Airweight S&W

This is a discussion on Airweight S&W within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I'm wondering, because of the light weight, just how rough these pistols are to shoot? Seems like they would be hard to control, and pretty ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Airweight S&W

  1. #1
    Senior Member Array Paladin132's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    West Virginia

    Airweight S&W

    I'm wondering, because of the light weight, just how rough these pistols are to shoot? Seems like they would be hard to control, and pretty peppy.

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    Senior Member Array Hydrashok Glock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location...Location. Ohio
    Suprisingly, to me, the recoil is not that bad. Now it does have some spunk but with a good grip and stance very controllable.
    The choices you make today define you of who you are tommorow

    When you see the light at the end of the tunnel your life is not over..... it is just about to begin

    COPS Protective Services

  4. #3
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Central Florida
    Depends...on what round you are shooting.
    You could make it a pleasure or scary...
    The last Blood Moon Tetrad for this millennium starts in April 2014 and ends in September 2015...according to NASA.

    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member[/B]

  5. #4
    VIP Member Array JAT40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    I have seen it blister a soft hand after a box of +p (wood grips)
    While people are saying "Peace and safety," destruction will come on them suddenly, ... and they will not escape. 1Th 5:3

  6. #5
    VIP Member Array semperfi.45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Over here now!
    IMO recoil control and sensitivity depends on the shooter. A .38 Airweight has a little snap but it's not uncontrollable. They are meant to be carried a lot and shot a little.
    Training means learning the rules. Experience means learning the exceptions.

  7. #6
    VIP Member Array sass20485's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Central FL
    With some practice and getting used to, they are controllable, but I'd not shoot .357 mags.

  8. #7
    Member Array carver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    East TX
    Quote Originally Posted by Paladin132 View Post
    I'm wondering, because of the light weight, just how rough these pistols are to shoot? Seems like they would be hard to control, and pretty peppy.
    All the little light .38's do have some recoil! However, you must remember their place as a SD handgun. They are ment to be carried comfortably, and easily, while still giving you the ability to defend yourself in a deadly confrontation. I own three at present, and have owned several down through the years. I have found that with practice they will get the job done. They are "pretty peppy", as you say, but are not that hard to control for me. My wife on the other hand perfers the SP101 stoked with .38's. The heavier weight gives less recoil, but she will not shoot it with .357's, she says it's just too much, and really hurts her hand.
    Y'all be safe now, ya hear!

    The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
    Thomas Jefferson

  9. #8
    Member Array bameroni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Marietta GA
    I am a fairly new owner of a S&W Model 642 and to be honest I was unable to discern the difference in recoil between the 642 and models 60 & 640; all with the same stock grips and .38 ammo. Since I'd only had experience with semi's before (and very limited experience at that) the challenge with the 642 was getting used to the firing with a short barrel and the heavier trigger weight. I had gun store staff telling me that the kick would be too much and I wouldn't be able to shoot more than 20 rounds at a time - they were suggesting I get a 640 - but I'm very happy with the 642. I am breaking it in with 50 rounds each trip to the range and am finally getting used to the trigger (took 3 trips) and can shoot 5 rounds in a matter of seconds getting COM at 7 yards with no problem. I've now started carrying it and because of the size and weight I have easy and quick options - IWB, pocket, and now SmartCarry.
    Glock 26, Ruger LCR, Glock 19
    Non curo. Si metrum non habet, non est poema. "I don't care. If it doesn't rhyme, it isn't a poem."

  10. #9
    Senior Member Array hudsonvalley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    lower hudson valley ny
    Once, while at the range, the man shooting in the next booth asked if I'd like to try his new lightweight revolver.....
    Product: Model 329PD - HIVIZ®
    I notice a 1/2 full box of full-blown 44 mag on the counter and beads of sweat across his forehead.....I smiled and said, "thanks, but no thanks", and went back to my Hammerli sweat on my brow.....why won't they practice with something that won't hurt so bad...?
    Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives.
    ---Ronald Reagan

  11. #10
    Member Array Horsetrader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    now: here and there
    S&W 329 26 oz. empty and it is an N frame..... lightweight ? ....airweight ? Don't think so. My S&W637 weighs 15 oz empty. But I get your point about practicing with a hand cannon and pain. Still......... if that weapon is what makes him feel secure and prepared, then by all means he should practice with that hand cannon until he can hit where he aims. Pain (and sweat) or no pain.

