CCW Sig or Taurus

CCW Sig or Taurus

This is a discussion on CCW Sig or Taurus within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; This has been a question I have debated WAY too long. I presently own a SIG 239 in .9mm ( great gun) I have been ...

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: CCW Sig or Taurus

  1. #1
    kf [OP]
    kf is offline
    New Member Array kf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006

    CCW Sig or Taurus

    This has been a question I have debated WAY too long.

    I presently own a SIG 239 in .9mm ( great gun) I have been looking for a small.45 for a long time.

    I am not a glock fan, and decided on the Taurus PT 145.

    Now the issue. Do I give up the Sig reliability for the Taurus just to gain 2 rounds and move up to .45?

    any advice??


    Be Safe

  2. #2
    Lead Moderator
    Array HotGuns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    A question that only you can answer.

    Either one will serve you well.
    Universal Background Checks...the next step towards registration and confiscation.

    AR. CHL Instr. 07/02 FFL
    Like custom guns and stuff? Check this out...

  3. #3
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Personally I don't trust Taurus for quality. I feel Sig is much better. But it's your decision to make.
    "In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." Thomas Jefferson

    Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

  4. Remove Advertisements

  5. #4
    Senior Moderator
    Array RETSUPT99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Central Florida
    It's your decision, if it were mine...or those two, I go with the Sig, but that's me. OMO
    Proverbs 27:12 says: “The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and suffer for it.”

    Certified Glock Armorer
    NRA Life Member

  6. #5
    Ex Member Array Ram Rod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Fayetteville, AR
    Well, first off

    Secondly, I think you spelled things out for yourself:
    Now the issue. Do I give up the Sig reliability for the Taurus just to gain 2 rounds and move up to .45?
    I wouldn't give up known reliability for anything actually. Is the 45acp something to want and have? Absolutely! If there is any way you can retain your P239 and get the PT145, do it. That way you'll always have something to fall back on, and be secure in your quest. If you have to give up your SIG P239 in order to obtain the PT145, then it's a jump into the abyss for you. Personally, I'd stick with what has never let me down over the unknown. If you don't, you'd be gaining nothing. If you can retain your P239 and get the PT145, then go for it. Otherwise, place your bet on the tried and true.

  7. #6
    VIP Member
    Array srfl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Welcome to the forum.
    USAF: Loving Our Obscene Amenities Since 1947

  8. #7
    Senior Member Array mr surveyor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Texas, South of the Sabine


  9. #8
    VIP Member Array cmdrdredd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    South Florida
    SIG, but if you must have .45acp get a good 1911. You'll spend more but in the end have a better weapon.

    If you want polymer and Glock isn't your thing check out the S&W M&P which is a spectacular weapon system. Maybe even an HK45 compact if you have the funds to go that route which is a most excellent gun in every aspect.
    No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
    -Thomas Jefferson

    Laws are restrictive but sometimes necessary to maintain a civil society. Rights are nonrestrictive but are always necessary to maintain a free society.

  10. #9
    VIP Member Array farronwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    That is something your going to have to decide. If you run the PT145 through its paces and it proves to be reliable, eats the ammo, spits it out, and doesn't give you any other problems, then I see no reason not to carry it.

    I have two Taurus', one PT111 that I have been carrying for a while and a 24/7 that I just recently got. I will switch them out for daily carry depending on certain circumstances. Both being 9mm. so I can't really argue that carrying a .45 is that much better, since one of them gives me 12 +1 and the other one gives me 17 +1. I have a .45 but carry it rarely.

    One of the other members here has a Sig in .40, but chooses to carry a PT145 instead.

    It is your choice. If both are reliable it is a tough call.
    Just remember that shot placement is much more important with what you carry than how big a bang you get with each trigger pull.
    Texas CHL Instructor
    Texas Hunter Education Instructor
    NRA Instructor

  11. #10
    Array SIXTO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Quote Originally Posted by kf View Post
    Do I give up the Sig reliability for the Taurus just to gain 2 rounds and move up to .45?
    No way, no how.
    "Just blame Sixto"

    I reserve the right to make fun, point and laugh etc.

  12. #11
    Senior Member Array Sergeant Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    You might consider the Springfield XD. It's not EXACTLY like the Glock (feels better to me, and has a more "normal" trigger), and comes in a compact version.

    In case you haven't noticed, the Taurus Millenium Series pistols are striker-fired, just like the Glocks and XDs.....

  13. #12
    Member Array AgentX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Keep the SIG and spend money on ammo and training. The .45 doesn't give you anything better self-defense-wise. A real combat shooting course will have a true payoff.

    If you want a .45 just to have a .45, and have the disposible income, go ahead and get one...but the SIG you already have is a truly fine pistol.

    If you want to make a practical upgrade, perhaps look at some XS Big Dot sights.

    Or sell the SIG and get 2 9mm Glocks.

  14. #13
    Member Array Martial Archer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    South Carolina
    I'd trust my life to Sig...
    NRA Endowment Member
    GOA Life Member

  15. #14
    VIP Member Array pogo2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006

    Heckler & Koch

    From a reliability standpoint, I believe that going from Sig to Taurus is a downhill move. There is nothing wrong with a Sig P239 in 9mm for carry, but if you want a polymer frame .45 CCW gun with 10 shot capability, I think the best one on the market is the HK 45c, as shown in this photo below by Ken Lunde:

    Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the Peoples' Liberty's Teeth." - George Washington

  16. #15
    Lead Moderator
    Array rstickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Laurel, MD
    Stay with the SIG!

    If you really MUST have a .45 take a look at the SIG 220 series, I know the SAO trigger on my 220 is really smooth.......

    EOD - Initial success or total failure

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Sponsored Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Taurus?
    By steve63 in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: December 9th, 2014, 10:13 AM
  2. taurus 738 TCP
    By kahr in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: April 29th, 2010, 09:54 PM
  3. Need some help - trade Taurus PT140 for Taurus M85 titanium?
    By pcon in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: February 25th, 2009, 08:44 PM
  4. Taurus PT-111 Vs. Kel-Tec
    By Mikey in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: November 30th, 2008, 05:46 PM
  5. Anyone own a Taurus 24/7?
    By TN_Mike in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: November 24th, 2008, 05:19 PM

Search tags for this page

sig 226 vs taurus pt111
sig 239 vs taurus pt111

sig or taurus

sig p239 vs. taurus 24/7
taures sig .45
taurus 40 millenium vs sig p239
taurus firearms pt 111 millinium vs sig sauerp250

taurus pt145 vs sig p239

taurus vs sig for ccw
Click on a term to search for related topics.