642 PowerPort vs regular 642 (short review)

This is a discussion on 642 PowerPort vs regular 642 (short review) within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; I have been a fan of J-frame revolvers for a while. My BUG is a 642. I recently saw the new 642 “PowerPort” and decided ...

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 642 PowerPort vs regular 642 (short review)

  1. #1
    New Member Array rock71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    sc
    Posts
    3

    642 PowerPort vs regular 642 (short review)

    I have been a fan of J-frame revolvers for a while. My BUG is a 642. I recently saw the new 642 “PowerPort” and decided to give it a try. This model seems to address the two biggest faults I have with the regular 642, namely the sights and the stout recoil. This is a brief non-scientific review. I was limited in my ammunition selection, and only shot a few rounds of each. The results should be considered as representative and not definitive. I shot some groups from 25 yards and chronoed the results. I was interested to see if the “PowerPort” would affect velocity. I shot both 125 grain Gold Dots, and 158 SWC from each gun. The Gold Dots averaged 757fps out of the 642s 1 -7/8 inch barrel. They averaged 801fps out of the 642PP 2- 1/8 inch barrel. The 158s averaged 735fps out of the 642, and 747fps out of the 642PP. It seems that both rounds are a little faster out of the PowerPort version.

    Accuracy for both guns was similar despite the “better” sights on the PowerPort gun. The standard 642 comes with a notch rear and a ramped front sight. I have always had trouble picking up the front sight with this setup. The PowerPort gun has the same notch in the rear but has a big white dot sight dovetailed into the front. This is much easier to pick up. It also offers the option of drifting the sight for windage if needed. The 642 shot 5 Gold Dots into 4.38” and 5 158s into 6.12” @25 yards. The PowerPort put 5 Gold Dots into 5.75” (4 into 4.49”), and 5 158s into 6.50. These were the first rounds fired by the PowerPort and the trigger is still a bit stiff. I’ll call accuracy a draw,but the PP sights seem better regulated. The 642 hits low and right with no way to adjust. I added a set of Crimson Trace grips to the PowerPort gun. So with the laser and the big dot sight, I expect that this gun will have a big advantage in low light. Neither gun seemed to prefer the 158s.

    If you have ever shot a 642, you know that recoil is a bit harsh. For the life of me, I can’t imagine shooting one of the .357 guns. The PowerPort seems to help a bit with recoil. It went from brutal with the 642 to stout but manageable with the PP. Maybe it’s the difference between a .44 magnum and a .357 magnum? In a real life shooting I doubt that anyone would notice, but it might be more fun to practice with the PP. Some people have said that the PowerPort might ruin your night vision by directing the flash up into your line of sight. Well, the fireball from a 1-7/8” 642 is just short of a Mosin Nagant, so I say that argument is moot anyway. I’ll try to shoot it some at night for comparison.
    I know that this is a short review, but I have seen quite a few questions across the web regarding the PowerPort. I hope that this answers some of them. Be Safe.

    The guns




    The sight and port


    Sight picture 642


    Sight picture PowerPort


    Gold Dot targets (should say 125 GD instead of 135)



  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member Array TWO GUNS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    2,646
    Thanks for the review.
    Have Fun and Shoot Straight !!

  4. #3
    Senior Member Array puncho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    South
    Posts
    521
    Great review!

  5. #4
    VIP Member
    Array TX-JB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    5,738
    Great Review! Very interesting results...
    "Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas!".... Sam Houston

    Retired LEO
    Firearms Instructor
    NRA Life Member

  6. #5
    Senior Member Array sheepdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    691
    Thank you for the observations, especially the chron info. I love my 642, but wish it had a sight like the new PowerPort version. Would you describe the muzzle blast from the port as distracting, noticeable, or negligible? TIA
    What Would Gumby Do?

  7. #6
    New Member Array rock71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    sc
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by sheepdog View Post
    Thank you for the observations, especially the chron info. I love my 642, but wish it had a sight like the new PowerPort version. Would you describe the muzzle blast from the port as distracting, noticeable, or negligible? TIA
    I really don't think the port makes much difference with the blast. The 642 already makes a huge fireball at night. I wish I could get it on camera.

  8. #7
    Member Array Kenny256's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Bolivar MO
    Posts
    342
    My brother has the reg 642 and I have the power port, shooting is better on the PP, and I do like the big sight on the front A LOT better.

    I have never had an issue with the port what so ever. I have never really tested accuracy on either of them, but I think the PP would help with quick shots vs slow aimed ones.

    Good review though by the way!
    Carry-S&W 642
    HD-Remington 870

    The Dalai Lama:"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun."

  9. #8
    VIP Member Array NCHornet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mt Airy, NC
    Posts
    2,156
    I myself don't care for magna porting, or porting of any kind on a wheel gun, let alone a snub nose wheel gun. While the blast is about the same, it's the direction of this blast that could be bad in a SD situation. Glad it works for you, but I will keep my 649 Bodyguard just as it is with only one hole in the barrel!!

    NCH
    When Seconds Count, The Cops Are Just Minutes Away!!
    Carry On!
    NCHornet

  10. #9
    VIP Member Array 10thmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,954
    Yup. Hope you never need to fire a ported gun from close retention, and end up with blast in your face and eyes.

    Save porting for competition guns, NOT for defensive guns. Bad idea...very very bad.
    The more good folks carry guns, the fewer shots the crazies can get off.
    www.armedcitizensnetwork.org - member
    Glock 30, 19, 26; Ruger SP101, LCR, LCP (2), Mini 14; Marlin 336 .30-30; Mossberg 500
    CT Lasers

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Short Ruger Service Department Review
    By Diddle in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: January 4th, 2011, 08:53 AM
  2. Short Review: Ruger Customer Service
    By Diddle in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: December 6th, 2009, 09:39 PM
  3. 642 Powerport Pro review
    By odyssey in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 28th, 2009, 07:33 AM
  4. Crossbreed Super-Tuck Deluxe Arrives - Short Review
    By BluesStringer in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: January 25th, 2008, 09:16 PM
  5. Stephen Camp's ''Paid in Full" - short review
    By P95Carry in forum Off Topic & Humor Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: November 19th, 2005, 10:13 AM

Search tags for this page

642 power port

,

642 powerport

,
642 powerport review
,

s&w 642 power port

,

s&w 642 power port review

,
s&w 642 powerport
,
s&w 642 powerport review
,
s&w 642 pro review
,
s&w 642 review
,

smith & wesson 642 powerport revolver

,

smith and wesson 642 power port

,
smith and wesson 642 power port review
Click on a term to search for related topics.