Range Report, Taurus PT145 Millenium Pro

This is a discussion on Range Report, Taurus PT145 Millenium Pro within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; The coffee pot's in the back of the room!!...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Range Report, Taurus PT145 Millenium Pro

  1. #16
    Senior Member Array Divebum47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    763
    The coffee pot's in the back of the room!!
    "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups"

  2. Remove Ads

  3. #17
    VIP Member Array BugDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Gulf Coast of Florida
    Posts
    9,315
    Hey guys, yall wanna go get a few beers? I'm buying!!!

    Wait...that's what got me kicked out of AA.
    Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
    No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.


    Guns are like sex and air...its no big deal until YOU can't get any.

  4. #18
    Member Array Old Marine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    106
    I've been daily carrying the 145 for some time now and have really grown to like it very well! I agree it is quite accurate for a small 45! I also have the PT1911 and it also is a very good shooter out of the box. ENJOY.....Boorah
    Most people go through life wondering if they made a difference. Marines don't have that problem! Ronald Reagan

  5. #19
    New Member Array Captain1201's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    3
    I suspect that most of the criticisms are from well intended shooters, based sometimes on experiences from a time when Taurus first entered the US market, and/or criticisms based on patriotism, and Taurus' foreign origin, and that's fine too.

    But, just on the merits, I suspect that many have not given Taurus a new look in years, or personally evaluated their products recently, within the last 5 years. That doesn't diminish problems some may have had with them in the past. But, today, they have nothing to be ashamed of compared to the other brands.

    I've been in the firearms business for 30 years. I have access to all the brands, and I've dealt with all the customer service departments, etc...I even have my own criticisms of Taurus, mostly minor design issues with my Millennium Pro, mag release button positioning, and I prefer three dot sights to the Heine Straight Eights. These are things I would like to see corrected, but no criticisms that exceed any of the other brands, and my opinions with respect to these "flaws" are primarily subjective.

    My own evaluation of the internal parts and mechanisms of my PT140 Millennium Pro indicates that Taurus now produces firearms that are as good as any of the supposedly better quality, more expensive brands. Warranty? Taurus has a lifetime warranty too, and I've experienced no difference in dealing with their customer service department versus any of the other manufacturers.

    I don't mean to sound like some kind of advocate, because I have no affiliation with Taurus, or any particular allegiance to them. I just find a lot of the quality criticisms of Taurus to be short on technical justification, and my actual experiences with Taurus firearms to be generally quite positive. With respect to reliability, my own Millennium Pro PT140 has exceeded the reliability of several other, more expensive, brands.

    So, with all sincerity, and all due respect to some of the criticisms that may be valid to someone's specific circumstances, I'd like to know...specifically, what are the internal quality differences between the Taurus Millennium Pro versus all the rest of these supposed higher quality, better reliability polymer firearms I frequently hear about, most of which cost considerably more? Perhaps other more expensive brands provide a higher level of longevity that justifies the price, but I don't see any difference with respect to Taurus' reliability.

  6. #20
    Member Array grnwdjsn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    59
    This is a great thread. I bought a PT709 a few months ago and have been really impressed with it. So much so, that when I stumbled across a 24/7 OSS DS .45, I snapped it up yesterday. What a gun for the $$$! Taurus has come a long way. I will post a review of the OSS when I get some range time on it.

  7. #21
    Moderator
    Array gasmitty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    10,018
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain1201 View Post
    I suspect that most of the criticisms are from well intended shooters, based sometimes on experiences from a time when Taurus first entered the US market, and/or criticisms based on patriotism, and Taurus country of origin, and that's fine too.

    But, just on the merits, I suspect that many have not given Taurus a new look in years, or personally evaluated their products recently, within the last 5 years. That doesn't diminish problems some may have had with them in the past. But, today, they have nothing to be ashamed of compared to the other brands.

    I've been in the firearms business for 30 years. I have access to all the brands, and I've dealt with all the customer service departments, etc...I even have my own criticisms of Taurus, mostly minor design flaws that I would like to see corrected, but none that exceed any of the other brands.

    My own evaluation of the internal parts and mechanisms of my PT140 Millennium Pro indicates that Taurus now produces firearms that are as good as anything else on the market. Warranty? Taurus has a lifetime warranty too, and I've experienced no difference in dealing with their customer service department versus any of the other manufacturers.

