I am considering 3 new C&C'S, any thoughts tauus 40 mil pro, glock 27, H&K P2000SK

This is a discussion on I am considering 3 new C&C'S, any thoughts tauus 40 mil pro, glock 27, H&K P2000SK within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I am considering 3 new conc and carry weapons, taurus 40 millennium pro 140bp, glock 27, H&K P2000SK. I am carrying a beretta 9000s now. ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: I am considering 3 new C&C'S, any thoughts tauus 40 mil pro, glock 27, H&K P2000SK

  1. #1
    New Member Array safrotin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    st louis mo
    Posts
    4

    I am considering 3 new C&C'S, any thoughts tauus 40 mil pro, glock 27, H&K P2000SK

    I am considering 3 new conc and carry weapons, taurus 40 millennium pro 140bp, glock 27, H&K P2000SK. I am carrying a beretta 9000s now. I also am curious what exactly the LEM trigger on the HK P2000 SK is exactly. I know it means law enforcement model, but not sure how it differs from the standard trigger.

    I would really appreciate all opinions.

    Thanks,

    Safrotin

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Member Array mutumbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    115
    i say go with the 27, its what i have (and LOVE) and will carry as soon as i get my liscense.

  4. #3
    JD
    JD is offline
    Administrator
    Array JD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    19,188
    The LEM is a double action only trigger as opposed to the standard DA/SA trigger of the P2000 or P2000SK, I don't recall what the trigger pull is.

    Of the three you have listed, I'd go with the G27, it's midway between prices on the Taurus and the HK.

    I don't care for the funny little paddle mag release thingamabob on the HKs, but I guess you could get used to it, at least they made it bigger on the P30, P3L, and HK45/45C.

    And if it's a debate between Glock and Taurus...well that's an easy one, Glock all the way. Taurus makes a fine gun, but they're not Glocks.

    Besides, Glock accessories are very common and easy to find.

  5. #4
    VIP Member Array NY27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,387
    Of the three I only have experience with the G27. It is my primary off-duty carry gun. Conceals well, shoots great and you can load the 23(compact) and 22(full size) mags into the 27 (sub compact).

    I carry mine in a Milt Sparks VM II IWB holster. Very comfortable set up.

    Good luck.
    Police Defensive Tactics, Firearms, Carbine Rifle and Taser Instructor
    Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member
    It is better to have your gun and not need it, than to need it and not have it!
    You cannot choose the conditions for a gunfight, so train in all conditions!

  6. #5
    Member Array SGeringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pierce Co. WA
    Posts
    330
    Of those three I'd go with the HK after having had time with my brother's P2000, followed by the G27 since I've long owned various GLOCKs. I would not own a Taurus.
    http://www.myspace.com/sgeringer
    SIG SP2009<>XD45 4"<>S&W 638-3<>GLOCK20<>Mossberg Mav88

  7. #6
    VIP Member Array pogo2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Southwest
    Posts
    3,149

    Glock or H&K

    I wouldn't buy a Taurus anything, and could be happy with either the Glock 27 or the H&K P2000sk. I'd try the latter two on for size and see which one you liked the best. The LEM trigger on the H&K is a double action only system that many people like.
    Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the Peoples' Liberty's Teeth." - George Washington

  8. #7
    Member Array bshoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Daytona Beach, FL
    Posts
    63
    I would go with the G27. I carry this gun all day long and have no problem doing it. They are all good guns, but I just trust Glock alittle more than the others.
    In Hoc Signo Vinces

  9. #8
    Senior Member Array slimjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    687
    I'd go H&K, then Glock. Try the LEM out before you buy it, it had too much uptake for me. I prefer the DA/SA but the single action on the H&K's are way too heavy. I usually have to dump a few more dollars into "fixing" those DA/SA triggers. I owned a G27, it was my least favorite Glock. Wound up trading it for a M&P 40C, and couldn't be any happier.
    A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity.
    -- Sigmund Freud

  10. #9
    VIP Member Array farronwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,768
    My suggestion is to go with the 140BP, only because I have a MilPro PT111, and I like it. I don't care for Glocks, and never shot an H&K, so you can take it for what it is worth.

    I suggest that you try to shoot all three of them if you can. That may help you make up your mind. If you can determine which one you like the best before buying your better off in the long run.
    Just remember that shot placement is much more important with what you carry than how big a bang you get with each trigger pull.
    www.ddchl.com
    Texas CHL Instructor
    Texas Hunter Education Instructor
    NRA Instructor

  11. #10
    Senior Member Array slimjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    687
    Nice informative article on H&K triggers, little old but...

