide and frame to lock back into place was a bear. Something (I believe the recoil spring rod) was catching somewhere. I never could figure out where. It took about five minutes of "fitzing" with the gun to get the two halves to mate and lock into place."
I experienced this too and discovered what the hang up was. It the rear rails on the frame - they somehow flex - all I did was to press the rear left side rail down and the slide assembly slid right over.
Anyway, thanks for the excellent report.
November 9th, 2005 05:50 PM
Good Report Thanks for the info
November 9th, 2005 08:38 PM
November 9th, 2005 09:06 PM
EXCELLENT REPORT!! GREAT INFO for the prospective Kahr buyers!
November 9th, 2005 09:25 PM
November 9th, 2005 09:36 PM
Thank you for the thorough review and comments. I have a PM9 as a constant companion (much easier to carry and conceal than my Ruger P97)...however, I certainly feel better armed with my P97 (45ACP). Now a smaller, lighter, flatter 45 sounds real nice.
Hopefully Kahr will come out w/ a CCW version that is less expensive, as is the CCW9.
I have shot the Glock 36 and found it to be unpleasant recoil wise...do you have any subjective comparisons to the G36?
Thank you again for a great report!
November 9th, 2005 09:37 PM
1951 - 2011
Hello and thank you for the informative report. I've not yet even seen or handled one of the .45 Kahr pistols.
Best and thanks again.
November 10th, 2005 10:06 AM
Thanks for the report!
I ordered my P45 2 days ago and I may have a chance to pick it up today. I opted to splurge for the night sights so I will post my thoughts on them once I have had the chance to try them out.
Like yourself I hope that the holster craftmen make holsters for this pistol soon so i can give it the CCW tryout.
Shoot well and be safe
"The trouble with our liberal friends are not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan
November 10th, 2005 11:23 AM
Thanks for the report...I had looked at the P45 and the K9 and decided on the K9, but may get one for a BUG in the truck. As for some leather, www.klnullholsters.com may be some help. He does some pretty good work according to the grapevine...I haven't ordered mine yet, but will soon for the K9.
noli nothis permittere te terere...
November 10th, 2005 02:55 PM
Kompact9...thanks for the link to Ken Null's work. I'm a fan of the IWB holsters exemplified by Eric Larsen with his COM, Gary Brommeland with his Max Con V and Sparks with their Watch 6 and Versa Max II (as well as other holstermakers) holsters. I did not see an example of that type of IWB holster on Null's website.
I discovered last night that my P45 fits perfectly in my Hume J.I.T. slide OWB holster (seen below) made for my CZ-40B. I don't use that holster much currently since I also have one of Larsen's excellent COM IWB holsters for my CZ. So, it looks like I have ready-made (albeit temporary) leathergear for my P45!
Thanks everyone for the great words about my review!
One thing I did not post in my review that I completely forgot to mention is that the trigger reset on the P45 is also very, very long.
USAF: Loving Our Obscene Amenities Since 1947
By bpang1 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: July 3rd, 2010, 01:40 AM
By BigJerm80 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: October 8th, 2008, 02:03 PM
By dr_cmg in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: February 4th, 2008, 12:25 AM
By dauff in forum General Firearm Discussion
Last Post: March 23rd, 2007, 10:57 PM
By randytulsa2 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
Last Post: July 12th, 2006, 12:10 AM
Search tags for this page
beretta 92 vertec
kahr .45 review
kahr 45 review
kahr arms p45 review
kahr p 45
kahr p45 review
kahr p45 reviews
p45 kahr review
Click on a term to search for related topics.
» DefensiveCarry Sponsors