This is a discussion on Smith & Wesson 642 vs 638 within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Originally Posted by semperfi.45 With practice the Airweight's trigger can be staged to a single action shot. This^^^^ I can shoot my j frames slow ...
You could go to trial in different states or even counties or cities within a state and get several different verdict depending on where the trial was held, make up of the jury at the time, and most importantly who the prosecutor is (liberal and anti gun, or conservative and pro gun) and how good your attorney is a doing his job, so again its really useless to surmise on outcomes for the most part, and a J Frame with a hammer ( cocked or not) is no more likely or less likely to get you convicted of a criminal shooting unless it was a “bad shooting” anyway.
Last edited by pirate; May 27th, 2009 at 09:21 PM.
When I leave the home port:
S&W 642 Airweight, Ruger SP 101, Colt Detective Spec., CZ RAMI, Kahr PM9, Kahr CW40, S&W Model 10-7, Glock 30, 19, and 26, Browning Hi Power, CZ82, Colt Commander, Dan Wesson PM7, Ruger LCP
There was recently a good discussion of this on the Pro Arms podcast, where Massad Ayoob does quite a good job of explaining why prosecutors and plaintiff's lawyers pursue this sort of theory in an effort to get convictions and civil judgments.
ditto what Wormy said. I love my SA/DA 637 and carry it daily "in the field"
642 keeps the lint and critters out when you pocket carry or even waist carry.
Well, shrouded vs. hammerless, I prefer the latter. The 638 has a pleasant feel to it although the design has always left me feeling somewhat perplexed. I never felt comfortable pulling the hammer back with the skimpy pad of my thumb. Likewise, I feel the shroud makes cleaning more difficult. As a LEO when revolvers were standard issue, I can shoot DA or SA without much compromise. As for CC, I prefer DAO.
“Monsters are real and so are ghosts. They live inside of us, and sometimes they win.”
~ Stephen King
I totally agree with the lint-goobers that would get into the hammer channel from your pocket. I got a 642 and love it.
Change We Can Believe In 01.20.13 Gun Control is Being Able to Hit Your Target.
DUst Bunnies arent an issue with my stainless 638, it lives in my tacklebox. Even tho I think it is ugly as home made soap, I still like them better than the hammerless models.
I have both, but carry my 638. the reason is that i seem to shoot it better than the 642. There's a slight difference in the feel of the grip that seems to give me more control. Others will have different results.
i agree no time to cock a hammer when your being approached by a potential attacker. i have a 442 and find the heavy trigger good, prevents "accidental" discharge.
I went for the 638 over the 642.
I like the single action option, even if I never use it.
As a side note, I did go back to put the 642 on layaway a few days after buying the 638, but the little guy was sold.
My dealer rarely has S&W snubs on his shelves, and they don't last long when he snags a couple. [small shop]
The 638 allowing the gun to be cocked in to SA has little place for CCW in my opinion. Also it is pretty hard to lower the hammer on those guns, especially under duress.
Some of us use our firearms as CCW's for more than just "bad guys" of the two legged variety. Having the option to thumb the hammer back to make a more precise shot than the typical com shot on a "bad guy" (of the two legged variety) is very important. Your experiences may vary
I have and use both DAO and SA/DA.....I can use either equally well...and as long
as you are careful not to get junk in the action, you should be ok.
I like the idea of being able to cock and use SA if I want to....of course
one has to know that in an emergency situation, it is unlikely that you will
have time to make an "aimed" single action shot.
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government--lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." --Patrick Henry