This is a discussion on The Best Defense CC gun rating system. within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I was watching The Best Defense the other night on the Outdoor Channel, and they did a segment on a concealed carry gun rating system ...
I was watching The Best Defense the other night on the Outdoor Channel, and they did a segment on a concealed carry gun rating system where they would rank the gun on a 1000 point scale. Has anyone else seen this review system? And where I can find more reviews done with this system.
I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop!!
Politically Incorrect Self Defense
I'd like to see the results.
It's probably the more expensive the gun, the higher it rates.
If it were a fair and accurate system, it would answer alot of people's questions.
No defensive rating system is going to work. No way they can take all the variables into account. What may be the "best" defensive weapon for me my just totally suck for you.
I don't really see this sort of rating system as a useful concept. Choosing a firearm for self defense is such an individual thing it's hard to see how a single scale like this could be useful. A handgun that I rate very highly, like my Glock 21, may be completely unusable for someone with smaller hands, or who can't effectively conceal such a large weapon. How do you assign a rating that would describe it's usefulness for both of us?
1. Time to first hit on target (one handed)
2. Accurracy of hits on target after 1st hit in 3 seconds
3. Knockdown factor
Colt Defender 45ACP - score 827/1000
Berretta 950B Minx 22 short - score 218/1000
S&W 342 38 Special - score 751/1000
Colt DS-II 38 Special - score 684/1000
the crazy thing is that he rates the cun for CC by seeing how fast he can pick the gun up off of a table and hit the target. Since our gun will be on us in a holster, and not sitting on a table, its a very flawed test. The only part of the test that is infomative is the "One shot knock down factor", Or the scale they use that states how likely one shot will drop a man. Not kill them, but drop them. Even this scale has way to many variables, but I guess they go by statistics.
........Im Larry Potterfield, and thats the way it is..
Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it ......
It's imperfect to say the least, but I've never heard of a comparative one. Just another blip to mull over.
"Each worker carried his sword strapped to his side." Nehemiah 4:18
Guns Save Lives. Paramedics Save Lives. But...
Paramedics With Guns Scare People!
Seems like they need to rate a few more guns and calibers! Only three calibers and four guns? No 9mm? No 40mm? They tested 22 but not 380? The didn't test any Glocks?
Sorry but that segment of Best Defense is a waste of time. The section on follow up shots is so much in the hands of the shooter it isn't even funny.
The Second Amendment ...... Because crime SHOULD be a hazardous occupation.
If you want to piss off a conservative, lie to him.
If you want to piss off a liberal, tell him the truth.
On the scale he uses why is the .357 Mag so low on it? On one stop stopping power that is. I don't like his tests. And what gun got the 1000/1000?
using the term "knockdown" as a criterion tells me all I really need to know about the objectivity of the evaluation...
"Being a predator isn't always comfortable but the only other option is to be prey. That is not an acceptable option." ~Phil Messina
If you carry in Condition 3, you have two empty chambers. One in the weapon...the other between your ears.
A man fires a rifle for many years, and he goes to war. And afterward he turns the rifle in at the armory, and he believes he's finished with the rifle. But no matter what else he might do with his hands - love a woman, build a house, change his son's diaper - his hands remember the rifle.