    Firearms - The USP LEM Trigger Module by MarkFreburg

    Heckler & Koch (pronounced like "Coke") has recently developed a new fire control system for their line of USP semiauto pistols. It is called the LEM (Law Enforcement Modification) trigger. It was developed in response to the desire of some law enforcement agencies to have a DAO pistol that did not have the disadvantage of a relatively hard trigger pull. New LEM-equipped pistols are being produced for the LEO and civilian markets, but you're not likely to find any of them yet (as of late 2003) on the shelves of your favorite gun shop.

    However, being modular in design, any USP pistol can be converted to the LEM system. Once converted, the pistol can always be chanaged back to its original configuration, provided the original parts are retained. The set of parts needed to convert a USP pistol to LEM costs approximately $50. However, due to liability issues, H&K will not sell the parts directly. Rather, they require that you send them the pistol. They will make the conversion for $96 (parts and labor), test fire the weapon, and ship it back to you with a bag containing the original parts. I was told the conversion process would take 3 to 4 weeks, but I had my USP Compact .40 S&W back in less than 2 weeks.

    USP pistols come in a number of different fire control configurations (called "Variants" by H&K). There are now over 16 such configurations, although most lists (even their web site) only show about 10. The list seems somewhat confusing at first, but after review it becomes rather intuitive. There are TDA (Traditional Double Action) variants that can be obtained with a control lever that acts as just a decocking lever, or that acts as both a decocking lever and a safety lever. These can be obtained in right hand or left hand versions. That makes 4 variants. Then there are DAO (Double Action Only) variants that can be obtained with or without a safety lever on the right or left side. That's 4 more variants. And so on.... My H&K USP Compact was originally a Variant 1, which meant it was a TDA pistol, with a dual-purpose control lever on the left side of the pistol. That is the most common variant sold by H&K.

    All USP pistols come with a firing pin block that is disengaged when the trigger is pulled to the rear. Full-size versions of the USP have a spurred hammer, whereas Compact versions come with a bobbed hammer (for concealment purposes). In order to describe the new LEM trigger system, it will help to first review the TDA and DAO versions of the USP pistol.

    The DAO version is the simplest configuration. When the slide is cycled, either manually or by firing the pistol, the hammer follows the slide forward to a position just off the firing pin, Nothing is cocked in the pistol. Each time the pistol is fired, it is with a long, relatively heavy DA (Double Action) trigger pull of 10 to 12 pounds. H&K's are not known for a beautiful factory DA trigger pull, but that can be achieved easily by a number of gunsmiths. The DAO version can be obtained without a control lever, or with a frame-mounted control lever that has two positions: Position 1 (up) is Safe, and Position 2 (horizontal) is Fire. If the pistol is dry-fired (or fired with a dud round), the hammer will move all the way forward, resting on the firing pin. Cycling the slide a little, pulling the trigger a little, or pulling back the hammer a little will move the hammer back to it normal just-off-the-firing-pin position.

    The TDA version is the most common configuration. The control lever has three positions: Position 1 (up) is Safe, Position 2 (horizontal) is Fire, and Position 3 (down) is Decock. The lever is spring-loaded out of Position 3. When the slide is cycled, either manually or by firing the pistol, the hammer is cocked and remains rearward. At this point, the pistol can be fired in SA (Single Action) mode with a short, light 5-lb trigger.pull. If not immediately fired, the operating lever can be moved up into the Safe position for cocked-and-locked carry, or the operating lever can be moved down momentarily to the Decock position. This will decock the pistol, safely dropping the hammer to a position just off of the firing pin. The weapon is now in DA mode, and the pistol can be fired with a long, heavy trigger pull of 10 to 12 pounds. I should note that the operating lever can be placed in the Safe mode regardless of whether the hammer is cocked or not. Also, moving the control lever to the Safe position does not lock the slide. This gives the user the option of loading or unloading the pistol while it is in the Safe condition. Like the DAO version,if the pistol is dry-fired (or fired with a dud round), the hammer will move all the way forward, resting on the firing pin. Cycling the slide a little, pulling the trigger a little, or pulling back the hammer a little will move the hammer back to its normal ust-off-the-firing-pin position.