    I don't mean to sound like some kind of advocate, because I have no affiliation with Taurus, or any particular allegiance to them. I just find a lot of the quality criticisms of Taurus to be short on technical justification.

    With respect to reliability, my own Millennium Pro PT140 has exceeded the reliability of several other, more expensive, brands.

    So, with all sincerity, and all due respect to some of the criticisms, I'd like to know...what are, specifically, the internal quality differences between the Taurus Millennium Pro versus all the rest of these supposed higher quality, better reliability polymer firearms, most of which cost considerably more? Perhaps other more expensive brands provide a higher level of longevity that justifies the price, but I don't see any difference with respect to Taurus' reliability.
    First - welcome to the forum.

    Next - to answer your question - here are a couple of links that are worth your attention:

    Why do I hate on Taurus 1911s?

    Why I don't work on Taurus revolvers | Revolvers, Gunsmithing, Personal opinions | GrantCunningham.com

    I have 3 "Tauri" - 2 snubs and a 9mm Millennium, and all have served me well, but they range i age from 9 to 20 years old. I've been disappointed with a lot of what I've seen and read (especially here) that relates to Taurus quality and indifferent customer service in more recent years. JD's post (first one cited) had some good pictures that illustrate some of the problems.
    Smitty
    NRA Endowment Member

  8. #22
    Distinguished Member Array RevolvingMag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Rock Hill, SC- Across Town From Where All the Homicides Happen
    Posts
    1,266
    Quote Originally Posted by BugDude View Post
    This is starting to sound like an AA meeting or something:

    "My name is BugDude...and I own a Taurus."
    "My name is Cory, and I have had two 'Taurii'".

    My first was a 24/7 Pro Compact ~4"bbl, 10+1 mag, 12rnd mag. It was a good gun, but it wasn't as accurate as I would want it to be- aim at the same spot twice, might hit it again, might not. Don't know until you pull the trigger. Never more than about one bullet-width off, but still, that's a BIG difference at 15yds versus at 7yds. Then back it out to 20yds... --Not a bad gun, but not the best either.

    My second (and current) Taurus, is my PT22. 9 round capacity, tip up barrel... nothing too special. (But, it's all black- almost got the 'highlighter green' frame, but decided against). It's been a good gun; out of almost 200rnds, only 5-10 FTFs/FTEs (using cheap bulk ammo- none at all with the CCI Mini-Mags). I plan to keep this one for a long time.

    ...Where'd you say the coffee is..?
    "Rock and load, lock and roll... what's it matter? FIRE!!"

    "Gun control means hitting your target every time."

    Please take everything I say with at least one grain of salt- I am a very sarcastic person with a very dry sense of humor.

  9. #23
    New Member Array Captain1201's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    3
    Thanks for the welcome, and I appreciate the links. I reviewed the links and agree that machining, and raw material quality, are the key to a quality metal firearm. I guess, I should have been more specific and targeted the polymer firearms in my inquiry, which have virtually no machining, and I should have even been more specific in targeting their personal defense, concealed carry weapons as the subject of my initial comments.

    The Taurus link you sent on the 1911 was a terrible representation of quality. I suppose one could assume that if the machining quality of the metal firearm is poor, that their polymer firearm quality might be just the same. But, my experience with the Millennium Pro, and the entire Taurus polymer concealed carry, self defense product line has been just the opposite so far.

    With respect to the polymer firearms, I actually do own a Smith & Wesson M&P9, Full Size, which is flawless. I also own an M&P40C. The first time at the range with the M&P40C, it had to go back to the factory due to (5) dead triggers out of (75) rounds. Just got it back, and haven't had a chance to try it out yet.

    The Taurus had it's own problems too, but they were very minor compared to a dead trigger. Never had any problem with Dear Trigger, FTF or FTE with the Taurus. It had to go back to the factory because of an inadvertent mag release, most of which I believe were my thumb hitting the release button, which is the design flaw I referred to in my earlier post. Taurus claimed that the mag release mechanism needed replacing, and they did so, but I believe it's more a design issue with respect to mag release positioning than anything else.

