IWB holster question

IWB holster question

This is a discussion on IWB holster question within the Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options forums, part of the Defensive Carry Discussions category; Would anyone care to comment based on experience or give opinions on the different clip/belt loop configurations of IWB holstes? It seems that there are ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Senior Member Array High Altitude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    541

    IWB holster question

    Would anyone care to comment based on experience or give opinions on the different clip/belt loop configurations of IWB holstes?

    It seems that there are three basic styles.

    1. The clips/belt loops that are fore and aft of the gun.

    2. There is only one clip/belt loop and it is behind the gun.

    3. One clip/belt loop and it is directly on the side of the gun.

    How does the various locations of the clips/belt loops affect the performance of the holster?


  2. #2
    Member Array oregonshooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Medford, OR.
    Posts
    270
    1. Most stable, little to no movement of holster
    2. skip (no experience)
    3. Tend to move around a little, but offer smaller placement increments on the belt (in between loops)

  3. #3
    VIP Member Array maclean3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    3,085
    1). What oregonshooter said. Additionally, they tend to be more comfortable because they spread the weight over a larger "footprint area" - sort of like a snowshoe effect.

    2). A little puzzled with this one but perhaps one of our leatherbenders will chime in.

    3). Again, what OS said. Also works the opposite of the wider spread loops in that they concentrate the weapon's weight onto a smaller area of the hip. I use one for my Airweight J-frame (15 oz.) but hate them for anything heavier.

    Personally, I prefer the wider spread loops and even have one on order for my J-frame. When it arrives, my current holster (type 3) will probably find its way to "the box" and be an emergency backup only.
    Jack

  4. #4
    Member Array oregonshooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Medford, OR.
    Posts
    270
    More things to consider...

    #3 will be more comfy during driving, less foot print.
    #3 usually will hold the gun higher (#1 design is limited) for a better grip.

    #4 OWB is the best of all these, except requires long cover garments. After 15+ years of IWB, I'm willing to buy tall polo shirts for the comfort. And NO it has nothing to do with my new love handles! :)

  5. #5
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    16,025
    1 never tried
    2 tends to let the gun rock a bit , atleast with the Tuck this Desantis nylon I have
    3 rock a little , but not much for me.

    haven't tried loops yet, my next holster will have this option

  6. #6
    Member Array Gary Brommeland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,424
    Howdy!

    Option # 1: Superb - IMHO, the single best method of attaching an IWB to the belt. It offers excellent stability and GREATLY enhances concealment. Solid, reliable and offers no drawbacks to my knowledge. (I'm wearing such a holster as I type this)

    Option # 2: Just plain sucks, IMHO. It allows the firearm to "rock" on the belt, constantly changing it's rake angle. It also permits you to be EASILY disarmed and killed w/ your own gun from behind.

    Option #3: Not as good as #1, but a solid system that's been around a long time. It's main drawback is that it compromises concealment somewhat. Otherwise, solid and reliable.

  7. #7
    1952 - 2006
    Array acparmed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Posts
    1,371
    Quote Originally Posted by Gary Brommeland
    Howdy!

    Option # 1: Superb - IMHO, the single best method of attaching an IWB to the belt. It offers excellent stability and GREATLY enhances concealment. Solid, reliable and offers no drawbacks to my knowledge. (I'm wearing such a holster as I type this)

    Option # 2: Just plain sucks, IMHO. It allows the firearm to "rock" on the belt, constantly changing it's rake angle. It also permits you to be EASILY disarmed and killed w/ your own gun from behind.

    Option #3: Not as good as #1, but a solid system that's been around a long time. It's main drawback is that it compromises concealment somewhat. Otherwise, solid and reliable.
    Reference Option #2: Gary, I believe that you are a brilliant and innovative holster maker. Tho I don't own one of your holsters, I can see in their design great workmanship. AND I hear good things via word of mouth. (Your best advertising). With that caveat let me say this: I have 2 Andrews Leather McDaniel IWB for my 1911's. They both have the second option. They are made with the rough side leather out and with a gripping star washer between the loop and where it attaches to the holster itself (which allows you to set the rake and then lock it) and has never moved an iota on me. I carry it at the 4 O’clock position. It's fast, stable and very concealable. I carry a full size 1911 under a t-shirt in the summer time here in Vegas and there is no sign of 'printing' (I'm 5'8" and 150#, so I'm not a big guy).

    So I have to disagree with you on this point. No offense intended.
    Heroes are people who do what has to be done, when it has to be done, regardless of the consequences

    "I like when the enemy shoots at me; then I know where the ******** are and can kill them."
    ~George Patton

    DE OPPRESSO LIBER

  8. #8
    Member Array oregonshooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Medford, OR.
    Posts
    270
    PS. I want to be first to get suck up points in and say that I own a MAXCON 5 from Gary and it's the shizzle for design #1. He even has a reinforced mouth version called the MAXCON 6 now, although he's been too busy making holsters to update his website. :)

    Back to work Gary!! LOL
    j/k

  9. #9
    Member Array Gary Brommeland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,424
    Quote Originally Posted by acparmed
    Reference Option #2: Gary, I have 2 Andrews Leather McDaniel IWB for my 1911's. They both have the second option. They are made with the rough side leather out and with a gripping star washer between the loop and where it attaches to the holster itself (which allows you to set the rake and then lock it) and has never moved an iota on me. I carry it at the 4 O’clock position. It's fast, stable and very concealable. I carry a full size 1911 under a t-shirt in the summer time here in Vegas and there is no sign of 'printing' (I'm 5'8" and 150#, so I'm not a big guy).

