Sig 239 vs Glock 33 for IWB
I know most people compare the 239 with the G32 as they are more similiar in overall dimensions but I am interested in how the G33 stacks up against the 239 in relation to carry IWB. I don't care about the differences in the action or the triggers, etc. I am only concerned about which one you would prefer to comfortable CCW.
L W H Wt
239 = 6.6, 1.2, 5.1, 28
G33 = 6.3, 1.18, 5.0, 20
The glock has the advantage in most aspects but the Sig even though its listed as wider, seems like it would be much more comfortable for IWB than the blocky glock. I guess the numbers don't lie but would love to hear form people who have tworn both.
Length = is no big deal since many people here have said that Length is not that important for IWB concealment.
Height is a ties.
Width is also a tie, Sig even though its listed as wider, seems like it would be much more comofrtable for IWB than the blocky glock. Maybe its the rounded appearence of the thinner grip, I dunno but I guess the numbers don't lie. Actually anyone know what that sig width measurement is based off??
Weight - glock wins hands down. But many have also said that with a good belt holster, weight should not be a factor
So, I would love to hear form people who have worn both. Which do you prefer and why?