Very Interesting......check it out.

This is a discussion on Very Interesting......check it out. within the Defensive Carry Guns forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Finally, A Sensible Gun Registration Plan That Will Work Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well ...

Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Very Interesting......check it out.

  1. #1
    Member Array jrkrk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    74

    Very Interesting......check it out.

    Finally, A Sensible Gun Registration Plan That Will Work


    Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment

    to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution

    very carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents

    is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.

    Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners"

    and require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont

    would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury

    of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege

    of not owning a gun.

    Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not

    only affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms,

    but as a clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun

    ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as

    an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well

    as criminals.

    Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have

    a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State"

    and those persons who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing

    arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says

    Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm

    themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any

    situation that may arise."

    Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be

    required to register their name, address, Social Security Number,

    and driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate

    government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the

    state should they be asked to do so," Maslack says.

    Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the

    least restrictive laws of any state... it's currently the only state

    that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit.

    This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has

    resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation.

    " America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within

    the system, but too early to shoot the ********."

    This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have

    to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting

    to own guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their

    own way.








  2. Remove Ads

  3. #2
    VIP Member
    Array OldVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    S. Florida, north of the Miami mess, south of the Mouse trap
    Posts
    15,721
    An interesting proposal, but not very realistic. It sounds a lot like like the rediculous rhetoric the anti-gunners use.

    A "right" to do anything doesn't make it mandatory. It simply implies that you can if you choose to do so.

    I have the "right" to stand on the street corner and present my views about anything to anyone. But, that doesn't mean I "have" to. (I wish a lot of people didn't use that right.) Otherwise, we're going to need a lot more street corners.

    I have the "right" to vote, but I don't have to. Then I'm stuck with everyone else's choice. But that would be my choice.
    Retired USAF E-8. Remember: You're being watched!
    Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep. It starts when you're always afraid... "For What It's Worth" Buffalo Springfield

  4. #3
    VIP Member Array jwhite75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    5,323
    Honestly there are a lot of people who dont have guns...that I wouldnt want to have guns.
    Friends don't let friends be MALL NINJAS.


    I am just as nice as anyone lets me be and can be just as mean as anyone makes me. - Quoted from Terryger, New member to our forum.

  5. #4
    Member Array 2ndAmend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    164
    A "right" to do anything doesn't make it mandatory. It simply implies that you can if you choose to do so.
    1 agree 100%!!

  6. #5
    Mic
    Mic is offline
    Senior Member Array Mic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    On loan from Arizona
    Posts
    963
    Quote Originally Posted by OldVet View Post
    A "right" to do anything doesn't make it mandatory. It simply implies that you can if you choose to do so.
    Not so, IF the state constitution reads as stated "Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves", then this action is quite possable.

    However, this would never get passt the crazy liberal left.

    Im no lawyer but it would be nice to see nationwide, I wonder what the ACLU's take is on this.
    Timid people sleep peacefully at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.


    Molôn Labé!

  7. #6
    Member Array cinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    209
    An interesting point. I like the progressive attitude. It's not unlike the "shall issue" legislation being passed across the country; just a bit too extreme.

  8. #7
    Member Array monk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Danville, Virginia
    Posts
    159
    It could be looked at as an equalizer to the left... If you keep pushing to disarm America, we'll start being more assertive towards the right... Just a thought.
    Chinese Proverb:
    "When someone shares something of value with you and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others."
    VCDL member (DE.357;Ruger 4" GP-100 .357;Ruger 2.2" SP-101 cc hammer .357;BT .380cc.

  9. #8
    VIP Member
    Array RoadRunner71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    6,311
    So, doesn't anyone see a problem with having to register one way or the other?

    My opinion is that the less the government gets involved in ANYTHING the better. The consequences of not being armed when necessary is enough of a punishment for those who choose not to own a firearm.

    As far as it being a REQUIREMENT in the Vermont constitution, if they haven't enforced it before now, they aren't likely to start now. Frivolous legislation in my opinion. We have better things to be dealing with.
    "Mind own business"
    "Always cut cards"

  10. #9
    Member Array ev239's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    491
    This has been floating around for quite a while. It's not a current event, but it is novel...

    Alphecca Vermont to Register Non-Gun Owners?
    Mine: Glock 36............Wife's: Ruger SP101 3"
    -------Ruger SR9....................Ruger SR9c
    -------S&W SW99 .45.............Charter Arms Undercover

    Hidden Defense - Personal gun & holster designs/reviews.

  11. #10
    VIP Member Array BugDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Gulf Coast of Florida
    Posts
    9,315
    I can see the sign at the border now:

    "Welcome to Vermont. If you do not have a gun, we will issue one to you. If you choose not to carry it, you will receive a ticket. Thank you for visiting. Come back soon.
    Know Guns, Know Safety, Know Peace.
    No Guns, No Safety, No Peace.


    Guns are like sex and air...its no big deal until YOU can't get any.

  12. #11
    VIP Member Array searcher 45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    TEXAS
    Posts
    4,151
    This Vermont Rep should be President of the USA with a Pro 2A Congress.
    NOT LIVING IN FEAR, JUST READY!!!
    I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness,
    nor the arrow for its swiftness,
    nor the warrior for his glory.
    I love only that which they defend.
    -J.R.R. Tolkien

  13. #12
    Member Array glock45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    384
    Why instead of assessing a $500 fine for not owning a gun, the county imposes a year sentence in jail?

    Joking aside.. I am very pro gun and I think most people should carry but it is completely unrealistic to think this would catch on.

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Very Interesting..............check it out.
    By jrkrk in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: February 3rd, 2010, 02:00 PM
  2. Antifreeze-check, wiper blades-check, ammo?
    By BuckeyeEric in forum Defensive Ammunition & Ballistics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: October 6th, 2009, 05:29 PM
  3. Replies: 36
    Last Post: April 30th, 2009, 05:04 PM
  4. What do you check before and after? (I now do magazine seat check)
    By stgdz in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: November 7th, 2007, 01:31 AM
  5. How does the NICS check differ from the Check to get your Handgun Permit?
    By IndianaJones in forum Concealed Carry Issues & Discussions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: September 18th, 2006, 08:33 PM