    Heckler & Koch was aware that many CCW-holders and law enforcement departments are uncomfortable with cocked-and-locked carry. They also knew that many people did not like the transition from DA to SA mode in TDA pistols. Although DAO pistols eliminated the need for such a transition, as well as eliminating the need for an external safety lever, they were often more difficult to achieve the best accuracy due to the long, heavy trigger pull required for each shot. The H&K LEM trigger, like the Para Ordnance LDA trigger, was designed to overcome these problems.

    The H&K LEM pistols, like their regular DAO models, can be obtained with or without a control lever safety. I chose to not have the lever retained when my pistol was converted to LEM. I did this for a number of reasons: (a) The safety isn't necessary; (b) No liability issues of whether the pistol was on safe or not prior to firing; (c) To eliminate concerns that the pistol might be accidentally put on Safe; (d) The pistol is more comfortable in an IWB holster without the control lever; and (e) The absence of the control lever gives a cleaner access to the slide lock release lever. Other owners may have different priorities and may opt for having the control lever present. The LEM pistols have a two-part hammer -- an internal hammer and an external hammer. When the slide is cycled, either manually or by firing the pistol, the internal hammer is cocked but the eternal hammer follows the slide forward to its normal just-off-the-firing-pin position. The trigger is in its forward position. To fire the weapon, the trigger is pulled rearward through a long, light trigger pull of something less than 2 pounds. Near the end of that trigger stroke, resistance is encountered. If additional force is then applied to the trigger, the pistol will fire, cycle, and start all over again.

    The LEM fire control module can be obtained in either of two trigger pulls. The "light trigger" is 4.5 to 5.5 pounds. The "heavy trigger" is 7.5 to 8.5 pounds. I chose the light trigger for my USP conversion. When I received the pistol back from Sterling, VA, the trigger measured just under 5.5 pounds on my RCBS trigger pull gauge. I anticipate that it will lighten up a little with use.

    H&K advertises that their LEM trigger has a "very short trigger reset." I found this interesting, because the very long trigger reset is one of the main disadvantages (for me) of my Para Ordnance LDA pistol. I also wondered how they could have a short trigger reset, when the trigger had to move forward into its DAO position after firing. Well, here is one of the main advantages of the H&K LEM trigger over the P-O LDA trigger. After firing an LEM-equipped H&K USP pistol, the slide cycles faster than the shooter can release the trigger. This occurs in all semiauto pistols. If one fires the LEM pistol, and keeps the trigger back after firing, the hammer remains back! At this point, the shooter can let the trigger go forward just a short distance; the trigger will reset, the hammer will stay to the rear, and the pistol will be ready to fire again. If this is done repeatedly, firing the pistol will be just like firing a pistol in SA mode. There will be short trigger pulls of about 5 lbs, short resets, and hammer staying cocked after each shot. However, if the shooter lets the trigger go all the way forward after firing it, the hammer will go forward to its normal just-off-the-firing-pin position. At this point, the pistol will be in the same condition that it was after initially loading, and it may be safely holstered. Although the internal hammer remains cocked, letting the trigger go forward is almost like "decocking" the external hammer, but without having to manipulate a decocking lever.

    There is another difference beween the H&K LEM trigger and the P-O LDA trigger. Like the other USP versions, if the LEM version is dry-fired, the hammer will go all the way forward and will be resting against the firing pin. At this point, unlike the P-O LDA, the trigger on the LEM can be pulled (against a very strong hammer spring) and a second strike on the primer can be obtained, if one wishes. This is not an advertised feature, but it exists nonetheless. I don't find it very useful--the chances of a factory primer not being fully seated are rather remote, and I believe that performing a "Tap-Rack-Bang" procedure is the best recovery. Besides, the hammer spring on the LEM version is stronger than on H&K's other pistols (for primer strike reliability), and the trigger pull required to achieve a second strike is substantial. I was unable to measure it, but I'd estimate that it is in the 16 to 20 pound range.

    So, there you have it. The functioning of the LEM version of the Heckler & Koch USP pistol is similar to that of the Para Ordnance LDA models. However, unlike the LDA pistols, the H&K LEM trigger has a short reset. I should note that the term "very short reset" used by H&K is somewhat of a misnomer. It is definitely very much shorter than my P-O LDA pistol, and it is even shorter than my Rugers or the original USP TDA reset. But it is not as short as my Kimber 1911 pistols. It is about the same as the reset distance on my Glocks.