    So I have to disagree with you on this point. No offense intended.

    No offense taken. (I gotta admit that I was expecting such a response from you - I know that you are a big fan of Sam's work. 'Sorry, but I couldn't resist yankin' yer chain a bit )
    I qualified my statement as being my opinion, and everyone certainly has a right to their own view of things. Furthermore, what works for one person, does not necessarily work for another.
    Having said that, I know Sam and although he and I have vastly differing viewpoints on some design concepts, I respect him and his work. The McDaniel works BECAUSE it is rough out. That extra friction makes all the difference and I agree with you that IT is a viable design. (However, with a forceful yank the disarm thing still stands.)
    However, when this belt loop design is employed w/ a smooth-out holster, I stand by my original statement.
    I certainly don't ever intend to offend anyone (except Liberals). I just have this habit of being pretty blunt. 'Sorry.

  10. #10
    Assistant Administrator
    Array P95Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    South West PA
    Posts
    25,484
    Welcome High Altitude

    I am just chipping in to promote OWB LOL! If it's remotely too warm I sweat gallons - I don't want pants 2" bigger than I need and - all my cover garments always have generous length and so a ''tight-in'' OWB is a breeze to conceal.

    I am biased - in case no one noticed - just me!
    Chris - P95
    NRA Certified Instructor & NRA Life Member.

    "To own a gun and assume that you are armed
    is like owning a piano and assuming that you are a musician!."


    http://www.rkba-2a.com/ - a portal for 2A links, articles and some videos.

  11. #11
    Member Array Gary Brommeland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,424
    Quote Originally Posted by oregonshooter
    PS
    Back to work Gary!! LOL
    j/k

    Yes,Sir!

  12. #12
    VIP Member Array ExSoldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Coral Gables, FL
    Posts
    5,802

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by acparmed
    Reference Option #2: Gary, I believe that you are a brilliant and innovative holster maker. Tho I don't own one of your holsters, I can see in their design great workmanship. AND I hear good things via word of mouth. (Your best advertising). With that caveat let me say this: I have 2 Andrews Leather McDaniel IWB for my 1911's. They both have the second option. They are made with the rough side leather out and with a gripping star washer between the loop and where it attaches to the holster itself (which allows you to set the rake and then lock it) and has never moved an iota on me. I carry it at the 4 O’clock position. It's fast, stable and very concealable. I carry a full size 1911 under a t-shirt in the summer time here in Vegas and there is no sign of 'printing' (I'm 5'8" and 150#, so I'm not a big guy).

    So I have to disagree with you on this point. No offense intended.
    Yeah, I LOVE My McDaniel IWB too. I use if for both my 1911's and my BHP. One other requirement for me is the additrion of a shield to prevent the gun from digging into my side. My "love handles" long ago transformed into LIFTING BARS. I'm about to get an H&K USP standard size 45 and I'm wondering if IWB carry is practical for this one. It's a big gun. But then, I'm about 6' and 250 lbs. So it might work. I carried my Glock M21 for years in a Sam Andrews IPSC Paddle Holster and it worked great.
    Former Army Infantry Captain; 25 yrs as an NRA Certified Instructor; Avid practitioner of the martial art: KLIK-PAO.

  13. #13
    VIP Member Array maclean3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    3,085
    Quote Originally Posted by oregonshooter
    PS. I want to be first to get suck up points in and say that I own a MAXCON 5 from Gary and it's the shizzle for design #1. He even has a reinforced mouth version called the MAXCON 6 now, although he's been too busy making holsters to update his website. :)

    Geez, Gary mentioned the MaxCon6 when I called to order my Wilderness belt ... I thought I'd just heard him wrong . I GOTTS'TA have me one a those when I get the new .45!
    Jack

  14. #14
    Member Array soflasmg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    216
    Must...

    buy.....

    Maxcon.....

    6....
    The Marshmallowist

  15. #15
    Lead Moderator
    Array rocky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    16,025
    Can't say for leather ,but unless I wear a tight fitting pair of pants, the Nylon Tuck this does rock a bit. Especially with soft pants like cotton dockers or 511 pants.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Sig 239 holster question
    By skystud1 in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: October 2nd, 2007, 12:09 AM
  2. Iwb Holster question
    By compgun in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: September 4th, 2007, 01:05 AM
  3. Question about a holster
    By fairway1 in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: August 27th, 2007, 05:58 PM
  4. H&K holster fit question
    By paramedic70002 in forum General Firearm Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 22nd, 2007, 10:26 AM
  5. A holster question for all
    By Gary Brommeland in forum Defensive Carry Holsters & Carry Options
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: May 9th, 2006, 01:26 AM

Search tags for this page

andrews leather holsters suck
,
inside the waistband holsters suck
,
iwb holsters suck
,
off set belt loop for iwb holsters
,

rough out leather iwb with offset loops

Click on a term to search for related topics.

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» DefensiveCarry Sponsors