  12. #11
    Member Array Thiokol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Orland Park, Illinois
    I have a 442 that is rated for +P ammo. It's an accurate little revolver and the recoil is not bad at all with the rubber boot grips that came with the gun.
    U.S. Air Force Veteran
    ISRA Member
    NRA Member
    Smith & Wesson Collectors Association Member #2262

  13. #12
    Senior Member Array PaulJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    I got an Airweight. It is controllable, but not a "fun to shoot" gun. As others said, it is meant to be an easily concealable self defense gun. In that roll, it is perfect. Just make sure you shoot +P ammo at the range, so you are not surprised if you shoot it in a SD situation.

    (I got mine with a laser. I think for these small barrel guns the laser makes a difference)
    I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend. (Thomas Jefferson)

  14. #13
    VIP Member
    Array Hopyard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006

    It really is an individual thing

    Quote Originally Posted by bameroni View Post
    I had gun store staff telling me that the kick would be too much and I wouldn't be able to shoot more than 20 rounds at a time - they were suggesting I get a 640 - but I'm very happy with the 642.
    This is so individual. Ask me and ask my son, and you get two completely different comments. He is younger (obviously), stronger (by far), and can't stand this for more than a few shots. It doesn't bother me at all.

    There is a reason there are so many different makes and models of gun on the market. Different strokes for different folks.

  15. #14
    VIP Member Array First Sgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Florence, SC
    I have a S&W 642 and shot it straight out of the box to qualify for my CWP. I did NOT use +p ammo. I used a good mid-grain and had NO trouble handling it whatsoever. Since, according to the statistics that members quote, most SD encounters occur within 21 feet or less, I think a good mid-grain load is more than sufficient to gain a BG's attention. IMO of course.
    Sometimes in life you have to stand your ground. It's a hard lesson to learn and even most adults don't get it, but in the end only I can be responsible for my life. If faced with any type of adversity, only I can overcome it. Waiting for someone else to take responsibility is a long fruitless wait.

  16. #15
    Senior Member Array fatboy97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Land of 10k Lakes
    IMO, a great light weight carry option, but... not a range gun... therefore, not a gun I was willing to keep... I believe you need to practice a lot with each before they really become a gun I'm willing to carry.
    Be Observant and Be Safe.

    Current: S&W 442, Springfield XD9sc, XDm9, and Glock G26, G19, G23C,
    and SIG P226-40 TT, and Ruger GP-100, and Beretta 92FS
    Former: Taurus 92SS, SIG P220 TT, S&W 360, SIG P239-40, Ruger 22/45 MKII

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Airweight durability
    By Sonic82 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: February 10th, 2011, 04:08 PM
  2. New to me Airweight
    By AKsrule in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: January 31st, 2010, 08:01 PM
  3. Any thoughts on S&W 442 Airweight?
    By darkstar11 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: January 31st, 2010, 08:37 AM
  4. New s&w 642 airweight
    By OILMAN69 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: August 12th, 2009, 12:50 AM
  5. S&W 442 Airweight
    By paper killer in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: October 18th, 2007, 06:49 PM

Search tags for this page

642 torture test
airweight s&w

s&w 317 airweight

s&w 317 torture test

s&w 317-2

s&w 360 airweight
s&w airweight 317

smith and wesson 317-2 airweight


smith and wesson 360 airweight

smith and wesson 360 scandium airweight
smith and wesson model 360 airweight 38 special
smith&wesson 642 torture tests
Click on a term to search for related topics.