    A word of caution... I have mentioned dry-firing here several times. The reader should be advised that, due to the design of the USP firing pin and firing pin block, significant stress is placed on the firing pin during dry firing. Because repeated applications of this stress can lead to firing pin breakage, Heckler & Koch recommends that snap caps be used when dry firing. I initially disregarded this advise, and my firing pin broke after a few weeks. H&K replaced it at no charge when I shipped the slide back to them, but it could have been avoided. And changing the firing pin on a USP is considerably tougher than on a 1911. Not only must the firing pin, firing pin spring, firing pin block, and firing pin block spring be held captive during the process, but the entire mechanism is held in with a roll pin, rather than a stop like the 1911.
    A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity.
    -- Sigmund Freud

  12. #11
    VIP Member Array KenpoTex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    2,193
    Glock...H&Ks are expensive and the customer service sucks. Taurus, well...no comment (if ya can't say something nice...)
    "Being a predator isn't always comfortable but the only other option is to be prey. That is not an acceptable option." ~Phil Messina

    If you carry in Condition 3, you have two empty chambers. One in the weapon...the other between your ears.

    Matt K.

  13. #12
    Senior Member Array fatboy97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Land of 10k Lakes
    Posts
    1,082
    I have to say that I love Glock's reliability and track record, just look at my collection.

    That said, you need to find a range that rents the any guns you are considering and shoot them all for yourself... you may find that you like one gun over the other two, and you should buy that gun.
    Be Observant and Be Safe.

    Current: S&W 442, Springfield XD9sc, XDm9, and Glock G26, G19, G23C,
    and SIG P226-40 TT, and Ruger GP-100, and Beretta 92FS
    Former: Taurus 92SS, SIG P220 TT, S&W 360, SIG P239-40, Ruger 22/45 MKII

  14. #13
    VIP Member Array Thanis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    2,347
    Shoot them (via rent or friend) 1st.

    HK & Sig are often considered better than Glock (I don't, but the price tag does). HK is a nice gun (some people love them). But if I were to buy a gun considered better than a Glock, get a Sig. I don't really like Sigs either, but I understand why some LE prefer the Sig. Unfortunately it is getting hard for me to like any gun more then how it feels to shoot a Glock.

    I have always had trouble with the Taurus semi-autos trigger. However you own and have carried a Beretta, so maybe this is the right choice for you. The price is always a pull if you have confidence in the piece. Taurus feel little Berettas (gee I wonder why). I'm not a big Beretta fan. Then again, triggers can always be changed. Taurus resale and trade value is not high IMO.

    I like the factory Glock trigger. I would go with the Glock.
    Last edited by Thanis; September 4th, 2008 at 10:33 PM.

  15. #14
    Senior Member Array Warmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    The Old Dominion
    Posts
    609
    Are you considering one of or all three? I've gone sorta crazy since getting my permit in July - buying three guns; H&K USPc 40 LEM, Glock 27 and a Taurus 617. I would suggest looking at the USPc if you are thinking .40 cal or a P30 if 9mm. If getting three, I would also suggest making one of those a snub.
    Attached Images
    I always aim for the right eye...and I never miss - Goldeneye

  16. #15
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    15,848
    I would pick the HK ,then the G27. I have shot all 3 pistols and once owned a Taurus PT140 (note I do not have the PT). The HK is well worth the money but the Glock is a good choice too.
    Best way is try to shoot all the guns and pick what feels best to you.
    "In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson


    Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Thoughts/Experiences with Glock 23 Gen 4
    By GunLuvnLibrl in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: January 12th, 2011, 09:28 PM
  2. Thoughts on trading my GLOCK 26 for a S&W M&P 40C
    By crf3973 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: July 24th, 2010, 07:46 PM
  3. Glock 36 or better. Your thoughts?
    By Curtis27 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: December 29th, 2008, 08:32 PM
  4. Glock 23, HK P2000SK or Kimber Ultra Carry?
    By Air,Land&Sea in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: December 12th, 2007, 06:31 PM
  5. Glock, XD, Sig, HK - My Thoughts
    By freetrapper in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: December 2nd, 2007, 09:23 AM

Search tags for this page

40 mil glock

,
45 mil glock
,
can the hammer spring be lightened up on kimber predator pistol
,
dry fire p30 lem
,
glock 40 mil
,
p2000sk glock 27
,
rate the taurus 140bp
,
taurus 140 bp
,
taurus 140 bp reviews
,

taurus 140bp

,

taurus 140bp review

,

taurus 140bp reviews

,
taurus millenium looks like hk p2000 sk
,
taurus millennium pro 140 bp
,
what is a glock 23 40 mil worth.
Click on a term to search for related topics.