    I don't particularly like the Straight Eight sights on the Taurus, and the sights needed to be set too, shooting low and to the left. The factory took care of that at the same time as replacing the mag release mechanism. I had it back in two weeks. The Smith & Wesson was back at the factory for warranty repair for about 4 weeks. So, my experience with respect to customer service is generally acceptable from both manufacturers, assuming the M&P40C functions properly this time.

    Eventually, I replaced the straight eights on the Taurus with Williams Fire Sights, which have been great, and they've increased accuracy due to their being adjustable, and easier to pick up on. The Taurus accuracy was perfectly acceptable, palm size groupings at 15 yards, but the Williams Sights probably cut that in half. I also reversed the positioning of the mag release to the other side of the Taurus. I actually prefer it to the M&P40C. However, will give the M&P40C another go around, and may prefer it to the Taurus, assuming the dead trigger condition has been corrected.

    I guess my point was that all of the polymer models, including Glock, Smith & Wesson, SIG, etc...have their negative testimonials posted on the blogs and websites. I was shocked that I had to return the S&W right out of the box, and just as shocked that the Taurus faired so well against it for the price difference.
    Last edited by Captain1201; June 22nd, 2012 at 02:49 PM.

  10. #24
    Member Array Maverick7340's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    199
    I have a PT145 and it shoots well and feels great in my hand. The problem I have with it is if you try to clear an unshot bullet it sometimes gets jammed because the bullet isn't much smaller then the ejection port. This isn't good in a stressful situation if you need to clear the chamber for some reason.

    Also, the plastic dust cover on the back of the slide broke and after a year of constantly calling the CS center I finally got a new dust cover.

    I now use the gun as an emergency gun in the spare bedroom.
    Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway.

    John Wayne

  11. #25
    Senior Member Array Sig35seven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,115
    I really liked my Taurus millennium pro until, at around 1000 rounds, the trigger spring broke while doing double taps. I lost confidence at that point and sold it.
    "Confidence is food for the wise man but liquor for the fool"

  12. #26
    New Member Array Captain1201's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Sig35seven View Post
    I really liked my Taurus millennium pro until, at around 1000 rounds, the trigger spring broke while doing double taps. I lost confidence at that point and sold it.
    Yeah, I have to admit, I had more inherent confidence in S&W's M&P series, and that was my justification to consider switching to the M&P40C over the Taurus, until I experienced the dead trigger condition right out of the box on the M&P40C. I have about 800 rounds through my Taurus PT140, and not one hick-up. But, I'll keep an eye on it...

    For me, the jury's still out on the M&P40C to replace the Taurus. My expectations were high. Frankly, I was SHOCKED at the M&P! I received it back from S&W, and I'll give it a thorough testing and go from there.

  13. #27
    Distinguished Member Array claude clay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    ct
    Posts
    1,891
    carried one and shot many a IDPA with it. as you found out--its accurate. my defender suprised me with 1.5" groups at 25 yards.
    when this did the same i was very pleased; not to say a bit suprised: its half the price.

    downside is a longer lock-time. but in a SD encounter that is not a point against the gun.
    Be aware, be deliberate in your actions and be accurate.
    -------------------
    Why do those elected to positions of power than work so hard
    to deny those same opportunities to the same people who empowered them

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Taurus Millenium PT145 Failure to Feed
    By stazio199 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: December 28th, 2012, 08:44 PM
  2. Bianchi Holster, Taurus PT145 Millenium
    By UnklFungus in forum Related Gear & Equipment
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: April 30th, 2010, 01:40 PM
  3. Taurus PT145 PRO Millenium
    By rmeron in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: April 28th, 2010, 06:18 PM
  4. Taurus millenium pro PT145?
    By 1911luver in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: December 18th, 2009, 05:33 PM
  5. Taurus MilPro PT145 pre-range report
    By sisco in forum Defensive Carry Guns
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: November 3rd, 2006, 11:26 PM

Search tags for this page

pt145 pro
,

pt145 review

,
taurus millenium pro 145 review
,
taurus millenium pt145 review
,
taurus pt145 millenium pro
,
taurus pt145 millenium pro accessories
,

taurus pt145 millenium pro review

,

taurus pt145 millenium pro reviews

,
taurus pt145 millennium pro
,
taurus pt145 millennium pro review
,

taurus pt145 pro accessories

,

taurus pt145 review

Click on a term to search for related topics.